Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Ball-Bearing turbos, worth the extra cost?

Old Sep 26, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Ball-Bearing turbos, worth the extra cost?

Im thinking of selling my Greddy kit and going with a garret turbo. Would something like the ball-bearing GT40R be worth all the extra cost over something like say, a T04E? The turbo itself is almost twice as expensive, and the only benifit I know of is the slightly quicker spool time. Its not that Im cheap, I just dont want to waste my money for something not really worth the cost. In case it matters, I want ~400 RWHP (FC), and mods in sig.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #2  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
Thats a huge question, Ive had a GT35R and I liked it. What always worried me was the replacement cost/repair costs.
Sean at A-spec said the cost has come way down on repairing them but from what I have seen there is a guy here on the forum having trouible getting a compressor wheel for his 40R. I blow motors on occasion and it hurts enough to buy new motors let alone having to spend out the butt for turbo's also. I went with a real cheap turbo to replace yet still make big power with decent spool. Although the performance of the Ball bearing do have a slight advantage in some respects.
Ive owned both. I think there is alot of Hype on any new product. Rotor motors blow more frequently and take thier toll on turbos. I push the motor too much to replace expensive turbos as often as motors.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Thanks for the response. So you went from a BB GT35R, to a similarly sized non-BB turbo. Could you tell any noticable difference in turbo response?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #4  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
Ive owned both. ...
He has, but he hasn't driven both so at this point he's speculating

I have driven Zoomzoom's car with the BB GT35R and I have a non ball bearing GT35 on my car with a slightly smaller AR, but a T4, rather than a T3 footprint. I didn't feel a difference in spool up between the two. However, neither of our cars were properly tuned and I didn't drive them back to back.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #5  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Thanks for the input, I dont think Im going to worry about it then, non-BB should be fine. While on the subject, here are the specs of the turbo I am looking at, could I get some feedback please?

T04 E , .70 A/R compressor , 1.00 A/R hotside, divided.
Compressor inducer diameter 2", exducer 2.95"
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 12:55 AM
  #6  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Do you have the trim or inducer/exducer size for the compressor wheel?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 04:18 AM
  #7  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
That inducer is a little on the small side. I very much doubt it will get you to ~400rwhp. You could, however, get a larger compressor wheel (T04E 57 or 60-trim, 60-1, etc.) and have the compressor housing machined to fit.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 07:02 AM
  #8  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Wheel is a P-trim. If this is too small, Im open to suggestions.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 09:19 AM
  #9  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Just step up to a T04S. Or if you can find one a 62-1. That will get you to where you need to be all day long and they'll both still spool just fine as long as you stay with the 1.00A/R. Just my .02 though.

Zach
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #10  
SlingShotRX7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: DC
According to my Tunner..
Ballbearing Turbos aren't worth the extra cost.
From what I understand, BB turbos are more prone
to failure and alot more expensive to rebuild.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #11  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but you guys with GT35s, what kind of power were you making, on what boost? What is the difference between the GT35, and the GT35/40? I am also looking at a GT35/40, 1.06 A/R exhaust housing. Any input on this?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #12  
680RWHP12A's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 2
From: chatsworth,Ca.
if your running a big turbo and lag is a problem for your type of driving//racing then yes its worth it... the downside is that the ball bearing turbos usally require more regular rebuilds(smoking) and they cost more....

my street car does not have a b/b turbo, but its only a 60-1 running 10 psi
my race car uses a b/b turbo but the turbo is huge! running 28 psi

hope that helps
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #13  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
GT35R and GT3540 is the same turbo. The 1.06 hot side is the one i had. It was fine but you wont notice much more power from your single.
My R85 is much much larger. Like Chris said I havnt driven the car yet with the R85 as its being installed now. But the dyno shows it makes about 60+ HP at the same boost levels as my old GT35R. I went bigger because at first your worried about going to big and lag etc. Then once you own a single turbo you know its such a minor issue and it doesnt really effect driving like you worried it would, you end up going bigger.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #14  
SnowmanSteiner's Avatar
Ga-nome liberator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Hell
GT35R is Ball Berring 35. 35/40 is a 35 compressor with a 40 exducer. Like stated above it depends on what you are looking for out of the car. If you are looking for high horsepower numbers and don't want a lot of lag, then bb would be a good choice. If you are looking for something that might be suited more for autocross, or street use then just go with a smaller turbo, and you most likely won't have a problem with spool time. But of course a larger turbo with bb can also be suited for autocross just depends on the turbo/porting/tuning. There are a few people out there running very large turbos that still see pretty good lag time compared with smaller turbos.

- Steiner
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #15  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
He has, but he hasn't driven both so at this point he's speculating
.
What was I speculating about exactly?
Like I said The replacement repair costs are significantly different. I opted for a cheap turbo to repair/replace. something that will make the power I want without the worry.
WHile I havnt driven my car yet with the Bigger turbo all that i explained to you is basic truths about ball bearing vs standard thrust bearing turbos.
Like i said I think there is alot of hype with ny new product.
I have yet to really see them make a significant difference in power or spool. But there is an advantage there. And the initial cost is about the same for both kits. Its really the repair or replacement cost of the turbo and internals alone.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #16  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Ever think of getting a 60-1 or a 62-1? They can come in ball-bearing and a BB 60-1 will run you about 1500 bucks.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #17  
RotaryRevn's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
if your running a big turbo and lag is a problem for your type of driving//racing then yes its worth it... the downside is that the ball bearing turbos usally require more regular rebuilds(smoking) and they cost more....

my street car does not have a b/b turbo, but its only a 60-1 running 10 psi
my race car uses a b/b turbo but the turbo is huge! running 28 psi

hope that helps

at what rpm does your 60-1 start to spool and do you know what power it's putting out at 10psi? How about 12 psi? Thanks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
MoTeC
5
Sep 10, 2015 07:58 PM
thecody59
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
40
Aug 23, 2015 06:41 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.