Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

17" vs 18"...which is better for the fd?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-05, 08:33 AM
  #26  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i should be getting my 18s soon so ill post my feedback later on lol
Old 05-18-05, 09:42 AM
  #27  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts


Originally Posted by 2slow4u
does anybody have pictures of a fd with 17s and another withs 18s so i can see how different they look?
18's on the red FD in the front, 17's on the next red FD.
Old 05-18-05, 09:54 AM
  #28  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,049
Received 519 Likes on 284 Posts
I've owned virtually every 17 or 18" combo, and there is always compromise in anything depending on use. You can't get one combo thats the "best" for every occasion.

Do 18" wheels mean a compromise in straight-line traction or ride quality? Not necessarily. If you put 30-series tires on them, probably a bit on both counts. If you run a 35-series combo, I don't believe so, allowing for variations in tire brands.

Are 17" wheels lighter? Not necessarily. My 18x10" BBS is lighter than my 17x9" SSR integral. But, nothing is as light as my 17x9.5 SSR comps. However, the 275/40/17 tires on both of my 17" SSR's are heavier than the 275/35/18 on my BBS.

What's better for track use? Tough one. The "in" combo for tracking is 18x10 w/ 285/30 all around. I've got 275/40 all around on 17x9.5's. There's definately a clearance issue up front... so my combo is lighter and cheaper and handles great, but a little less convenient. I'd say that since ride and launch traction are not issues here, that 18 gets the nod on overall performance if you can afford them.

Finally, With 18" wheels becoming the standard, you are starting to get more choices with regartd to models, aspects, and widths with 18" wheels... both for street and track. Generally speaking, you can get wider widths with more aspect choices with 18, and you can actually get more clearance with 18" wheels to fit around trailing arms, etc.

On ballance, i'd say 18" are better. However, for the thread starter who wants to drag race... maybe 17's are better if your only going to have one set.
Old 05-19-05, 03:20 PM
  #29  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
potatochobit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17 are better for the street and overall ride enjoyment in my opinion. tire sidewall height and stiffness makes a huge impact also.
Old 05-21-05, 09:01 AM
  #30  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
2slow4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
after seeing those pics, 18s look soooo much better on the fd imo.
Old 05-21-05, 01:11 PM
  #31  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by 2slow4u
after seeing those pics, 18s look soooo much better on the fd imo.
It really depends on the rim (and the suspension setup). Some 18's will make the car look like it has "dubs" or "bigfoot" wheels. Others won't.
Old 05-22-05, 10:12 PM
  #32  
Aint no broke nigga
 
Sacker90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 18's look kinda big from a distance but look really good close up...
Old 05-23-05, 04:37 AM
  #33  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I think the 17/18 comparison pic exaggerates the difference, too, since the car with 17s is further away from the camera.

-Max
Old 05-23-05, 08:23 AM
  #34  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by maxcooper
I think the 17/18 comparison pic exaggerates the difference, too, since the car with 17s is further away from the camera.

-Max
Yes, I agree as well.

Here's a closer pic of the 17's:



They fill up the fenderwell nicely, IMO.
Old 05-23-05, 08:31 AM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,049
Received 519 Likes on 284 Posts
Honestly, I liked the looks of my 17" fikse's from 3/4 angles and such (like the photo above), but from profile, they just looked too small. I think the only time 18's look funny is if the car isn't lowered, and/or the tires are super-low profile. Both accentuate the "dub" look.

Done right, they look way better than 17's.
Old 05-30-05, 10:16 PM
  #36  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts


Better pic....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lepprykaun
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
01-19-11 06:32 PM
finishline
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
05-28-09 02:19 PM
saeedm
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
01-01-08 11:10 AM



Quick Reply: 17" vs 18"...which is better for the fd?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.