Is this possible?
01-03-07, 03:45 PM
#3
development
01-04-07, 10:26 AM
#7
Greek Geek
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greece - Athens [www.RX7.gr]
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by RETed
The turbo should be able to do it.
What about fuel rail pressures?
If it's bumped up a bit, then it is possible.
-Ted
What about fuel rail pressures?
If it's bumped up a bit, then it is possible.
-Ted
Fuel rail is stock and I don't remember the fuel pressure (besides that there is an FPR in the circuit).
But with 4x850cc injectors? Even at 100%?
At 15psi?
Trending Topics
01-04-07, 04:50 PM
#12
Greek Geek
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greece - Athens [www.RX7.gr]
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
well take a look at the dyno. Torgue is ~59kgr! and bhp is ~500@6300. The dynoshop had to stop the test because it was already too late... 
And the exhaust could wake up a whole neighborhood.
anyway, to these numbers look possible?
And the exhaust could wake up a whole neighborhood.anyway, to these numbers look possible?
01-10-07, 09:10 AM
#17
boost > *
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: buffalo, ny
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not unreliable, they just read higher than roller style dynos. in comparison, a mustang dyno will read the lowest. still solid numbers tho, #'s are overrated anyways as long as it drives good and the curve is smooth is what matters 
01-10-07, 09:30 AM
#18
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by adictd2b00st
not unreliable, they just read higher than roller style dynos. in comparison, a mustang dyno will read the lowest. still solid numbers tho, #'s are overrated anyways as long as it drives good and the curve is smooth is what matters
01-10-07, 04:40 PM
#20
Apply clever comment here
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post Falls ID
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to be argumentative, but dose it matter? Are you going to notice a 1% to 2% difference between them? Like adictd2b00st said, numbers are overrated.
01-10-07, 08:00 PM
#21
boost > *
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: buffalo, ny
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Where did you hear that? I was told my a dynapack owner/operator that they tend to read a bit lower than dynojets, he claimed that numerous times customer cars would put down a higher rwhp figure on a dynojet after they left his dynapack. Not sure about the validity of that, but he seemed pretty matter-of-fact about it.
i'm just saying, TYPICALLY from what i've witnessed a dynapack will read higher. case in point about correction factors (and i know this is VERY extreme) when i had my car on the dyno last (this particular one was a dyno dynamics) we were getting REALLY good numbers in relation to boost levels..... and then the owner of the shop remembered that he had set the correction high for a customer car who dyno'd ~750whp and wanted a dyno chart to "get his friends" that read 1000whp, and forgot to turn it back down after the fact, and my car happened to be the next one to use the dyno.
