Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #2876  
sixgears's Avatar
THE BIRDS
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
OK, so months later when you remember how you cowardly left a comment only to disappear you'll see this "retort".
You're calling me a coward for not frequenting this forum? I typically do not come on here for this reason exactly - but there was something that told me I would get this sort of response out of you.


Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Funny how you already have it in your head that I'm opposed to you already and will leave a defensive comment
Tell me I was wrong to think such.....

Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
YES I agree that toe will wear a tire MUCH quicker then camber no doubt, and I don't doubt that most of the tire wear you see out there is from toe because some guys just don't get their stuff aligned.
Good, glad to hear that. Since we're on exactly the same page as of this point, you shouldn't have much more to say. For reference:
Originally Posted by sixgears
not to blame for most people's tire wear issues
The key word here is blame. If
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
toe will wear a tire MUCH quicker then camber
then the logical conclusion is that in MOST cases, the MAJORITY of the blame should be placed on toe.

Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
But your acting like camber doesn't wear tires
No, my friend, I was not.

Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
you've been hit with the stupid stick too many times and the sap from such stick has seeped into your brain. What is this you’re new found internet wisdom you discovered and are the self proclaimed king of this misinformation?
Getting feisty now, huh. GROW UP E-thug.


Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Remember (if you have the tension span to read my small retort and can comprehend what you’re reading)
It's "ATTENTION span", bro.


Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
I'm agreeing with your comment, but NOT agreeing with your attitude that camber won’t wear tires out. If you believe such none-sense, well, I don't care lol.

Summed up, yeah, toe wears tires much faster then camber ever will.
This again? You could have said it once and not have gotten so damn wound up about it and you would have been doing us all a favor.

For the sake of civility, don't cloud this thread with anymore of your nonsensical attacks against the whole. We (those who prefer to fit wider than 8s and 9s on our RX7s), see your point of view and don't give a rat's *** about it. You're not doing anyone ANY good by telling us that we're doing things wrong. Deal with it.

I'll check back b/c I know something juicy is coming. Don't let everyone down.

You're on stage.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #2877  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by sixgears
You're calling me a coward for not frequenting this forum? I typically do not come on here for this reason exactly - but there was something that told me I would get this sort of response out of you.




Tell me I was wrong to think such.....



Good, glad to hear that. Since we're on exactly the same page as of this point, you shouldn't have much more to say. For reference:


The key word here is blame. If then the logical conclusion is that in MOST cases, the MAJORITY of the blame should be placed on toe.



No, my friend, I was not.



Getting feisty now, huh. GROW UP E-thug.




It's "ATTENTION span", bro.




This again? You could have said it once and not have gotten so damn wound up about it and you would have been doing us all a favor.

For the sake of civility, don't cloud this thread with anymore of your nonsensical attacks against the whole. We (those who prefer to fit wider than 8s and 9s on our RX7s), see your point of view and don't give a rat's *** about it. You're not doing anyone ANY good by telling us that we're doing things wrong. Deal with it.

I'll check back b/c I know something juicy is coming. Don't let everyone down.

You're on stage.
I disagree.

every instance I've seen/experienced of accelerated tire wear was because of bad camber.

the reason is you can't fix bad camber from decent lowering without getting camber adjusters, which most people don't. but toe can be fixed by an alignment easily. therefor as long as you're not a dumbass and actually get alignments fairly regularly, toe will never be an issue (unless you want the toe) while fixing camber takes much more effort.

I think you're the *** here who just makes up random statistics and claim them as fact, that kind of **** is exactly what ruins forums.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #2878  
sixgears's Avatar
THE BIRDS
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Well I think a lot of people OTHER than you have "seen/experienced" poor wear characteristics that were based on toe issues, rather than camber. I did strictly alignments at a shop for a span, that is where my "random statistics" come from.

I do agree with your second statement, it is an obvious fact.



I'm really not trying to be an ***, I did not mean to come across that way. Reread my first post with that in mind. I was merely speaking out of experience.

When "Mike" decided to continue his crusade against what I consider to be stylish and somewhat functional wheel fitment in the manner that he did, I could not help but defend myself. Did you not think that some of his statements were but a little bit childish?

As for what ruins forums, IN MY OPINION, it is actually the closed-mindedness combined with a hasty tongue that are actually at fault.

Carry on.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #2879  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by t00sh0rt
i need opinions

17x7 +42 all around with 205/40 tires.... and intrax lowering springs

I would like to try and get these flush if possible.... please let me know spacer sizes that I would need to get them both flush....
17 mm spacer in the front I believe
32 - 37 mm spacer in the back, based on my calculations.

All right guys, settle down, if you want to argue, take it to the lounge or PM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 02:31 AM
  #2880  
TehMonkay's Avatar
Back in the game
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: Louisville KY
I want to run a 275 35 18 in the back with a +25 offset, i am assuming this is not possible without, 20mm more fender? 18x9.5" wheel.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #2881  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
maybe even 25 mm.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #2882  
Josh18_2k's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 1
From: Gresham, OR
Originally Posted by TehMonkay
I want to run a 275 35 18 in the back with a +25 offset, i am assuming this is not possible without, 20mm more fender? 18x9.5" wheel.
this is how much more room you'll need (285 on 27mm offset.. close enough)
Name:  DSC00620.jpg
Views: 226
Size:  67.3 KB
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 01:41 AM
  #2883  
IllmicIll's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: g-spot
I've read lotta 17x8 35mm 235/45 (F), 17x9 35mm 255/40 (R), but I dont think ive read any with tokiko (blues) and eibach springs. Im assuming ima have to roll the fenders at least. im leaning towards something like work equips.

Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 01:42 AM
  #2884  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
I'd go for 235/40/17's in front, they'll leave more room. 235/45/17's are a bunch taller than stock.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #2885  
IllmicIll's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: g-spot
thanks.. will they clear the tokikos tho?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #2886  
Josh18_2k's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 1
From: Gresham, OR
i had 235/40/17 on 17x8 +30 with tokicos. you'll be fine
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #2887  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
It's not shocks that cause clearance problems, it's springs.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #2888  
George84's Avatar
I am back
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Highland, IL near St. Louis
Well guys I got some new wheels and tires for my vert that fill the fenders well and look real good with no rubbing but they are close to the struts on the front (1/4" gap) they are 16x7 rims with a 40 offset, 225/50 R16 tires front and rear. I will take pics soon.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #2889  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
That's the same as stock TII/GTUs size wheels, and it's common to have very little clearance on the inside with those size tires. If you're not having rubbing then don't worry about it and just leave it be.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #2890  
George84's Avatar
I am back
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Highland, IL near St. Louis
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
That's the same as stock TII/GTUs size wheels, and it's common to have very little clearance on the inside with those size tires. If you're not having rubbing then don't worry about it and just leave it be.
Originally Posted by Wanked_FC
16x7 +40 is the stock rim size of the Turbo II. You can fit 205/55/16, and sometimes 225/50/16 depending on the tire.
I have Firehawk Wide Oval tires and just letting it be known they fit
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #2891  
TehMonkay's Avatar
Back in the game
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: Louisville KY
Out of curiosity, do running coil overs actually help with inner clearance?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #2892  
owen is fat's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
coilovers = more space?

front - no.
rear - yes.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #2893  
George84's Avatar
I am back
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Highland, IL near St. Louis
Originally Posted by George84
I have Firehawk Wide Oval tires and just letting it be known they fit
Originally Posted by YearsOfDecay
Here is a zip of an excel file that i made up when i got tired of going to the web calculator

You put in your starting wheel width and offset, the wheel you are going to, the old tire SECTION width the NEW tire section width and the MEASING WHEEL Width....

It then take into account the diffference in the wheel size, offset, tire size and measuring wheel size...

Measuring wheel size is important... the section width a tire will expand .2 inches for every .5 inches you go over the size of the wheel that the section widtch of the tire was originally measured on...

Example... a 215/45/18 tire may have a section with of 8.5 inches as measured on a 7 inch rim (this is actually a Kumho MX)...... If you put it on an 8 inch rim, it will now have a section width of closer to 7.4 inches.... This can make a big difference when trying to get past the front suspension on our cars. It may also explain why some people get away with 225's on 8 inchers and others do not!!!!

I used 9MM as too far in on the fronts, 30 mm as too far in on the back and 25 mm as too far out...

Play with it... se what you guys think... If you have GOOD numbers and HAVE PICS of tire/wheel combos that this thins says wont work.. lemme know so i can fix it and get a new version out.
Also this offset calculator says my frount tires (225/50 R16 w/ 9.1"section width) do not fit when they do, so I think the caculator off a bit

Last edited by George84; Feb 10, 2008 at 09:03 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 10:30 PM
  #2894  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Every tire is a little different, so you'll never have any calculator that's 100% accurate all the time. The most you can hole for is that it's maybe within 5% 90% of the time.

In front coilovers really don't give any more clearance. Maybe if you're previously running springs that gave less clearance then yes, but generally it's a no.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 10:30 PM
  #2895  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by owen is fat
coilovers = more space?

front - no.
rear - yes.
um....don't you have it backwards?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #2896  
TehMonkay's Avatar
Back in the game
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: Louisville KY
Yeah, i think the control arms get hit first in the rear.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #2897  
Josh18_2k's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 1
From: Gresham, OR
Originally Posted by owen is fat
coilovers = more space?

front - no.
rear - yes.
this is correct. stock front springs are above the tire, coilovers are next to the tire.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 04:06 AM
  #2898  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by Roen
um....don't you have it backwards?
Amazingly, that's actually correct.
Unless you get one of those coilovers that offer adjustable lower perches that you can spin it all the way up to clear the tire sidewall, you don't get more clearance.
I know the Tein RA and HKS coilovers allow you to do this.
Ground Controls don't - in fact, they eat up more space due to the adjustable lower perch usually sitting right next to the tire sidewell.

For rears, even if you go with a "thin" spring, you run into clearance issues with the trailing arm snaking to the front of the car.
Tires / wheels tend to hit both the stock (type) spring and the trailing arm at about the same time.


-Ted
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #2899  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
hmmm.....something I didn't know, I'll remember that for next time.

I had thought it was the way I thought it was because I had issues with spring rub running 225 Bridgestones (which are notorious for being wider than their stated width) on stock TII wheels with Tanabe springs, I had thought I wasnt clearing one of the coils, but I guess it might have been the perch.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #2900  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Well those springs are notorious for cutting down on space in front. You can rub on the springs, they're mostly above the tire, not entirely.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.