Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Ball-Bearing turbos, worth the extra cost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-04, 03:37 PM
  #1  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ball-Bearing turbos, worth the extra cost?

Im thinking of selling my Greddy kit and going with a garret turbo. Would something like the ball-bearing GT40R be worth all the extra cost over something like say, a T04E? The turbo itself is almost twice as expensive, and the only benifit I know of is the slightly quicker spool time. Its not that Im cheap, I just dont want to waste my money for something not really worth the cost. In case it matters, I want ~400 RWHP (FC), and mods in sig.
Old 09-26-04, 04:51 PM
  #2  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Thats a huge question, Ive had a GT35R and I liked it. What always worried me was the replacement cost/repair costs.
Sean at A-spec said the cost has come way down on repairing them but from what I have seen there is a guy here on the forum having trouible getting a compressor wheel for his 40R. I blow motors on occasion and it hurts enough to buy new motors let alone having to spend out the butt for turbo's also. I went with a real cheap turbo to replace yet still make big power with decent spool. Although the performance of the Ball bearing do have a slight advantage in some respects.
Ive owned both. I think there is alot of Hype on any new product. Rotor motors blow more frequently and take thier toll on turbos. I push the motor too much to replace expensive turbos as often as motors.
Old 09-26-04, 05:02 PM
  #3  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for the response. So you went from a BB GT35R, to a similarly sized non-BB turbo. Could you tell any noticable difference in turbo response?
Old 09-26-04, 05:29 PM
  #4  
Rebreaking things

 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
Ive owned both. ...
He has, but he hasn't driven both so at this point he's speculating

I have driven Zoomzoom's car with the BB GT35R and I have a non ball bearing GT35 on my car with a slightly smaller AR, but a T4, rather than a T3 footprint. I didn't feel a difference in spool up between the two. However, neither of our cars were properly tuned and I didn't drive them back to back.
Old 09-26-04, 10:59 PM
  #5  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for the input, I dont think Im going to worry about it then, non-BB should be fine. While on the subject, here are the specs of the turbo I am looking at, could I get some feedback please?

T04 E , .70 A/R compressor , 1.00 A/R hotside, divided.
Compressor inducer diameter 2", exducer 2.95"
Old 09-27-04, 12:55 AM
  #6  
Rebreaking things

 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you have the trim or inducer/exducer size for the compressor wheel?
Old 09-27-04, 04:18 AM
  #7  
Microtech Tuning!

 
Infini IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 626 Socal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That inducer is a little on the small side. I very much doubt it will get you to ~400rwhp. You could, however, get a larger compressor wheel (T04E 57 or 60-trim, 60-1, etc.) and have the compressor housing machined to fit.
Old 09-27-04, 07:02 AM
  #8  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wheel is a P-trim. If this is too small, Im open to suggestions.
Old 09-27-04, 09:19 AM
  #9  
NorCal 7's Co-founder

 
BoostedRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Just step up to a T04S. Or if you can find one a 62-1. That will get you to where you need to be all day long and they'll both still spool just fine as long as you stay with the 1.00A/R. Just my .02 though.

Zach
Old 09-27-04, 09:39 AM
  #10  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
SlingShotRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: DC
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my Tunner..
Ballbearing Turbos aren't worth the extra cost.
From what I understand, BB turbos are more prone
to failure and alot more expensive to rebuild.
Old 09-27-04, 04:56 PM
  #11  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but you guys with GT35s, what kind of power were you making, on what boost? What is the difference between the GT35, and the GT35/40? I am also looking at a GT35/40, 1.06 A/R exhaust housing. Any input on this?
Old 09-27-04, 05:07 PM
  #12  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
680RWHP12A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: chatsworth,Ca.
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
if your running a big turbo and lag is a problem for your type of driving//racing then yes its worth it... the downside is that the ball bearing turbos usally require more regular rebuilds(smoking) and they cost more....

my street car does not have a b/b turbo, but its only a 60-1 running 10 psi
my race car uses a b/b turbo but the turbo is huge! running 28 psi

hope that helps
Old 09-27-04, 05:09 PM
  #13  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
GT35R and GT3540 is the same turbo. The 1.06 hot side is the one i had. It was fine but you wont notice much more power from your single.
My R85 is much much larger. Like Chris said I havnt driven the car yet with the R85 as its being installed now. But the dyno shows it makes about 60+ HP at the same boost levels as my old GT35R. I went bigger because at first your worried about going to big and lag etc. Then once you own a single turbo you know its such a minor issue and it doesnt really effect driving like you worried it would, you end up going bigger.
Old 09-27-04, 05:15 PM
  #14  
Ga-nome liberator

 
SnowmanSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT35R is Ball Berring 35. 35/40 is a 35 compressor with a 40 exducer. Like stated above it depends on what you are looking for out of the car. If you are looking for high horsepower numbers and don't want a lot of lag, then bb would be a good choice. If you are looking for something that might be suited more for autocross, or street use then just go with a smaller turbo, and you most likely won't have a problem with spool time. But of course a larger turbo with bb can also be suited for autocross just depends on the turbo/porting/tuning. There are a few people out there running very large turbos that still see pretty good lag time compared with smaller turbos.

- Steiner
Old 10-02-04, 09:46 PM
  #15  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
He has, but he hasn't driven both so at this point he's speculating
.
What was I speculating about exactly?
Like I said The replacement repair costs are significantly different. I opted for a cheap turbo to repair/replace. something that will make the power I want without the worry.
WHile I havnt driven my car yet with the Bigger turbo all that i explained to you is basic truths about ball bearing vs standard thrust bearing turbos.
Like i said I think there is alot of hype with ny new product.
I have yet to really see them make a significant difference in power or spool. But there is an advantage there. And the initial cost is about the same for both kits. Its really the repair or replacement cost of the turbo and internals alone.
Old 10-02-04, 09:49 PM
  #16  
Rotary Freak

 
snub disphenoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ever think of getting a 60-1 or a 62-1? They can come in ball-bearing and a BB 60-1 will run you about 1500 bucks.
Old 10-03-04, 04:22 PM
  #17  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaryRevn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
if your running a big turbo and lag is a problem for your type of driving//racing then yes its worth it... the downside is that the ball bearing turbos usally require more regular rebuilds(smoking) and they cost more....

my street car does not have a b/b turbo, but its only a 60-1 running 10 psi
my race car uses a b/b turbo but the turbo is huge! running 28 psi

hope that helps

at what rpm does your 60-1 start to spool and do you know what power it's putting out at 10psi? How about 12 psi? Thanks
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
MoTeC
5
09-10-15 07:58 PM
thecody59
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
40
08-23-15 06:41 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
08-18-15 10:01 PM



Quick Reply: Ball-Bearing turbos, worth the extra cost?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.