Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Master power turbos, who has used them?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2007 | 11:50 PM
  #1  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Master power turbos, who has used them?

this is more for personal knowledge so i can weigh out and figure out an issue i ran into tonight. the question is how many people have run these turbos with or without issue and what numbers they put down, time in use and cause of death.

during tuning tonight on a customer's car with a MP T70 w/.69a/r hotside equipped the turbo gave up at only 13PSI while finishing up the tune. the thrust and turbine bearings were destroyed and the turbo only had 2k miles on it. i didn't bother to check the restrictor while reassembling the engine but it had 2k miles on it prior to reassembly so i had no reason to question it but it had never been pushed before and obviously it could have been restricted of lubrication.

the main question i'm asking though is how many have run them successfully and how many have had similar issues with these turbos? i have a brand new one sitting in my shop so it's kind of a personal question as well before i bother with the install on my own car.


edit: and no these are not to be confused with the Chinese made XS power turbos, i have heard good things about Master Power turbos but i am starting to have my doubts after dealing with this issue.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 01:09 AM
  #2  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
.69 or .96? .69 is pretty small if this is on an rx7 is it not? if so, that must have been one hot exhaust housing
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 05:09 AM
  #3  
signofinfinity's Avatar
Coyote
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Malta. Europe
that's an overheated CHRA in my opinion. .69 is wwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy smothering especially on a ported engine...

seen same happen on the to4e with similar a/r.... the melt internally
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
Mytelex22's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Originally Posted by CrackHeadMel
.69 or .96? .69 is pretty small if this is on an rx7 is it not? if so, that must have been one hot exhaust housing
its a .69, I know 'cause it's my turbo
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
Slammedblk7's Avatar
Yes its slow
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,455
Likes: 0
From: usa
I've been using MP Turbos since Jan 04'. I've never had any problems with mine. Also, what restrictor do you speak of? I've never used any type of oil restrictions on mine. I ran 1 bar on the street for like 2 years.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #6  
NoPis10's Avatar
Committee Member #2
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 5
From: Committe Chambers
There is a Toyota Supra that a local shop built using a MasterPower turbo on it that makes a little over 600 HP at the wheels. He has been using the turbo for over 2 years and he runs high 10's in the 1/4. No issues as of yet. Also, a local RX7 ( Time Machines ) on the SE forum runs a MP as well and has run high 9's in the 1/4.

L8R
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #7  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
.69 good lord what where you guys trying to accomplish? How high your egt's could get? How much back pressure yall could muster? or how fast the turbo could blow? j/k but seriously get a bigger hotside. also may have something to do with the restrictor. I have one in mine but my take it out now.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
Slammedblk7's Avatar
Yes its slow
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,455
Likes: 0
From: usa
Yeah, I would get a P-trim .96 housing on that turbo next time, Also take off that restrictor.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #9  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
running a new turbo with same specs now with no restrictor, guess we will see how it turns out in a few days. the EGTs were only about 1450*F, boost creep is only up to about 13PSI of boost so it isn't being pushed all too hard.

after pulling the turbo off it did have a very small restrictor in the oil feed line, about as small as i would ever attempt putting on a turbo, from the setup the previous builder had put together.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by Karack
running a new turbo with same specs now with no restrictor, guess we will see how it turns out in a few days. the EGTs were only about 1450*F, boost creep is only up to about 13PSI of boost so it isn't being pushed all too hard.

after pulling the turbo off it did have a very small restrictor in the oil feed line, about as small as i would ever attempt putting on a turbo, from the setup the previous builder had put together.
Where's the probe located to read 1450*F?

B
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #11  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
3-4" post turbine, yes i know it will not pick up what the turbine is seeing but the turbo was digging its grave once i hit 7-8 PSI and that was giving plenty of time to cool down between runs.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
well thats not that bad. my t04s sees that at 5lbs
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:47 AM
  #13  
ZAN_TUNING's Avatar
Just turn up the boost!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: HELL
never had any issues with the master power series love them!!! i place blame on the restrictor... i've only used such things on ball bearing setups.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #14  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Hope you get it worked out Karack.

B
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #15  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
I tried a MP T70 on a different setup then a Rotary and had nothing but problems. Turbo leaked from the exhaust side after only a week of use. I sold it and went back to the tried and true stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #16  
rx705's Avatar
7Azn
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
im currently running a master power t-70 .96 but its still underconstruction .....

will be tuned by chuck westbrook and hopefully be running to tell the good or bad news about them .....
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Master Power T70 w/ a 0.96 A/R will work! I'm about to ditch the 1.32 A/R I have and downsize to a 0.96 A/R. I love the turbo; works very well.

B
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #18  
Mytelex22's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 1
From: Miami
just an update as to the OP.

The turbine is running great! It see's full boost(13 PBS) @ 3200 rpm, and the eggs stay strong at about 1500-1600 @ WOT... The final assesment to the original failure was the restrictor... Thaks to all who gave input
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #19  
RotaryBred's Avatar
Lost You in the Rear View
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Hill, CT
i just purchased a MP T70 with a manifold and wastegate for $500.. 1.00 A/R... how much whp can i expect on a large street port with all supporting mods?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #20  
FC3S.USD's Avatar
Where is my Life ?
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: ottawa canada
if you read around the forum.

at about

18-19 psi 440-470

15 psi 400-430
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #21  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Originally Posted by Karack
this is more for personal knowledge so i can weigh out and figure out an issue i ran into tonight. the question is how many people have run these turbos with or without issue and what numbers they put down, time in use and cause of death.

during tuning tonight on a customer's car with a MP T70 w/.69a/r hotside equipped the turbo gave up at only 13PSI while finishing up the tune. the thrust and turbine bearings were destroyed and the turbo only had 2k miles on it. i didn't bother to check the restrictor while reassembling the engine but it had 2k miles on it prior to reassembly so i had no reason to question it but it had never been pushed before and obviously it could have been restricted of lubrication.

the main question i'm asking though is how many have run them successfully and how many have had similar issues with these turbos? i have a brand new one sitting in my shop so it's kind of a personal question as well before i bother with the install on my own car.


edit: and no these are not to be confused with the Chinese made XS power turbos, i have heard good things about Master Power turbos but i am starting to have my doubts after dealing with this issue.
Hi Karack, sorry I didn’t see this thread earlier, I haven’t logged on to rx7 forum for a while.

I am Australasian distributor for Masterpower.

The problem will be the restrictor, you shouldn’t be using restrictors on journal bearing turbos, we recommend -4 or ¼” lines unrestricted.
Journal bearing turbos are designed to operate at same oil pressure as engine. i.e. 50-80psi, I have some rotary tune shop customers that actually use -6 lines.

Sometimes I have disgruntled Garrett customers that have experienced same issue as you by running restrictors on there journal bearing turbos.

The .69 shouldn’t be a problem we are running the MP GT37 with .7 divided housings now on some 13b’s with turbines smaller than p trim, for application over 400whp were max response is crucial. ie drifting application
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #22  
nitroracer's Avatar
Dub'N
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: san diego
you recommend -4, but is -3 safe for these turbos?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #23  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
-4 is recommended minimum, so you should be using larger not smaller,
What’s worse is that the -4 fittings are restricted down from 6mm to only 3mm making them already less than recommended standard for medium size journal bearing turbos.

A standard Hitachi turbo is basically a t04 journal bearing core, it uses unrestricted -4 or 6mm ID lines…. with a larger turbo fitted that experiences more bearing load it seem illogical to install with lines that are smaller than stock.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 12:47 AM
  #24  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
I'm glad this thread came up because I have a restrictor in mine right now but I've never fired it up so thats a damn good thing. I guess the only question I have then is with my old bnr stage IV I had to have a restrictor or I would get oil leaking out of the turbine itself. So after I saw this happen I just assumed any journal bearing tubo would need a restrictor.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 05:10 AM
  #25  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Perhaps in the bnr situation the turbo was to far gone that not even a rebuild with new seals could fix.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.