Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

17" vs 18"...which is better for the fd?

Old May 18, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #26  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
i should be getting my 18s soon so ill post my feedback later on lol
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #27  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO


Originally Posted by 2slow4u
does anybody have pictures of a fd with 17s and another withs 18s so i can see how different they look?
18's on the red FD in the front, 17's on the next red FD.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #28  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
I've owned virtually every 17 or 18" combo, and there is always compromise in anything depending on use. You can't get one combo thats the "best" for every occasion.

Do 18" wheels mean a compromise in straight-line traction or ride quality? Not necessarily. If you put 30-series tires on them, probably a bit on both counts. If you run a 35-series combo, I don't believe so, allowing for variations in tire brands.

Are 17" wheels lighter? Not necessarily. My 18x10" BBS is lighter than my 17x9" SSR integral. But, nothing is as light as my 17x9.5 SSR comps. However, the 275/40/17 tires on both of my 17" SSR's are heavier than the 275/35/18 on my BBS.

What's better for track use? Tough one. The "in" combo for tracking is 18x10 w/ 285/30 all around. I've got 275/40 all around on 17x9.5's. There's definately a clearance issue up front... so my combo is lighter and cheaper and handles great, but a little less convenient. I'd say that since ride and launch traction are not issues here, that 18 gets the nod on overall performance if you can afford them.

Finally, With 18" wheels becoming the standard, you are starting to get more choices with regartd to models, aspects, and widths with 18" wheels... both for street and track. Generally speaking, you can get wider widths with more aspect choices with 18, and you can actually get more clearance with 18" wheels to fit around trailing arms, etc.

On ballance, i'd say 18" are better. However, for the thread starter who wants to drag race... maybe 17's are better if your only going to have one set.
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #29  
potatochobit's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
17 are better for the street and overall ride enjoyment in my opinion. tire sidewall height and stiffness makes a huge impact also.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #30  
2slow4u's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: NJ
after seeing those pics, 18s look soooo much better on the fd imo.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #31  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by 2slow4u
after seeing those pics, 18s look soooo much better on the fd imo.
It really depends on the rim (and the suspension setup). Some 18's will make the car look like it has "dubs" or "bigfoot" wheels. Others won't.
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 10:12 PM
  #32  
Sacker90's Avatar
Aint no broke nigga
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Seymour, TN
My 18's look kinda big from a distance but look really good close up...
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:37 AM
  #33  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I think the 17/18 comparison pic exaggerates the difference, too, since the car with 17s is further away from the camera.

-Max
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #34  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by maxcooper
I think the 17/18 comparison pic exaggerates the difference, too, since the car with 17s is further away from the camera.

-Max
Yes, I agree as well.

Here's a closer pic of the 17's:



They fill up the fenderwell nicely, IMO.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #35  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
Honestly, I liked the looks of my 17" fikse's from 3/4 angles and such (like the photo above), but from profile, they just looked too small. I think the only time 18's look funny is if the car isn't lowered, and/or the tires are super-low profile. Both accentuate the "dub" look.

Done right, they look way better than 17's.
Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #36  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO


Better pic....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lepprykaun
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Jan 19, 2011 06:32 PM
finishline
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
May 28, 2009 02:19 PM
saeedm
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Jan 1, 2008 11:10 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.