Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

my first manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #1  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
ON my first manifold

i've not done one of these before so let me know what you think.

downpipe to be done on sunday.










Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
that looks cool man, that's what emblem on there?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #3  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
it is a tag i had made up to put on everything i fab.

Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #4  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
Nice JOB
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Looks good man........Though I think the waste gate placement isn't ideal. It is Way to close to the intake manifold. Whatever cooling effects your intercooler is providing is null. But none the less it looks nice!

-J
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
500+hp club
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 4
From: .
money

how much for you to make a duplicate?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 02:46 AM
  #7  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
WOW!!, Gorgeous work and good design.

Just 1 MAJOR FLAW. You used a ON-CENTER turbine housig which is JUNK. It was designed as a space saver on specific old school desiel machinery and really doesn't save **** for space, but it does kill spool up and top end power signifacantly ( like near 15~20 % depending). If a standard tangical housing works, then well done my friend. If that manifold only fits with the bastard POS on-center, then sorry you put all that hard work into it (it'll still work though, but I question why the hard work and major attention to detail o the mani, but why pick such a cheap and POS turbo?). Really nice fab work though, probley the best I've seen in a long long while. The braces are very impressive as well.

~Mike..............
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 06:18 AM
  #8  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by silverfdturbo6port
how much for you to make a duplicate?
read below first:

Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
WOW!!, Gorgeous work and good design.

Just 1 MAJOR FLAW. You used a ON-CENTER turbine housig which is JUNK. It was designed as a space saver on specific old school desiel machinery and really doesn't save **** for space, but it does kill spool up and top end power signifacantly ( like near 15~20 % depending). If a standard tangical housing works, then well done my friend. If that manifold only fits with the bastard POS on-center, then sorry you put all that hard work into it (it'll still work though, but I question why the hard work and major attention to detail o the mani, but why pick such a cheap and POS turbo?). Really nice fab work though, probley the best I've seen in a long long while. The braces are very impressive as well.

~Mike..............
i agree with the turbo not being ideal. i tried to convince the customer to go with something newer, but they are set on rebuilding this old turbonetics turbo. the other downside to using an on-center turbine, is that the manifold is effectively useless for something that is off center (as mentioned by mike). i am going to try and make a jig using a gt35r before it goes away so i can make another. the attention to detail stems from the idea of not building anything i wouldn't want to put on my own car... also i provide a lifetime warranty on anything i make so i want to make sure i don't see it again.

this manifold is 100% stainless. i made it for $600. right now i only do fab work for local people though.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #9  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
Gorgeous work, beautiful welds, and a steal of a price.

~Mike.........
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
dean23's Avatar
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
beautiful. thats all i can say.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #11  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
dp done:



Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #12  
dean23's Avatar
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
can i get a picture of the manifold where the two pips meet? i would like to see how that is welded/joined.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #13  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by dean23
can i get a picture of the manifold where the two pips meet? i would like to see how that is welded/joined.
do you mean the collector?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #14  
justturbo2's Avatar
Registered User
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
From: new york
real nice
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #15  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
That is some beautiful fabrication! I see and appreciate that you have great pride in your work.

Besides being crippled by the customer's choice of on center undivided turbo, I do see one other thing I would request changed as a customer.

Like most manifold designs, you have your wastegate entry 90 deg to the runners. I have found when using a small turbo for good spool it is important to design the wastegate entry for good flow by diverging at an angle to avoid boost creep.

Most people say the boost creep is from too small a turbo, but if manifold design fixes the boost creep and the peak power goals are met, I say the problem is the wastegate merge limiting wastegate flow.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #16  
13brenova's Avatar
Learns the hard way.....
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 5
From: Ft Worth, Tx
Fab-u-lus! It looks like the runners are pretty close to equal length. Are they? From what I read when researching for my manifold, ideally the runners should extend 3" from the exhaust ports before bending. Your first turn out of the front rotor is so gradual that it's all academic. Looks great!
Sched 10 pipe? Did you acid wash or polish the pipe before welding to get it shined up?

Last edited by 13brenova; Sep 13, 2008 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #17  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
That is some beautiful fabrication! I see and appreciate that you have great pride in your work.

Besides being crippled by the customer's choice of on center undivided turbo, I do see one other thing I would request changed as a customer.

Like most manifold designs, you have your wastegate entry 90 deg to the runners. I have found when using a small turbo for good spool it is important to design the wastegate entry for good flow by diverging at an angle to avoid boost creep.

Most people say the boost creep is from too small a turbo, but if manifold design fixes the boost creep and the peak power goals are met, I say the problem is the wastegate merge limiting wastegate flow.
actually, to avoid boost creep you want the wastegate merge to be at a highest point of pressure in the manifold (such as in a bend or right before the turbine wheel). doing so will allow the quickest response time with the wastegate and be the most efficient at preventing spikes. a lot of wastegate priority manifolds have the wastegate merge at the final bend before the collector goes into the turbo. on a straight merge collector such as this the most ideal place is to have it as close to the turbo flange as possible. in most cases packaging is a limiting factor, hence the reason for it bending backward. the difference in wg response should be negligible.

Originally Posted by 13brenova
Fab-u-lus! It looks like the runners are pretty close to equal length. Are they? From what I read when researching for my manifold, ideally the runners should extend 3" from the exhaust ports before bending. Your first turn out of the front rotor is so gradual that it's all academic. Looks great!
Sched 10 pipe? Did you acid wash or polish the pipe before welding to get it shined up?
i knew about keeping the runners straight out of the ports, but to place the turbo properly it wasn't possible to keep the front runner straight or the turbo would run into the upper rad hose. the front runner is 15.4" long and the rear is 15.25" from flange to flange. everything is 304ss schedule 10. no acid wash, just a brass wire wheel on the bench grinder that is dedicated to ss only. that is the only prep i feel is needed.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #18  
Juiceh's Avatar
Saiga-12 Power!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,385
Likes: 2
From: N of Chicago
Looks pretty. But as stated before that wastegate looks awfully close to the LIM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #19  
LETHAL RX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: pa
What filler did you use on it? Looks like pretty nice work....if there are any flaws im sure you see or know what they are no need to critique(sp)
Greg
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #20  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
usually 309l or 316 filler. i'm always up for getting pointers or tips for improvement. the day i stop learning is the day i fail at life.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #21  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
I was not criticizing your wastegate placement at all, just pointing out the (typical) 90 deg diverge limits wastegate flow volume.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #22  
Rocking Rotary's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 3
From: St. Paul, MN
Great craftsman ship! I wish I could weld like that! Looks great
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #23  
LETHAL RX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: pa
what kind of ampg. do you weld at?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #24  
IAN's Avatar
IAN
Rotary Reborn!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 9
From: Canada
That has to be the best looking manifold built in ontario!!!

Sure kicks my HKS log............

Ian
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 07:43 AM
  #25  
weirRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
weiRtech
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
I was not criticizing your wastegate placement at all, just pointing out the (typical) 90 deg diverge limits wastegate flow volume.
i understand, i was just trying to share what i have learned about wg placement.

Originally Posted by LETHAL RX7
what kind of ampg. do you weld at?
the welder is usually set to 120 and i use the pedal to moderate it, so i couldn't really say exactly what amps it is at, i know it is close to full at pipe to flange joints and maybe a little more than half on pipe/pipe joints. 16g dp tubing is probably a third of the way down.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.