Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Mild single turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 05:04 PM
  #76  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Fast enough for Charlotte. I honestly haven't lost yet. I'm sure it will happen, but not so far....everything is relative
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #77  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
^ I hear you there, and I agree that everything is relative. But I think Montego was referring to your setup with respect to the rest of the RX7 community, in which case no, you are not that fast.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #78  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
Mark here I'll explain it in a different way because for some reason you seem to take this whole non-sequential personally.

Yes in my experience the nonseq "sucks ***" in comparison to sequential. But that does NOT mean that non seq is SLOW nor that it sucks OVERALL. It is ONLY a comparison between those two setups. That's it man, there is no reason to prove that you have never been beaten because frankly, that is not relevant.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #79  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by TRWeiss
I hear you there, and I agree that everything is relative. But I think Montego was referring to your setup with respect to the rest of the RX7 community, in which case no, you are not that fast.
Never said otherwise. Somehow we went from tired seq-non-seq comparisons to who has the faster car. I couldn't care less. Drive the car and enjoy it. A single turbo is in my future at some point, but honestly I'm not sure I could use the extra power anyway.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 05:24 PM
  #80  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
I went back a page to see and it's my mistake. Montego was replying to another member, not you when he said "just part of the pack." I interpreted your "the pack is all behind me" comment as being directed toward other members on this board, not toward vehicles in NC, since that's what Montego was referring to - RX7s...That's the only reason I called you out on it.

My mistake.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 11:18 PM
  #81  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
Originally Posted by TRWeiss1
He asked for a video, so why not give him one? Truthfully, I'd like to see a non-laggy non-sequential setup.

Speaking from personal experience of going from sequential to non-sequential to single turbo, non-sequential is undeniably more laggy than sequential. There's just no way around it. The factory twin turbo setup was DESIGNED to minimize lag, so when you go non-sequential and have 1 rotor spooling 1 turbo and the 2nd rotor spooling the 2nd turbo, it's GOING to lag. I have a moderate street port and the lag was certainly noticeable when I was non-sequential. However, I did learn to downshift/live with it/etc...Regardless though, the lag WAS there...FWIW I was running the stock twins @ 15 psi making 370RWHP.

As long as you size your single turbo properly, and go with the proper porting, you're not going to lag anymore than a non-sequential setup. I know I get full boost in my 500R by 4k rpms. Again, just speaking from personal experience, a single turbo is not going to lag anymore than the twins do (non-sequential) unless you go with some ridiculous a/r / size the turbo totally wrong.

Just MHO.
right you mad a more reliable car and more power...

i originaly recomended that for others that are thinking of going single turbo but only want 50-100hp more... to save them some trouble and money

thing is no one claims that non sequential setup is not lagy people just need to learn how to drive with it....
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 12:51 AM
  #82  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
I don't think it's laggy. Again, this engine will never be a low end monster and 5th gear is useless. Let it rip. Rotaries and made to rev. Non-sequential delivers a very broad powerband from 3400 up. Anything more than about 400 hp isn't going to add much to my driving experience because I'm just going to be struggling for traction. It's been proven that these cars only need about 350-400 to tear up a roadcourse.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #83  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by serbRX7
right you mad a more reliable car and more power
Is this engine more reliable at 23 psi? I highly doubt it. Sure, water injection helps, but all it takes is one little thing to go wrong at that boost level and you're done. I've detonated at 16-17 psi and the motor lived another day. 500 hp is pushing this engine extremely hard, past the point of true reliability imo, and also based on the general track record I've seen on this forum. I've seen these high hp dyno queens come and go on this forum for years, the owners usually crash or end up selling. Yes, Howard does it, but he has a ton of equipment on his car and alot more experience (plus if the engine pops, it's not a big deal for him). There is ALWAYS someone faster, that cycle never ends. I just enjoy driving.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:16 AM
  #84  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Anything more than about 400 hp isn't going to add much to my driving experience because I'm just going to be struggling for traction.
I've got over 500RWHP and I generally don't have traction issues (although sometimes it's inevitable). :P You just need some sticky tires to put the power to the pavement. That and you can't be driving around in weather conditions which aren't optimal for these cars, of course. I'm running Nitto NT 555Rs (285/35zr18s) and I couldn't be happier with them, quite honestly.

As far as reliability goes, you say "is the motor anymore reliable @ 23 psi?" Obviously it's not more reliable, but as you stated I've got a dual nozzle water/meth setup by coolingmist with a variable pressure pump for added insurance. You are correct that if that fails the motor *could* be in trouble, but we did try to take this into consideration. Dave @ KDR is a very conservative tuner, so we went with as safe of a tune as possible. Sure I could've made more power, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.

What really sucks is that @ 23 psi my turbo is JUST starting to get into its efficiency range, but I'm running out of fuel due to my stock fuel lines. Either way, my AFRs are safe, and I just wanted to make over 500RWHP so I'm happy! Not to mention, with minimal lag the car still has a very useable powerband! I make 350RWTQ @ 4200 rpms.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:59 AM
  #85  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
Edit :: Just looked at my dyno sheet again...350RWTQ @ 4500 rpms.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #86  
serbRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Likes: 1
From: ny
This is geting to be pointless... Driving a NS setup car is like driving a single turbo car ...you got to be in the right gear and they will spool up fast...lag is minimal... And this is a god way to go if you have over boosting problems and wanna make things simple and I wouldn't go more then 15psi on NS setup

Ok when I was talking about high boost I was talking about my car...and that's what I am going to do...got it now...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #87  
hades's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Tx
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
I don't think it's laggy. Again, this engine will never be a low end monster and 5th gear is useless. Let it rip. Rotaries and made to rev. Non-sequential delivers a very broad powerband from 3400 up. Anything more than about 400 hp isn't going to add much to my driving experience because I'm just going to be struggling for traction. It's been proven that these cars only need about 350-400 to tear up a roadcourse.
what do you mean 5th gear is useless? useless racing or useless cruising on the freeway at 70-80 and trying to accelerate a bit to pass someone without down shifting?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #88  
mikeric's Avatar
FB=OS Giken LSD
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Originally Posted by TRWeiss1
Edit :: Just looked at my dyno sheet again...350RWTQ @ 4500 rpms.
Wow, how do you confuse 350 and 500 whp? That is a jump.

I have to say that Dave does my tuning too and I'm currently sitting at tight around 350 with his conservative tune. It is really fun in an FB--makes for great looks on Mustang owners faces when you pass them!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 08:14 PM
  #89  
94touringFD's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
He did not confuse 350 with 500, he confused at what rpm he reaches 350rwtq. He makes over 500whp, his reason for posting that was to give an idea of how responsive his set up is.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #90  
TRWeiss1's Avatar
LSx 7.0L
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 2
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by 94touringFD
He did not confuse 350 with 500, he confused at what rpm he reaches 350rwtq. He makes over 500whp, his reason for posting that was to give an idea of how responsive his set up is.
Thank you. I'm glad someone understood me.

lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Jan 11, 2016 04:08 PM
stickmantijuana
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 21, 2015 08:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.