Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

What can you tell me about the Apexi RX6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 03:40 PM
  #1  
cib24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 14
From: UK
What can you tell me about the Apexi RX6?

From the little information I have found on here and elsewhere, it wasn't ever a very common turbo for the FD but it is a ball bearing unit good for something around 400 horsepower. However, I can't seem to find the specs, dyno results and general driving opinions from previous owners.

I ask for more information aout this turbo for two reasons:

1. There is a used one with a P27 turbine housing for sale in my market for a very good price (full kit with manifold, downpipe, oil lines and wastegate); and

2. My twins might have given up the ghost so it is worth thinking about a single swap now.

My car is a weekend toy which sees about 10-12 track days per year and the twins are fun except for the very top end above 7k where it falls off a cliff. I have a stock motor with OEM Mazda seals with an average of 7.6 bar (c.110 PSI) on the front rotor and 8.0 bar (c.114PSI) on the rear rotor.

I think 350-400 horsepower is probably enough for this type of driving and would also allow me to simply run a larger SMIC than stock so I can keep the battery in the engine bay and just upgrade the secondary injectors to 1680s.

But what are the pros and cons of the RX6 compared to say a T04S, T04E/S hybrid or a GT35R? Are they rebuildable if necessary? Although that probably isn't much of a concern for singles anyway.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
shawnm565's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 889
Likes: 14
From: Minnesota
Its not a rebuild-able turbo to my knowledge. They are prone to a short life because of the very small turbine wheel & housing.

If memory serves me correctly its like a GT35R with an even smaller turbine wheel.

Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
cib24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 14
From: UK
Originally Posted by shawnm565
Its not a rebuild-able turbo to my knowledge. They are prone to a short life because of the very small turbine wheel & housing.

If memory serves me correctly its like a GT35R with an even smaller turbine wheel.

Adaptronic Powered Apexi Rx6 Single Turbo FD3S 380rwhp - YouTube
Thanks. Does the small turbine housing imply high heat? Would my AEM water injection kit do enough to keep EGTs in check?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
Jason's Avatar
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
I have installed a few of those and tuned them, but its been years. As I remember it spooled quick and made pretty good power (400+). Not rebuild-able which is a huge downside.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
The Rx6 is made by IHI, the same supplier that makes the stock turbo on Subarus (except the new direct injected engine). Since it's not part of a more common line of turbos for aftermarket use there's not a lot of support for it.

I'm sure you can get a newer generation turbo from BorgWarner or Garrett or whatever that will meet your needs and have better support.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 10:21 AM
  #6  
cib24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 14
From: UK
Fair enough. Seems like it's a decent turbo but quite old and little to no support for it. I'll pass on it and weigh up my options with respect to swapping in some used twins (99 spec abraidable like my current ones or not) or converting to a single and looking for a good deal on a GT35r or older Garret turbo like a T04S. The EFR stuff is just too pricey to justify since the older turbos seem to be 80-90% of an EFR for a lot less and will more than satisfy my requirements.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 12:30 PM
  #7  
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 256
^ im glad to see someone else liking the old school turbos. The EFRs are nice but like you said pricey.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
My job is to blow **** up
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 5
From: palmyra Indiana
Originally Posted by Johnny Kommavongsa
^ im glad to see someone else liking the old school turbos. The EFRs are nice but like you said pricey.
new turbos are better period. if you want cheap look at the SXE line.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 12:52 PM
  #9  
cib24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 14
From: UK
Originally Posted by Johnny Kommavongsa
^ im glad to see someone else liking the old school turbos. The EFRs are nice but like you said pricey.
Well, everyone likes new things which is why most people upgrade their phone every year, but if the old stuff is nearly as good and is proven to work and be reliable then it really doesn't make economic sense to fork over the cash for the latest and greatest tech.

Sure, the EFRs are more responsive and the IWG units are a bit more simple in construction to make plumbing easier, but on a drag strip or a track they won't make much difference (or more power) compared to an older turbo with similar dimensions because you are almost always in boost in those situations. And at that point you are pretty much limited by the size of the housings, A/R and other traditional turbo specs.

At least that is how I see it and for me I could care less about responsiveness on the street since I am limited by so many speed cameras in and around London and the UK that I end up driving like a grandpa on public roads and only get to enjoy the full potential of my car on the track.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 01:11 PM
  #10  
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 256
Originally Posted by lastphaseofthis
new turbos are better period. if you want cheap look at the SXE line.
I’m sure they work better.

Problem I’ve seen with BW turbos is they are physically big.

I prefer to have a single waste gate cast manifold for my setup and the BW turbos won’t fit without banging on the firewall or notching it for clearance.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #11  
shawnm565's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 889
Likes: 14
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Johnny Kommavongsa
I’m sure they work better.

Problem I’ve seen with BW turbos is they are physically big.

I prefer to have a single waste gate cast manifold for my setup and the BW turbos won’t fit without banging on the firewall or notching it for clearance.
The S300SXE are quite big, GT40 sized. However the S200 is not big at all if looking for a 350-400rwhp setup;

BorgWarner SXE

If you need even smaller compressor sizing(To4S);

http://www.turbosource.com/Turblown-...4-23-78398.htm
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #12  
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 256
^ this was a s256. it was hitting the lim and frame rail. Name:  20150831_203305_zpsi4yzqily.jpg
Views: 1155
Size:  477.7 KB

this was a t04s. flat blade between. the frame rail ans turbo to show how much room was there.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 04:30 PM
  #13  
96fd3s's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 5
From: NZ
Gotta admit though, a huge turbo in the engine bay looks pretty sweet =D
^simply the wrong manifold for the job. I Run a S300 and its fine. No banging or nothing of anything.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
cib24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 14
From: UK
Originally Posted by Johnny Kommavongsa
^ this was a s256. it was hitting the lim and frame rail.

this was a t04s. flat blade between. the frame rail ans turbo to show how much room was there.
Low down manifolds are sweet! You can keep the air pump and it also looks more stealth.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2016 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
Johnny Kommavongsa's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 256
Originally Posted by 96fd3s
Gotta admit though, a huge turbo in the engine bay looks pretty sweet =D
^simply the wrong manifold for the job. I Run a S300 and its fine. No banging or nothing of anything.
but you run a modified manifold with dual wastegates.

I wanted to use a manifold with a single wastegate for simplicity.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2016 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
My job is to blow **** up
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 5
From: palmyra Indiana
either way.. an s256 on a to4 manifold ist going to fit as well as a to4 on a to4 manifold. just get a compatible manifold for single waste
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2016 | 10:06 AM
  #17  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by cib24
From the little information I have found on here and elsewhere, it wasn't ever a very common turbo for the FD but it is a ball bearing unit good for something around 400 horsepower. However, I can't seem to find the specs, dyno results and general driving opinions from previous owners.

Thanks.
its been a LONG time, but here is the scoop.

Apex'i offered these kits in a couple of flavors. the early kits had a long manifold that placed the turbo approximately where the air pump would have been, the later kits had a short manifold, and thus fit with the air pump, so it could be fully emissions legal if needed.

the Rx6 turbo came with two exhaust housings, although in the states we weren't generally offered the choice. the Rx6 itself is an IHI turbo, ball bearing, its oil cooled only. its a T3 flange (i think), exhaust is really small.

it spools quickly, and did something like 340rwhp@12psi on a car with a stock engine, bigger IC and full exhaust being the only other mods

there also was another very rare kit with a bigger turbo, and a water cooled waste gate, it was good for 380hp@12psi, or there abouts
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 11:26 PM
  #18  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
Very quick spooling turbo, but won't make much more power than the twins. The tiny exhaust side creates a lot of back pressure and therefore heat. Its good for people who just want to replace the twins with a super responsive single for simplicity. The biggest downside is I don't think anyone has parts available for it should it fail on you. If you find a good one cheap and don't care for a lot of power, then go for it. Otherwise I feel there are much better options these days.
Reply
Old May 28, 2016 | 11:19 AM
  #19  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
I have this kit on my FD and have about 40,000 miles onit and it hasnt failed me so far. I made 378rwhp on 91 octane with this kit. It spools very quickly, almost as quickly as the stock twins but if you are looking to make more than 400rwhp there are other turbos that will get you there.
Reply
Old May 28, 2016 | 08:50 PM
  #20  
tys93r1fd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 2
From: Brampton, ON Canada
I have the same turbo on my FD made 380+whp here's a dyno chart.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 08:07 AM
  #21  
tys93r1fd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 2
From: Brampton, ON Canada







Here's a couple pics of what it looks like installed
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toyzforme
Haltech Forum
7
Feb 22, 2016 10:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.