Greddy T78 = what? in Garrett terms
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
Greddy T78 = what? in Garrett terms
I've got a Greddy T78-33d, but its pretty old and I'm looking at upgrades.
Here are the specs on the T78:
Compressor wheel
In dia : 65.8 mm
Out dia : 90.0 mm
Turbine wheel
Out dia : 65.0 mm
Ex dia : 74.0mm
So if I were looking for a Garrett GT dual ball bearing turbo, would this be similar in size?
A Guide To Garrett’s "GT" Model Numbers
GTxxyyzz:
"xx" refers to the frame size of the turbine wheel inducer
"yy" designate the compressor wheel exducer (major) diameter in millimeters
"zz" may be used to designate special features of a particular turbocharger where applicable
So... the Greddy T78 would be close to the following Garrett model:
GT3788
GT37 looks like it means 72.5mm for the exhaust turbine, which is a tad smaller than the T78 (74mm). Then next size up is a GT40, which is 78mm. So the closest on the exhaust side of things is the GT37
The GT37's closest compressor wheel is 88mm (just a tad smaller than the T78)
The GT3788 also comes in an A/R of 1.11 (I'm not sure what the T78 is, but I think it is a 1.1)
Everyone usually refers to the Greddy T78 being a 66-67mm turbo, which must be due to the compressor inducer size at 65.8mm. The GT3788 is only 63.5mm. So the GT3788 looks to be a bit smaller in general, but if I get the dual ball bearing, and if they come out with the GTX version eventually, will the GT3788 perform better in responsiveness (spool time) as well as top end power (despite is size disadvantage)?
My next question is the exhaust inlet, how can i tell if the flange is the same?
Thanks.
Here are the specs on the T78:
Compressor wheel
In dia : 65.8 mm
Out dia : 90.0 mm
Turbine wheel
Out dia : 65.0 mm
Ex dia : 74.0mm
So if I were looking for a Garrett GT dual ball bearing turbo, would this be similar in size?
A Guide To Garrett’s "GT" Model Numbers
GTxxyyzz:
"xx" refers to the frame size of the turbine wheel inducer
"yy" designate the compressor wheel exducer (major) diameter in millimeters
"zz" may be used to designate special features of a particular turbocharger where applicable
So... the Greddy T78 would be close to the following Garrett model:
GT3788
GT37 looks like it means 72.5mm for the exhaust turbine, which is a tad smaller than the T78 (74mm). Then next size up is a GT40, which is 78mm. So the closest on the exhaust side of things is the GT37
The GT37's closest compressor wheel is 88mm (just a tad smaller than the T78)
The GT3788 also comes in an A/R of 1.11 (I'm not sure what the T78 is, but I think it is a 1.1)
Everyone usually refers to the Greddy T78 being a 66-67mm turbo, which must be due to the compressor inducer size at 65.8mm. The GT3788 is only 63.5mm. So the GT3788 looks to be a bit smaller in general, but if I get the dual ball bearing, and if they come out with the GTX version eventually, will the GT3788 perform better in responsiveness (spool time) as well as top end power (despite is size disadvantage)?
My next question is the exhaust inlet, how can i tell if the flange is the same?
Thanks.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
Or since I can get the GT4088R in dual ball bearing, which has a 4mm larger exhaust turbine, does the ball bearing and newer design make up for the potentially less responsive larger exhaust turbine?
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
compressor average area in sq inches
Garretts nearby:
TO4z/A-Spec GT500r/PT67.......7.002
GT3788r.................................. 7.155
GT4088r.................................. 7.167
GT4088.....................................7.26
T66...........................................7.56 7
T78...........................................7.58 4
GT4094r....................................8.175
Garretts nearby:
TO4z/A-Spec GT500r/PT67.......7.002
GT3788r.................................. 7.155
GT4088r.................................. 7.167
GT4088.....................................7.26
T66...........................................7.56 7
T78...........................................7.58 4
GT4094r....................................8.175
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
turbine aver sq area and % of compressor:
GT3788r........5.694 79%
TO4z etc.......5.894 84%
GT4088r........6.423 89%
GT4088..........6.633 91%
T78................5.903 78%
T66................5.894 77%
GT4094r.........6.423 79%
GT3788r........5.694 79%
TO4z etc.......5.894 84%
GT4088r........6.423 89%
GT4088..........6.633 91%
T78................5.903 78%
T66................5.894 77%
GT4094r.........6.423 79%
Trending Topics
Hi Howard,
Is yr email address still; howracing@gmail.com ? I sent an email yesterday to you. Did you receive it ? I need to ask you about my engine conversion project. Awaiting for yr reply. Thanks.
Is yr email address still; howracing@gmail.com ? I sent an email yesterday to you. Did you receive it ? I need to ask you about my engine conversion project. Awaiting for yr reply. Thanks.
compressor average area in sq inches
Garretts nearby:
TO4z/A-Spec GT500r/PT67.......7.002
GT3788r.................................. 7.155
GT4088r.................................. 7.167
GT4088.....................................7.26
T66...........................................7.56 7
T78...........................................7.58 4
GT4094r....................................8.175
Garretts nearby:
TO4z/A-Spec GT500r/PT67.......7.002
GT3788r.................................. 7.155
GT4088r.................................. 7.167
GT4088.....................................7.26
T66...........................................7.56 7
T78...........................................7.58 4
GT4094r....................................8.175
If I understand, this is going to be used on your twincharged project?
If so, then you shouldn't just pick similar sized turbocharger as your old unit, but something what will work with high efficiency at your desired power levels.
Supercharger will make engine appear "bigger" and turbo will work at lower pressure ratio for given manifold absolute pressure and desired mass flow. Bottom line is, that compressor should support high airflow at low PR with high eff. and turbine can be sized on the large side for even lower backpressure without compromising responsiveness of whole setup.
If so, then you shouldn't just pick similar sized turbocharger as your old unit, but something what will work with high efficiency at your desired power levels.
Supercharger will make engine appear "bigger" and turbo will work at lower pressure ratio for given manifold absolute pressure and desired mass flow. Bottom line is, that compressor should support high airflow at low PR with high eff. and turbine can be sized on the large side for even lower backpressure without compromising responsiveness of whole setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM








