Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Partial T78 coversion problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
RrrracerX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wannabe
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Indpls
Partial T78 coversion problem

I won't go into any gory details as to why, but I had an FD in here for a motor swap. When the turbos were removed they were found to be cracked beyond repair. The customer opted to get a T78 kit on his own and have us put it on. The rest of the car is largely stock; factory ECU, factory intercooler, factory injectors, factory fuel pump. Vacuum rail and emissions equipment have been removed. Engine is OE Mazda reman. I advised him I was unsure of the compatibility of the T78 and the stock parts.

The car starts and idles just fine. When driven, however, anything over ~15% throttle and it bogs down as if it were not getting enough fuel. Falls flat on it's face actually. Has anyone else run into a situation similar to this, or know of incompatabilities in his existing setup that could cause this driveability problem? We're not getting into boost at all, this is all during part throttle applications. It acts like maybe a clogged fuel filter.

Thanks
Shane
www.aimtuning.com
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #2  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Did you resistor all of the stuff you removed?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 03:20 PM
  #3  
RrrracerX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wannabe
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Indpls
Nope, no resistors. We did end up getting codes 35, 43 and 44, all turbo control codes. Is it possible that the ECU is not finding something it is looking for and going into limp home mode? All the standard inputs are hooked up (intake air, coolant temp, MAP, etc...) Unfortunately we've never tried to make one work with the stock ECU so this is all speculation.

Shane
www.aimtuning.com
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #4  
1point3liter's Avatar
Twin Turbo LSX
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, Fl
Put the resisters in place and it should fix the problem. He really needs at minumum engine management, intercooler, injectors, and a fuel pump. I exspect that motor to last more than a week or two max with his setup.

Last edited by 1point3liter; Apr 23, 2003 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 04:50 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
if the ecu is unsure about boost control or fuel it will, have a cow

mike
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #6  
RrrracerX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wannabe
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Indpls
Originally posted by 1point3liter
Put the resisters in place and it should fix the problem. He really needs at minumum engine management, intercooler, injectors, and a fuel pump.
I agree completely with your assessment of what it needs. The engine and turbo conversion have exceeded his budget, however. This reaffirms my suspicion that the ECU is in limp home mode. He is taking it easy driving the car (no choice really), but I am going to bring it back in for more inspection. I really need to find a solution.

Provided we can get it driveable at more than 20% throttle, our objective is to artificially limit the output from the T78 until he can have the necessary upgrades performed.

For now though, I'm trying to help him find a solution that will not cost much and render the car at least driveable, if not massively powerful.

Presumably then, replacing the missing resistance values would at least let the factory ECU operate somewhat normally and hopefully restore some driveability to the car.

Anyone know on exactly which circuits? Anyone have a list of resistance values handy? C'mon, I'm not asking for much LOL

Time to start digging in The Manual.

Shane
www.aimtuning.com

Last edited by RrrracerX7; Apr 23, 2003 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by RrrracerX7
I agree completely with your assessment of what it needs. The engine and turbo conversion have exceeded his budget, however. This reaffirms my suspicion that the ECU is in limp home mode. He is taking it easy driving the car (no choice really), but I am going to bring it back in for more inspection. I really need to find a solution.

Provided we can get it driveable at more than 20% throttle, our objective is to artificially limit the output from the T78 until he can have the necessary upgrades performed.

For now though, I'm trying to help him find a solution that will not cost much and render the car at least driveable, if not massively powerful.

Presumably then, replacing the missing resistance values would at least let the factory ECU operate somewhat normally and hopefully restore some driveability to the car.

Anyone know on exactly which circuits? Anyone have a list of resistance values handy? C'mon, I'm not asking for much LOL

Time to start digging in The Manual.

Shane
www.aimtuning.com
if you pull the codes, and look in the manual they list the resistances for you

mike
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 01:02 PM
  #8  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
you can also get a manual boost controller to turnt he boost waaaay down. I think the wastegate spring that comes with the t78 is something like 18 psi.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #9  
es's Avatar
es
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: Jax, Fl.
Even the boost controller wont be able to pull the boost down low enough to make that car at all reliable!

The stock fuel system & that turbo setup is a timebomb.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
RrrracerX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wannabe
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Indpls
A somewhat happy ending to the story. I brought the car back in and plugged in all the solenoids (sans vacuum hoses) and the car is running much better now.

Of course, I advised the customer that he was driving a loaded gun and that his engine would live or die by his right foot until he could afford to get everything it needs!

Thanks for the help guys.

Shane
www.aimtuning.com
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 07:01 AM
  #11  
laujesse's Avatar
Thrashing your Roy score!
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: Japan
Take his key and hide it from him like a drunk driver... He might/should thank you later...

When he gets back form rehab(ie: fuel, computer, intercooler, ect.) you can give it back to him in good concience.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 07:28 AM
  #12  
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
rotary sensei
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 3
From: Virginia
Originally posted by RrrracerX7
A somewhat happy ending to the story. I brought the car back in and plugged in all the solenoids (sans vacuum hoses) and the car is running much better now.

Of course, I advised the customer that he was driving a loaded gun and that his engine would live or die by his right foot until he could afford to get everything it needs!

Thanks for the help guys.

Shane
www.aimtuning.com
That cars engine will last seconds with those non-mods. I hope he has a big wallet...
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #13  
vosko's Avatar
Just Call Me Terminator!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
From: NJ
hmm my T78 was $3500 everything else to make it work properly was only $8000+ hmmm
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #14  
FourtyOunce's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 175
From: Old Bridge, NJ
Originally posted by vosko
hmm my T78 was $3500 everything else to make it work properly was only $8000+ hmmm
In addition to that, half ***'ing a modification like this will likely cost more in the end than actually doing it right from the start.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #15  
vosko's Avatar
Just Call Me Terminator!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
From: NJ
well when he blows the engine it will damage the $2000 turbine so yeah it will be even more expensive
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R.O.D
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
Jan 6, 2016 12:09 AM
qqqqball
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Oct 9, 2015 07:06 PM
R.O.D
Rtek Forum
1
Sep 23, 2015 01:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.