Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Ball Bearing Turbos Yes or No?

Old Aug 23, 2002 | 12:03 AM
  #1  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,030
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Ball Bearing Turbos Yes or No?

I wanted some feedback from you single guys on Ball Bearing Turbos.
I'm not talking about the single bearing Turbonetics crap either.
While I know that the turbo's are supposed to be somewhat more reliable and spool a few hundred RPM's sooner.

I wanted to get get some user feedback and expert advice.

Any of you BB guys had any problems?
Is it worth the extra cost?
What are you going to do when it come to rebuilding time???
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
you know what Id say...its totally worth it.

for me...tis all about the response because of where i drive the car...Im in the LA area...traffic traffic traffic

j
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 01:39 AM
  #3  
suprfast's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: home
geez, i never really thought turbonetics was crap. well thats what i get for reading and not actually testing them. id like some info on the BB's too.
kris
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 04:08 AM
  #4  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
To my understanding, BB turbos spool faster, are stronger, can boost a lot more and more durable towards compression surge compared to non-BB turbos. However I hear that they are very prone to heat and also are very costly to rebuild. Furthermore, a lot of single turbos noadays that are non-BB spool just as quickly as some BB turbos do. I have the apex'i rx6 kit. So far, I am very happy with the response and power delivery. I also hear that IHI BB turbos are very nice compared to other BB turbos(the RX6 BB is the same turbo used on honda indy cars and they boost upwards of up to 40psi!)
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
Brad's Avatar
dear baby jesus...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: WA
Originally posted by 1FooknTiteFD
(the RX6 BB is the same turbo used on honda indy cars and they boost upwards of up to 40psi!)
Yeah, for one race...then they throw it in the trash can and put a brand new one on for the next race
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
ThirdGenRX7's Avatar
Waiting
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Originally posted by GotBoostd7


Yeah, for one race...then they throw it in the trash can and put a brand new one on for the next race
bah... minor details
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #7  
87GTR's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 1
From: Nago Okinawa
I vote yeah!! im going for twin GT28's
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 01:27 PM
  #8  
glemmers's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL
A few points that everyone needs to know about turbos and bearings.

1. Everytime a turbo spools, it passes through critical speed (natural frequency). Now, I have never seen a ball bearing turbo disassembled, but unless the have squeeze film bearings (high pressure oil behind the outer bearing race), which I doubt, there is no dampening to minimize the destructive forces created by the turbines passing through critical speed. The forces on the bearings at critical speed are generally 10 - 100 times higher than typical loads. These loads can very quickly destroy a bearing and turbine wheel. A journal bearing on the other hand has a natural dampening effect, and greatly reduces bearing and turbine stress at critical sped. In fact, most aerospace corporations (where extremely high MTBF's are typical), if operating super critical, or above the critical speed, journal bearings or spueeze film bearings are an absolute must.

2. Rolling element bearing have a finite life. This means that they will fail. For a propoerly desinged bearing, this could be tens of thousands of hours of operation, but they do have a finite life. Journal bearings on the other hand, have an infinite life. This is because there is no metal to metal contact once the bearing is spinning. If the oil is kept clean, journal bearings will last virtually forever.

3. Most often on high speed application, such as turbos, journal bearings are more efficeint than rolling element bearings. This means they will spool faster. Just because a journal bearing turbo doesn't spin when you blow air with your mouth at it doesn't mean it will spool slower than a ball bearing. Once a journal bearing is pressurized with oil and is spinning in the hydrodynamic region, there is very little drag. Oil sprayed at rolling element bearings, required to cool and lubricate, in fact can cause excessive power consumption and drag if not properly controlled.

4. Journal bearings can carry significantly higher loads than rolling element bearings for any given equivalent volume. Plus, the faster the shaft is spinning, the more load they can carry. Rolling elemnet bearings do not have this advantage, and in fact, the faster they spin, the higher the forces on the outer race created by the rolling elements. This forces increases proportional to speed squared The only way to reduce this is to run lighter weight elements, ala ceramic. Ceramic ***** have pros and cons which I won;t go into. The biggest con though is excessive cost. Thus the expense to rebuild these turbos.

With all the talk of ball bearing turbos these days, I thought people should be aware of the above issues. Use it as you may.

Glenn
'93 CYM
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 01:54 PM
  #9  
wptrx7's Avatar
Newb Photog
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
now i'm more confused than ever. choosing a single turbo is so much harder than i thought.

luigi
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #10  
93redFD's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
how much sooner does a bb spool up????? I heared that it was ony about 500-600 rpm sooner.. If thats true then I would rather not have one for the cost.. i think the only way somebody knows how much sooner it spools up is have the same turbo but swich to bb option, not swich from a t51r to gt35/40!!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 06:46 PM
  #11  
Greg's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: The First State
Originally posted by 87GTR
I vote yeah!! im going for twin GT28's
need a manifold?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 06:52 PM
  #12  
Greg's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: The First State
Originally posted by 93redFD
how much sooner does a bb spool up????? I heared that it was ony about 500-600 rpm sooner.. If thats true then I would rather not have one for the cost.. i think the only way somebody knows how much sooner it spools up is have the same turbo but swich to bb option, not swich from a t51r to gt35/40!!

Match a good build DBB Turbo with a Fully divided and well designed manifold and you will be ing
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tallbozo
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Aug 15, 2015 02:47 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM
WyomingTII
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Aug 13, 2015 10:42 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.