Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Yet another GT42/Halfbridge...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 02:32 AM
  #51  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
That inlet manifold has an interesting effect on the tq curve given the boost is flat as you mentioned. Good numbers for the power its 58rwhp up on a T2 block street port running normal intake manifolds and a small TO4S turbo at same peak power revs on the same dyno type (pump fuel 100%, street 3" exhaust and air filter attached 473raxelhp @ same boost).

PS your fab is great, being a machinist myself can appreciate it nice job for first up TIG too !
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 02:44 AM
  #52  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by RICE RACING
That inlet manifold has an interesting effect on the tq curve given the boost is flat as you mentioned.
I've been noticing similar effects with the same type of intake manifold designs.
It's mainly due to the plenun.
The secret though is to keep carrying the power to much higher rpms to compliment the high torque peak.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #53  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally Posted by Trjackson
Here is a lil sumpin, sumpin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLW7wyoamJ8

Ty



That's a bad *** setup

BTW - Nice numbers!
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #54  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Asleep
Excellent results! The Dynapak reads lower that a Dynojet, correct?! Wow. Let me know when you're in town again and let's line them up!

Tony

P.S. Props to Trjackson on his vids/pics
it reads about 10% lower from what we've seen so far. I must say from what ive seen that both dynos are very consistent, just not with each other. My car made 12 more rwhp at rx7store with 2 less psi (from 360->372). another FD broke the 300whp mark on the rx7store dyno while it only made 280 or so on the defined dyno a few weeks earlier (the exact number escapes me).

nate, the car is nice. i need a ride in it when the alternator isnt being a ho.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #55  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
was that all on stock ignition?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 01:18 AM
  #56  
Trjackson's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Asleep
Excellent results! The Dynapak reads lower that a Dynojet, correct?! Wow. Let me know when you're in town again and let's line them up!

Tony

P.S. Props to Trjackson on his vids/pics

Tony, thanks for the kinds words.

Here is another vid of his car. The footage could be better, but delslow's car was throwing me around like a little bitch!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkG_XF-q1HI

Ty
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #57  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by dregg100
was that all on stock ignition?
Sadly, and surprisingly yes. I had my hands full to keep the tune just right to avoid any weak spark events. Nice vid though, glad to see it kicking butt!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #58  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
that thing rips
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #59  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
what radius bends were used when you fabbed your manifold? would you be interested in making another one of those duel walbro setups for me by chance? pm me.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #60  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
nice video ty, nate's car sounds super weird on it for some reason. like, a sound you'd hear on an atari. it sounds sweet in person though so who cares.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #61  
DelSlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Hot Dicken's Cider
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Marion, Ohio
Yea, it sounds completly different in person
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #62  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Awesome fabrication work !

Talent clearly shows... and nice numbers :-)

Just not clear on one thing...
Video states 398rwt ..... I believe it to be wrong since torque barely went past 300.
Strange how your torque is peaking exactly same rpm as horsepower, usually a clear indication of boost creep but with that custom intake things change.

What happened after 7600rpm?
horsepower curve took quite a drop.

Enjoy the new found horsepower:-)
JD
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:03 AM
  #63  
Trjackson's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Yeah, I filmed and edited the vid, It was a typo, I was so tired when I was editing, and I didn't catch till after I loaded it on youtube.

Ty
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #64  
88rxn/a's Avatar
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
so wait a tic!!
stock coils and race gas and thats it!?!?!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #65  
DelSlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Hot Dicken's Cider
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Marion, Ohio
Yea... ummm... if you don't think your going to use that FC-3000, just let me know and I'll buy it back from you.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #66  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,553
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
I have a feeling I am just wasting time with my r85 setup and should go this route. Congrats on the numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #67  
88rxn/a's Avatar
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
Originally Posted by DelSlow
Yea... ummm... if you don't think your going to use that FC-3000, just let me know and I'll buy it back from you.
i thought i was gonna need it for the old HP #'s you had with the turbo i bought from you!?
let me think about it....i just might
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #68  
shm21284's Avatar
Fabrineer
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by DelSlow
T-von, I see what your saying now. I remember reading that thread quite some time ago and I've also read Maximum Boost several times. I agree with you that a "Y" split would provide maximum flow to the wastegate runner, but I felt that putting the wastegate runners on outside of the bend vs the side would disrupt flow in the main runner. I set up a ghetto rig with compressed air to test out the flow through it, and it felt like there was about 1/3 of the airflow coming out of the wastegate runner vs the main runner. When I blew air backwards(from the turbine side) it actually sucked air into the wastegate.

Guess I'll find out how it does this saturday when I get a pump gas tune done.
I agree. As I saw it in person, he had no boost control issues on either 12 lbs or 18 lbs.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2007 | 02:28 AM
  #69  
joe-c's Avatar
YOUR MOM IS MY ADDICTION
Tenured Member 15 Years
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 1
From: STOCKTON, CA / VENTURA, CA
nice setup man
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.