Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

howard coleman's FD Chassis/Setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-10, 09:54 PM
  #676  
Racing is Life.....

 
Beast From The East's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Add'l info - the car has a 13BRE out of a Cosmo, with TO4S at 18lbs boost, so about 400 rwhp.
Old 05-01-10, 08:02 AM
  #677  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
welcome to the thread.

skip the corner balancing unless you have tire temperature data from a pyrometer to tell you what to do. just set the car up square at 25 inches. go to the track, record your tire pressures (starting out cold 30/27) and then hot. record your tire temps w a pyrometer (not particularly expensive and essential for doing any further setup), shock travel at each corner and post the results.

as to weight... you need to move as much as you can to the rear, the inside (generally passenger side as most tracks are clockwise) and low.

spend the corner balancing money on a pyrometer, tire pressure gauge, 4 tiewraps and a notebook.

howard
Old 05-01-10, 01:17 PM
  #678  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
Regarding corner balancing...

When I installed my Koni + Ground Control coilovers, I set ride height to ~25 1/4" front and 25 1/2" rear. I made sure to check ride height by measuring ride height by getting in/out and measuring how much the ride height changed with and w/o my weight in the car. IIRC, the driver's side front changed by about 1/16-1/8", the driver's side rear changed by ~3/8". Passenger side rear changed by about 1/8-3/16ths". This is with my 180lb weight and 450f/350r springs. I added that amount when setting and measuring each corner. The result was a 50/50 weight distribution front/rear and 50.9% wedge. The shop that did the race alignment and was going to do the corner weighting said they had never seen a car so well balanced out of the box.

From a weight perspective, the FD's chassis is amazingly well balanced stock.

I'm running stock twins, full accessories, typical bolt on parts. The only thing I have done that can change weight is by relocating a full size Optima red top to the passenger side bin.

Weighed in at ~2,806lbs with a full tank and no driver.

Moral of the story - spend some time to set the ride height appropriately and spend you money on other parts as howard says.
Old 05-01-10, 01:55 PM
  #679  
Back on the road again!

iTrader: (4)
 
Svelte_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 447
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car looks really sharp. I know what you mean about the rear wanting to come out whenever the gas levels get low. I end up topping off the car between sessions to keep the car consistent and predictable. I'm going to try maxing out the tires width in the rear to 275 (have 255 now) and move the battery to the passenger bin over the summer.

And if you go the Kirkey route, please take some pics. I've been looking at that seat for some time now but just haven't had the funds to pull the trigger. I just might have to re-prioritize...



Originally Posted by Beast From The East
Hi, gang. I'm joining up on this thread, which I've read with interest ever since Howard started it.

I started out with AD coilovers and 550/450 springs. on 8.5/9.5 BBS RGR rims. Went from old Toyo T1S tires to BFG R-1s, 255/275, which was a big help. Still, like Howard aludes, the back end was happy, esp the lower the gas tank got. So I went and solved that with new goodies:

http://www.headonphotos.net/gallery/...zda/index.html

The new wing is obvious (JKLs GT-A **** replica), their rear diffuser is a bit more difficult to spot in the photos.

Back end now sticks. On a higher speed track like Thunderhill, it is wonderful.

New problem - the faster I go, the looser the front end gets. Gee, wonder why? Based on all of Howard's advice, I has a suspicioun that I'd lose grip in the front as I increased speed with the wing pushing down harder and harder. I'm still faster in turn 1 now, but it is unnerving to feel the front end not want to bite.

We're working on a splitter now. I also don't have a race seat yet, I hear good things about Kirkey's Intermediate Road Race seat, esp for the cost. I could sure use it, as I'm now fighting all sorts of new forces and the stock seat doesn't cut it anymore. This is on the list (funny how Howard just said I need one).

http://kirkeyracing.com/index.php?li...&code=Series47

I also have not corner balanced the car, I've just used the 'even height at the fenders' routine...however, now that I've gutted the car's interior, who knows what sort of weight distribution I have now. I will get the car corner balanced before my next event.

My father says he's discovered a new oxymoron - we call it Racing Budget. He's 63 and kicking tail in ST2 down in AZ, should go to Nationals this year. Hope to join him someday.

Beast
Old 05-01-10, 02:17 PM
  #680  
Junior Member

 
pinkfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very nice, alot of information, appreciate that.
Old 05-03-10, 04:03 PM
  #681  
Racing is Life.....

 
Beast From The East's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have pyro and data, but....

Howard -

We do have pyro data, about 16 sessions worth, but it is with a surface pyro and not a probe type. It shows about 110 to 120 degrees C across the face of all tyres, with 35 deg cold going to about 39 to 40 degrees hot, within a pound on each tire. The passenger rear as you have stated is the one that shows the highest temp and pressure, but usually only by a half lb to 1 lb. There are 10 left handers vs. 5 right handers at Thill, and the left handers are much faster than the right handers, so the right side definitely gets worked more because Thunderhill is typically run counterclockwise vs. clockwise.

The car feels best with just over half a tank of gas and 40 lbs of pressure hot across all 4 tires. The back end sticks really well, until you get below a quarter tank.

We took two 'cranks' out of each front coil over to settle a bit more weight on the front of the car, and that got me my best time of the day. Tire pressures and temps didn't really change much, but front end grip improved.

Our next step was to stiffen the rear compression from 2 to 3 to try to prevent the rear from sinking as much on initial acceleration coming out of corners, but we never got to evaluate it as the back of my turbo snail cracked its flange welds to the downpipe before the last session and we were left to wonder what effect it would have had.

I will be getting a probe type pyro for my next event....and may be able to get the Kirkey and seat brace by then as well. Once the car gets back I'll publish my current fender heights

Also, along with the gutted interior, I have Jeff Hoskinson's battery miniturization kit in front, along with M2's medium stock mount, and my A/C is eliminated. The weight of the car and it's balance is a bit of a mystery right now with all the items changed or eliminated.

These are fun problems to have. I'd like to get more rubber up front as well, but will live with 255s for now.

Beast
Old 05-15-10, 05:29 PM
  #682  
Junior Member
 
RX7DTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by howard coleman
So the FD is a super car. It can be made super better. It can also be screwed up. Let’s make it super better.

First let’s start at square one. The FD is a front engine rear drive car. As such, the primary challenge will be to promote rear traction. When you get things dialed you will be focusing on the back end. Think of road racing as drag racing from corner to corner. Consider two cars both able to run identical quarter miles. If one car gets a 1 second head start it will win the drag race.

If you can put your right foot down earlier coming out of a corner than your competitor you will be looking at the next corner first.

Driving fast and being able to get the most out of your car is about feeling comfortable. Being comfortable is about your car telling you what it is about to do in advance. Properly set up your car will talk to you. A properly dialed racecar will give you advance notice so you will find it easy to drive at the limit.

The opposite is… “it just snapped on me.” Spoken typically by someone who has just had an offtrack excursion.

To go fast you need to trust your car.

Which brings me to subject one… lateral weight transfer. Ideally you want equal weight on your lateral tires. Too much weight causes the tire eventually to wash out, lose traction. Further, every pound transferred to the outside tire is removed from the inside tire diminishing it’s value.

There is a major point of confusion here that needs to be cleared up so you can get tuning.

There are only two items that determine total lateral weight transfer…

Center of gravity

Track width.

The typical FD weighs 2900. add 200 for the driver… 3100 pounds. Remove the unsprung weight (wheels/tires, brakes, half of the A arms, half of the shocks/springs, half of the swaybar, half of the driveshafts). Call it 350 pounds.

So… 3100 minus 350= 2750 X 15.5 (center of gravity for stock FD is 17 inches, our track car is lowered a bit) X 1.1 G’s divided by the track (stock is 57.5 minus your positive offset wheels so we use 55.5) = total lateral weight transfer in a 1.1 G turn.

That’s 844 pounds of total lateral weight transfer.

So what can you do about it? Given the ride height and track… Nothing.

But if you put stiffer springs and roll bars on the car it won’t roll as much. Do you see roll anywhere in the aforementioned equation? You can weld the suspension solid, you can bolt on 2000 psi springs and a 6 inch swaybar.

And you will still transfer 844 pounds.

But springs and roll bar stiffness can apportion (front to rear) where the 844 pounds transfer. By changing the longitudinal roll stiffness you can move more of the 844 pounds to the front or to the rear.

And that is one of the ways we can trim our chassis… understeer, oversteer. If, for instance, the chassis is balanced and we increase the rate in the rear we will transfer more of the 844 rearwards and will tend towards oversteer.

BTW, a common mistake when attempting to longitudinally balance a chassis is to work on the wrong end. Let’s say the car is oversteering (rear loose). You could stiffen the front by adding spring or bar but you would be decreasing front grip so it would balance against poor rear grip. You just lost total grip.

The correct path would be to find a way to increase rear grip.

Stiffer springs and shocks do decrease body roll and that is generally a good thing to a point. The FD, due to it’s double A arm front and rear suspension and attendant negative camber gain on bump, is not as effected by roll as most other cars. That is as the crucial outside wheel in a turn moves up into the fenderwell w body roll the suspension adds negative camber thus keeping the wheel properly cambered to the track.

That’s why the FD takes few prisoners ontrack.

Some cars need to run huge springs and bars to kill roll because their suspspension goes off camber in bump. These cars with too much spring rate are very hard to drive near the adhesion limit.

The stock FD spring rate is 263 pounds per inch in front and 195 pounds in the rear. These are my numbers from my Longacre Digital Spring Checker. Just FYI, with linear rated springs the rate increases with contraction. The second inch of the FD front spring is 526 and the third is 789…

I run 432 front and 378 rear. Expressed metrically 8 KG and 6 KG. I am delighted with this rate. If my springs vaporized I would repurchase this rate. It works on the track. It works on the street.

That said, Frank runs 566/422 or 10Kg/8Kg. I consider this rate the outer limit.

Remember, both rates transfer the same lateral load. The higher the rate the harder it is to drive at the limit.

Let’s talk spring and shock options….

Interestingly, the suspension area is one where more money does not necessarily buy more speed. Although there are plenty of vendors wanting to sell you high dollar stuff…

You have two options.

Replace the OEM springs and shocks with aftermarket.

Replace the Oem springs and shocks w a unitized component known as a coil over.

Both work very very well if you select the right stuff.

While there are a number of options I have been extremely happy with the Eibach Pro Kit springset. The rate is 350/255 and they lower the car close to the proper ride height. At a price of around $200 and often seen in our classifieds these extremely high quality springs TRANSFORM the FD. Do not discount this easy to install option.

I owned a Shock Dyno for a number of years. I dynoed 31 OEM FD shocks. They varied between 3500 and 135,000 miles. Interestingly they all dynoed similarly. I like them with the Eibachs.

There are various other aftermarket shocks that would bolt in but I suggest you just try the springs. You will be surprised.

The Coil Over market is sort of like oil. I have always used, and have been sponsored by Mobil One. It has worked for me. Could I really tell you why it is better than XXX? Nope. But if you start a thread on oil you will have many posts on the subject. Ditto Coil Overs. Double adjustable, digressive blah blah blah.

The first question to ask re coil overs is WHAT IS THE SPRING RATE. If you want to slide around buy something with a rate over 10Kg. Or pump up your tires to 75 psi, it’s the same thing.

It is really easy to get into overkill on coil overs. If that’s your deal fine. For the other 95% including me I will be very happy with my modestly priced Tein Has. The valving, remember I have a shock dyno, with 16 settings will give you everything from loosey goosey to rock hard.

My view is after you have spent a few years on the track and have a handle on things and you have nothing better to do you might consider something up the food chain.

There is a lot to learn in the basics area before you get to esoteric. Admittedly that just my opinion here.

Then there’s the “pillowball” upper coil over mount issue. In a word, don’t.

The upper mount of the OEM spring is a rubber insulator. This insulator helps absorb lots of unwanted vibration. There is not one bonafide engineering reason to change the upper mount to steel. Yes, “pillowball” equals steel.

Here’s the key… the upper mount has NOTHING to do with the suspension geometry. There is NO performance advantage. The A arms scribe the geometry. If you do coil overs retain the upper rubber mount.

Swaybars are always an excellent way to control roll and tune for over/understeer. The additional roll stiffness a properly selected swaybar provides allows the springs to be a bit softer thus allowing the tires to spend more time where they belong contacting the pavement.

I am in the late stages of changing my swaybars from OEM. I am installing a Speedway Engineering hollow front bar (35 inches X 1.25 O D X .188 wall thickness). I bought Speedway’s collars and mounting brackets and will purchase their aluminum arms. This will add approximately 60% more roll stiffness than the OEM bar. It will have 3 fine tuning adjustments. I will bend the arms, drill the holes and fab the links.

Mazda went a little crazy lightening the front swaybar mount. Lots of swiss cheese lightening holes… it is probably fine with the stock bar but when you upgrade to a stiffer bar you MUST lose the mount. I strongly suggest you contact Widefoot and purchase their swaybar mount.

I spent some time looking at rear bars. Remember it is important to keep the rear a bit soft to provide traction. (I run my front shocks 7 clicks from full soft and my rear 2 clicks from full soft). After doing my homework I decided to go with the Tanabe 20 MM hollow rear bar. It is up 36% from my 93 bar. I haven’t been ontrack with either but think they will work well considering my spring rate is up a bit over 60%.

Continuing talking hardware… There are lots of bushings in the FD. Most of them should be just left alone. I would not change any bushings in the front. In the rear there are two sets of bushings that should be changed.

The lower longitudinal link that absorbs all the braking and acceleration has a big fat rubber bushing in the front. It needs to be replaced. I really like the beautiful aluminum OEM suspension members and consequently removed the bushing and substituted a nylon item. It is also easy just to replace the link with an aftermarket item that employs a spherical bushing. If you don’t replace this bushing your wheels will be toeing in and out on acceleration and braking.

The other set of bushings are the two at the top of the differential. If you place a jack under the diff you will find it moves up almost an inch before the car starts rising. A big no no. lots of driveline chatter. Nylon works for me.

I believe there may be a higher durometer (stiffer) bushing available from Mazda. That would work.

some replace the rear toe links. while there may be a miniscule amount of non metal in the spherical bearings they look solid to me so i am fine with stock.

Tires of course are a key. I suggest running tires that offer a tread width equal to your rim width. I run Enkei NTO3+M wheels. 18 X 9.5 front and 18 X10.5 rear. 255s front, 295s rear.

We certainly will be offered more tire options this year as the market is changing rapidly. Lots of options in the stickier 100-200 UTQG category.

That’s about it for the hardware let’s move on to setup and tuning.

Chassis setup is HUGE. You just have to get interested in it if you care about going fast and having fun at the track. I will give you a nice dual purpose setup and once you get to the track if you want to go fast you will be changing some of the settings.

Alignment of the FD is an easy task for a shop so don’t let them give you a big song and dance about it. Tell them you want the car set to these specs. Period. Further, arrange from the getgo to get a complete printout of the before and after.

Tire pressure 30 front 27 rear
Ride height if you have coil overs should be set at 25 inches at the top of each wheelwell.

Toe in front between a 1/16 and 1/8th inch
Toe in rear zero
Camber front and rear 1.2 degrees negative
Caster equal minimal
Zero rear thrust angle.

Prior to going to the track I suggest you place a tie wrap on each shock absorber piston rod and push each wrap down just before going out. When you come in they will tell you how much travel you are getting.

For one inch of bump at the wheel the shock moves .6 of an inch in the front and .68 in the rear. You are looking for no more roll at the wheel than about two inches.

I recommend if you plan to track your car that you purchase an accurate tire pressure gauge with a bleed valve and a pyrometer. You are almost blind at the track without a pyrometer. Good digital pyrometers can be bought for approx $150 and are essential.


Set your air pressure and run 3-4 laps. Pit, check your tire temps immediately, and your pressures after… record all 3 temperatures from each tire. You want 20 degrees more temperature on the inside third of each tire. If you don’t have it you need to adjust your camber. I do it at the track in a few minutes.

The pyrometer will tell you the correct tire pressure for each corner of the car. All will be different.

That’s about it for now. I hope this will be of help. It has worked for me.

howard coleman
Fantastic thread !
I'm thinking to buy TEIN Type N1 Coilover FD3S with 8 KG front and 6 KG rear spring ....
My question is with your experience how could be the best spring rate for a RACE only ( not street use ) FD3S with 2,450 lbs weight including driver with 270-285 hp natural aspirated.
Old 05-15-10, 06:58 PM
  #683  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
i don't have an answer for you due to too many variables.

i do have a way to find the answer however. try 12/10s because your car is light. remove the rubber sleeve around the shock rod. place a tie wrap on the shock rod.

push it all the way down. do 3 laps. check the amount the tie wrap was pushed up. this is your travel. you want 2 inches of travel at the wheel which is 1.2 on the front shock rod and 1.4 on the rear. change springs if you need to.

howard
Old 05-18-10, 02:30 AM
  #684  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
aoc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So under what circumstances would you run the higher rates?
Old 05-18-10, 07:55 AM
  #685  
the implications matter

iTrader: (1)
 
frijolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Howard,

Stupid question but an honest one. Any downside to loosing the rubber boot at the top of the shock entirely? The boot keeps out dust and helps keep the seal's work to a minimum, but having it in place really makes the zip tie trick hard to use.

-Joel
Old 05-18-10, 08:43 AM
  #686  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
"under what circumstances would you run the higher rates?"

1. less body roll from higher rate springs does NOT transfer less weight to the outside tires in a turn. lateral weight transfer is effected my CG and track NOT roll.

2. (relatively) softer springs provides increased "feel" for the chassis traction limits. the stiffer the chassis the LESS communication to the driver as to breakaway.

3. a stiffer chassis might initially feel faster but if it is too stiff it will be slower.

4. there certainly is "too soft" re spring rates. the tie wrap will show too much travel. there can also be wheelwell interference w tires if too much travel. you do not want to get into a situation, however, because you have the wrong offset where you are forced to jack up the spring rate to much to kill roll due to interference. fix the offset.

5. if you have a dual purpose car too much spring rate can be highly bothersome on the street. proper springrate encourages the tire to (almost) always be in contact w the road surface. too stiff makes the tire chatter over bumps. chatter like being in the air alot. too stiff rates encourage you to leave your dual purpose car in the garage and drive the barge. no way to live when you could be out w a smile on your face zipping around. think long and hard before jacking up spring rates. it is actually less than an hour of fairly clean work to swap springs for a track day. the real world, you know, streets... has lots of bumps.



"Stupid question but an honest one. Any downside to loosing the rubber boot at the top of the shock entirely? The boot keeps out dust and helps keep the seal's work to a minimum, but having it in place really makes the zip tie trick hard to use."

not a stupid question, actually a great question.

yes there is a downside to removing the rubber boot that keeps dust etc from getting on the shockrod and eventually (maybe) damaging the upper seal on the shock body. i do not advise dual purpose apps to continuosly run w no shock rod cover. if your car is all track you should pitch it forever. if you are dual purpose remove it and go to the track and learn what you need to learn. once the process is complete reinstall it. there is no harm in running without it on the street for shortish periods of time.

howard
Old 05-18-10, 09:22 AM
  #687  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
A big "when" is related to tires. How much your car rolls, dives, and squats on street tires (even big ones) is alot different from how it will on 285 Hoosier R6's or anything in between.

500/400 worked great for me on streets, was still OK on Victoracers, but started rubbing, scraping and feeling like a banana with Hoosiers. 650/500 is where I am at the moment.
Old 05-18-10, 12:42 PM
  #688  
the implications matter

iTrader: (1)
 
frijolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Howard,

After re-reading some of this thread I decided to calculate out 4 wheel weight transfer for a variety of spring and swaybar rates. I ended up putting together a spreadsheet and solving for weight transfer using matrix math. This meant I first had to solve for the effective torsional spring rates of the swaybars in question but the results were kinda neat.

It'll even show you the point at which you expect to float a particular tire. Unfortunatley the big assumption you're forced to make is that A) corner is steady state (no acceleration or braking) and B) no chassis twist occurs (which really would be a spring rate unto itself). I still think this will be pretty helpful in allowing more precise comparisons to any setup I've run previously. At a minimum it predicts the hole I want to run for my speedway bar I'm building. I'm attaching a couple screen caps if you want to check the theory behind my math.

-Joel Payne

PS I disagree with you on one very minor point. Unsprung weight still results in weight transfer (and should not be subtracted in your example calc in post #1) because it has a CG above ground. You said it yourself: If you welded everything solid weight transfer would still occur (and the entire car would be unsprung weight). Am I missing something?
Attached Thumbnails howard coleman's FD Chassis/Setup-swaybar-equations.jpg   howard coleman's FD Chassis/Setup-swaybar-calcs.jpg  
Old 05-18-10, 02:10 PM
  #689  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
Pasadena....

it figures.
Old 05-18-10, 07:29 PM
  #690  
CYD
Senior Member

 
CYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 364
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
OR

Originally Posted by Callsign_Vega
Howard, great read. I beleive you just laid out exactly what I will buy for my suspension. Would anything in your post change significantly if say I ran 285's front and 345's rear with a wide-body kit?
Was this question answered?


I will be running
285/30/18 Fronts (24.7" Diameter)
335/30/18 Rears (25.9" Diameter)

Currently on stock, with 245/45/16 Front/Rear the Diameter is 24.7"

Now the fronts will retain the stock Diameter at 24.7"
Unfortunately however, the rear is larger at 25.9" I suppose on lower tire pressure I could lower it but not sure I want to do that or adjust something else.

How would your recommendations change with a larger rear tire diameter if at all?

Thanks,

~CYD
Old 05-19-10, 05:33 AM
  #691  
the implications matter

iTrader: (1)
 
frijolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
Pasadena....

it figures.
I'm no relation to Cal Tech if that's what you're alluding to. I do like having an objective baseline of how I'm changing things. I never realized exactly how much the heavy front swaybar changed weight transfer. The rear bars only change the numbers slightly but the difference in feel is much larger.

It also explains why my friend who ran an HPDE with no front bar was having such a hard time.

-Joel
Old 05-19-10, 07:39 AM
  #692  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
re Pasadena... Cal Tech... just trying to inject some humor. i am insanely busy for a few days but look forward to your calcs.

during one of my Runoffs at Road Atlanta i was doing a final chassis setup the night before the race and had the car on the 4 scales. i had disconnected the front bar as i was jacking some weight around. lots of people were stopping by and i got to doing too much socializing. i forgot to reconnect the front bar link!

i knew i was totally screwed on the pace lap. with less roll stiffness in the front i burned up my rear tires in 4 laps of racing and parked it.

another racing lesson learned.

racing is the ultimate task master. it teaches so many lessons.

after seriously racing for 22 seasons it is absolutely impossible for me to do anything 95%. the other 5% will always come 'a calling.

thanks for your contribution and i look forward to playing w it.

howard
Old 05-19-10, 03:32 PM
  #693  
Full Member

iTrader: (4)
 
REDBULLSTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
great thread..... i have learned alot. keep up the good work
Old 05-19-10, 07:16 PM
  #694  
Rotary Freak

 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Howard,
I think I got my suspension dial in pretty well. I ended up raising my height back to around 26" since my strut was hitting the bump stop causing the car to hop at corners. I also changed my rear spring to 700lb from 600lb and left my front to 800lb. I reset everything to soft on all 4 corners on both damper and rebound and slowly readjust it 3 clicks at a time till I felt a slight oversteer in the rear. here're the result on 2 laps at the track. I lost about 200rwhp because the turbo gasket blew in session 2 and I didn't notice it till I was at the track and only seeing 5-7psi when I normally run 21psi of boost. Tire pressure is around 22psi hot and around 17psi cold. To give you an idea, my best lap was 2:21/lap. If you watch the video, I was running 2:30/lap in my 2nd lap running only 7psi. I can barely keep up with the mini and lotus in acceleration.

http://s371.photobucket.com/albums/o...rent=msr31.flv



Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
re Pasadena... Cal Tech... just trying to inject some humor. i am insanely busy for a few days but look forward to your calcs.

during one of my Runoffs at Road Atlanta i was doing a final chassis setup the night before the race and had the car on the 4 scales. i had disconnected the front bar as i was jacking some weight around. lots of people were stopping by and i got to doing too much socializing. i forgot to reconnect the front bar link!

i knew i was totally screwed on the pace lap. with less roll stiffness in the front i burned up my rear tires in 4 laps of racing and parked it.

another racing lesson learned.

racing is the ultimate task master. it teaches so many lessons.

after seriously racing for 22 seasons it is absolutely impossible for me to do anything 95%. the other 5% will always come 'a calling.

thanks for your contribution and i look forward to playing w it.

howard
Old 05-27-10, 08:06 AM
  #695  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
i was unable to play the vid. "files structure invalid" whatever that means.

i like that you are juggling springs and that your tire pressure is low.

i would be very interested in what you are actually getting for travel at the shockrod. also tire temps and your tire pressure after 3 hard laps.

hc
Old 05-27-10, 10:26 PM
  #696  
Rotary Freak

 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Howard,
You should be able to play the file using adobe flash player. anyways, I did measure those info after 3 laps. I was getting around 1.6-1.8" of travel on my shocks and my tire temp after 3 laps is around 160F



Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
i was unable to play the vid. "files structure invalid" whatever that means.

i like that you are juggling springs and that your tire pressure is low.

i would be very interested in what you are actually getting for travel at the shockrod. also tire temps and your tire pressure after 3 hard laps.

hc

Last edited by pluto; 05-27-10 at 10:31 PM.
Old 05-31-10, 11:17 AM
  #697  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
the next item is 3 temps on each tire after 3 (or thereabouts) laps. also, starting tire pressures and ending on all 4.
Old 06-09-10, 02:17 PM
  #698  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sigfrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Need simple help

I am trying to read up but thought I would ask and hopefully not get flamed. My stock shocks went completely dead and I decided to change them. During removal I noticed most bushings were gone so I replaced almost all of them with Delrin units. I found a used set of KYB GR-2's, bought all new upper mounts, etc. and installed everything with RB springs. The car sat extremely low and the ride was aweful. The car does not want to turn well and the freeway ride made me bob so much I stopped driving the car. I installed the stock (or so I think they are) springs and the car sits like a truck. The ride is barely better (from a bobing perspective) but nothing I would call pleasant. So here is what I have:

93 base model
Car weight is 2800 with no driver
Car has an LT1 and T56 in it
All delrin bushings except for rear toe link and upper and lower ball joints front and back that are stock and old
GR-2 shocks
Racing Beat springs
18" HEAVY rims with 255 up front and 285 rears
2nd gen manual steering rack

The car rode much better with the stock shocks and I am not sure what I shoudl try next without spending too much money. I am looking for a great street set-up that can do HPDE classes 4 or 5 times a year.

Any help / direction would be greatly appreciated. This is now the 3rd time I take everything apart and I would like to prepare and do this right. Thanks,

Sigfrid
Old 06-09-10, 03:33 PM
  #699  
Captain Safety

iTrader: (1)
 
hyperlitenerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, Ca
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sigfrid,

*disclaimer* I am not an expert.

To me it sounds like you have some bad shocks. Try pushing on one of the corners of the car a few times then see if it keeps bouncing with out you. If so, chances are your shocks are no good, or are on their way out.
Old 06-09-10, 04:28 PM
  #700  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sigfrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
weird handling

Thanks for the feedback. The shocks are so stiff that I cannot move the car. They were used so it is possible. When I got them, the rods where all the way in and it took 2 people to get them to expand. It is hard on a 7 to test a shock by pushing on the car anyway and I highly recommend that no one does that as they will most likely make a dent on their fenders. These cars are not made with thick steel. I do appreciate the feedback. Thanks,

Sigfrid


Quick Reply: howard coleman's FD Chassis/Setup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.