Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Mild single turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #1  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Mild single turbo?

Is there a single turbo for the FD that manages to retain some of the low end power that the stock twins have?

I love the stock twins but if they ever go out I might go with a simple single set up however I'm not looking to make a lot of horsepower over stock.

I was just wondering if there is some sort of smaller single that might be good for 300 whp and still quick to spool on the low end.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #2  
93rx74lyfe's Avatar
Ronald..
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 1
From: Fairfax/Manassas VA
If you want 300hp stick with the twins. Also you will have much more luck if you posted this in the single turbo section.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
r074r'/ |\|00B
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: KC, KS
I am probably wrong, but I would guess one of the faster spooling single turbo kits our there is the GT35R kit at rx7store.net.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
There's no need to go single if you're looking for 300RWHP. I made 330RWHP with stock twins, sequential, with little to no turbo lag. I also made 385RWHP on stock twins, non-sequential. No reason to go single if you're only looking for 300WHP.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #5  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Thanks for the input.
I've been putting off doing a vacuum job and I keep looking at the hose diagram thinking that there is no way it's doing to work when I'm finished. I started thinking why not a single. Until something breaks I will stick with my stock twins. They work extremely well.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
ok this is what you wanna do

just buy brand new 99spec twins in non sequential mode and get the wastgat ported

aem Water Methanol Injection system
aem boost controler
hks twin power

optional
supra fuel pump
aromotive frp
850cc primery injectors
downpipe mid pipe no cats heat wrapped - will take alot of heat out of the engin bay...

no more milion vacum lines
this will make thing simple and more reliable

also it will be the most affordable option trust me...

and you will make more then 300 rwhp

you cant beat the fiting of OEM parts any single turbo kit you get will have some lag
low cost turbo kits are junk i learned it the hard way...
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #7  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
There’s an old saying - The sequential twin turbo setup is amazing…when it works.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #8  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
non sequential suck *** as far as spool is concerned. If you are gonna go nonseq might as well go single.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
^ I couldn't agree more. :tup: My single turbo lags less than my non-sequential twins did...
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,281
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
NOTHING will spool like sequential twins, particularly '99 flavor.

So, at that peak power level expectation, stick with them. If however, you're also looking to simplify the system and save weight/heat as well, try the Apexi RX6 kit, a small 35R, or a small T04.

Last edited by ptrhahn; Jul 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #11  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
eventually there will be problems with sequential setup...we all know that they are amaizing when working but it's not worth the headache.....

on my car i run single gt35r...

i am only saying
non-sequential for one reson its more reliable vs sequential

also bouth turbos come on at the same time no boost creep at transition
+ gets rid of all them solenoids and vacuum lines
moust people can do all the work and just take it out for tune

save you alot of money and 8h of down time max

as far as single turbo kits gos they are overpriced...rx7 store single turbo kit is junk you see alot of them for sale after 2000 - 5000 miles in for sale section....mostly do to bad manifolds that burn out gaskets... difected downpipes....

i know becouse thats where i got my gt35r kit
after paying for the full kit i instaled it and had it tuned... i had to pul turbo out 3 times for turbo gasket changis... finaly got sick of doing that and got another manifold...
another 400$...i had to mod the down pipe when i first got it didnt work so well ...so i had to chang the flangis...

and lets not talk about rerouting wastgat and welding in bov, larger intercooler instalation,fuel setup,wheels and tire...

there is no point going single for 300hp...

alot of work and frostration and lost driving time...

most of you whent non-sequential on old bit up twins...i wouldnt expect them to work that well...

just open up the exaust no cats and them things will spool right up... you will like it
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #12  
fd3s7007's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Malaysia
Originally Posted by serbRX7
eventually there will be problems with sequential setup...we all know that they are amaizing when working but it's not worth the headache.....

on my car i run single gt35r...

i am only saying
non-sequential for one reson its more reliable vs sequential

also bouth turbos come on at the same time no boost creep at transition
+ gets rid of all them solenoids and vacuum lines
moust people can do all the work and just take it out for tune

save you alot of money and 8h of down time max

as far as single turbo kits gos they are overpriced...rx7 store single turbo kit is junk you see alot of them for sale after 2000 - 5000 miles in for sale section....mostly do to bad manifolds that burn out gaskets... difected downpipes....

i know becouse thats where i got my gt35r kit
after paying for the full kit i instaled it and had it tuned... i had to pul turbo out 3 times for turbo gasket changis... finaly got sick of doing that and got another manifold...
another 400$...i had to mod the down pipe when i first got it didnt work so well ...so i had to chang the flangis...

and lets not talk about rerouting wastgat and welding in bov, larger intercooler instalation,fuel setup,wheels and tire...

there is no point going single for 300hp...

alot of work and frostration and lost driving time...

most of you whent non-sequential on old bit up twins...i wouldnt expect them to work that well...

just open up the exaust no cats and them things will spool right up... you will like it

DUde,

I respect where you're coming from. Believe me. I have 2 fd's. 1 running a single gt35/40 setup at 462rwhp@1bar and a stock standard series 8 2001 twin turbo. Nothing like the twins setup properly to really give you a run for your money. The singles are great but on track twins catch up pretty fast!! The question really is - What are you after.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #13  
KFC3S's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 1
From: Sydney, AU
What about a S5 turbo and manifold + a power FC and tune?
Its not an ideal turbo, but you would get factory fitment, quick response and simplicity.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #14  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by montego
non sequential suck *** as far as spool is concerned.
These types of mindless comments always originate with hacks who don't know what they're talking about and/or didn't do the job right. A properly set-up non-sequential system with a fully ported manifold, lightweight flywheel, full exhaust, etc spools just fine: full boost at 3400 rpm and good torque....this has been proven on numerous occasions

The funny thing is most high rpm single turbo dyno queens aren't much quicker in the 1/4, and they damn sure aren't any faster on a roadcourse or mountain road
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
These types of mindless comments always originate with hacks who don't know what they're talking about and/or didn't do the job right. A properly set-up non-sequential system with a fully ported manifold, lightweight flywheel, full exhaust, etc spools just fine: full boost at 3400 rpm and good torque....this has been proven on numerous occasions

The funny thing is most high rpm single turbo dyno queens aren't much quicker in the 1/4, and they damn sure aren't any faster on a roadcourse or mountain road
WHO IS YOUR DADDY AND WHAT DOES HE DO?

To the OP there are several dyno graphs out there with all kinds of setups. What you want to be looking at is the power that different setups develop at what RPM it will tell you how the cars running them perform.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #16  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Sorry, I don't speak Canadian, nor do I attempt to understand wacky left-wingers - I'm an engineer
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #17  
BlowenByTwins's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Is your engine ported at all, or do you have stock porting?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 09:14 PM
  #18  
Zokus's Avatar
"Mellow Yellow"
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
I love my GT3076R. The spool is not much different than the twins (5 psi @ 2500, 10 @ 3000, 15 @ 35-3800), easily does 380whp, and is so much simpler.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 09:24 PM
  #19  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
60-1
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #20  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
Originally Posted by fd3s7007
DUde,

I respect where you're coming from. Believe me. I have 2 fd's. 1 running a single gt35/40 setup at 462rwhp@1bar and a stock standard series 8 2001 twin turbo. Nothing like the twins setup properly to really give you a run for your money. The singles are great but on track twins catch up pretty fast!! The question really is - What are you after.
462rwhp@1bar nice that about 14.5 psi low boost must have large ports what fuel are you running...
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:05 PM
  #21  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
These types of mindless comments always originate with hacks who don't know what they're talking about and/or didn't do the job right. A properly set-up non-sequential system with a fully ported manifold, lightweight flywheel, full exhaust, etc spools just fine: full boost at 3400 rpm and good torque....this has been proven on numerous occasions

The funny thing is most high rpm single turbo dyno queens aren't much quicker in the 1/4, and they damn sure aren't any faster on a roadcourse or mountain road
thats right
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #22  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
Originally Posted by Zokus
I love my GT3076R. The spool is not much different than the twins (5 psi @ 2500, 10 @ 3000, 15 @ 35-3800), easily does 380whp, and is so much simpler.
Sounds interesting. Which manifold are you using? Mind sharing a dyno graph?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #23  
Radial GT's Avatar
*BOV sound*
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 2
From: Northern Minnesota
I have the NS twins, and as far as low end power goes you give up a little bit down low, say under 3000. But lets be realistic, if your idling your RX7 and lugging it on a uphill expecting low end power, you might as well be driving a Camry. This is a sports car, you are going to have to switch gears on uphills, and when you do you will be speeding...

Getting to the point. Yes compaired to the stock twins the NS setup is slower in creating boost, but it gives it back to you in pure redline fun. The simplicity of the vacume setup alone makes the conversion an easy sell IMO. And knowing that if I hatch my twins, I can find another set to duplicate my setup for a pretty inexpensive price is the ultimate.

Good Luck, have fun.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #24  
r074r'/ |\|00B
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: KC, KS
I'm pretty sure I will switch to NS, but for now will continue to enjoy my working sequential setup.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #25  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Radial GT
I have the NS twins, and as far as low end power goes you give up a little bit down low, say under 3000. But lets be realistic, if your idling your RX7 and lugging it on a uphill expecting low end power, you might as well be driving a Camry. This is a sports car...
Somebody gets it. Those who talk about "low end torque" with respect to a 13b make me laugh. Buy a vette, you've got the wrong car. All you're ever going to get with these engines is a mid range (street friendly) or a top end oriented powerband with a big single turbo and/or aggressive porting. A smooth, controllable powerband from 3500 rpm up is ideal for the street or roadcourse - no spikes, no secondary turbo transition, limited hook-up problems. Non-sequential or medium sized turbos deliver that kind of power. If you need more, do a 20b conversion, but be prepared to upgrade everything behind the engine.

Yes compaired to the stock twins the NS setup is slower in creating boost, but it gives it back to you in pure redline fun.
It's honestly not much different with a ported manifold and lightweight flywheel, and pulls better on top.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.