14 psi on twins and 14 on 60-1?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Qatar
14 psi on twins and 14 on 60-1?
whats up
i have a pettit unlimited ECU on my FD and the car ran rich even at 14 psi on the stock twins.
if i run a 60-1 with a 1.0 A/r at the same boost level will i need fuel?
and what if i go with a 62-1 with a .84 A/R ?
thanks alot
i have a pettit unlimited ECU on my FD and the car ran rich even at 14 psi on the stock twins.
if i run a 60-1 with a 1.0 A/r at the same boost level will i need fuel?
and what if i go with a 62-1 with a .84 A/R ?
thanks alot
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Re: 14 psi on twins and 14 on 60-1?
Originally posted by zooq
whats up
i have a pettit unlimited ECU on my FD and the car ran rich even at 14 psi on the stock twins.
if i run a 60-1 with a 1.0 A/r at the same boost level will i need fuel?
and what if i go with a 62-1 with a .84 A/R ?
thanks alot
whats up
i have a pettit unlimited ECU on my FD and the car ran rich even at 14 psi on the stock twins.
if i run a 60-1 with a 1.0 A/r at the same boost level will i need fuel?
and what if i go with a 62-1 with a .84 A/R ?
thanks alot
You are comparing apples to crabapples. They are both turbos but they do not flow the same amount of air at 14psi. The CFM is significantly different in terms of volume and density.
You are going to need more fuel, and less fuel in places. The single needs fuel in different places than the twins. Not to mention that lighting that fuel is different. Even more different if you're talking a ported engine.
Tony K.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Re: Re: 14 psi on twins and 14 on 60-1?
Originally posted by Badog
Hey Zoog,
You are comparing apples to crabapples. They are both turbos but they do not flow the same amount of air at 14psi. The CFM is significantly different in terms of volume and density.
You are going to need more fuel, and less fuel in places. The single needs fuel in different places than the twins. Not to mention that lighting that fuel is different. Even more different if you're talking a ported engine.
Tony K.
Hey Zoog,
You are comparing apples to crabapples. They are both turbos but they do not flow the same amount of air at 14psi. The CFM is significantly different in terms of volume and density.
You are going to need more fuel, and less fuel in places. The single needs fuel in different places than the twins. Not to mention that lighting that fuel is different. Even more different if you're talking a ported engine.
Tony K.
-Keith
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM