3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Running a FD N/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-17, 12:50 PM
  #1  
''I Like The Tuna Here''

Thread Starter
 
bigtuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Holland MA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MA Running a FD N/A?

Hey im looking to remove the twins and want togo single but its alot of cash anyway i can run the fd without the turbos? And if so what will i need to do to get it running for the tine being.
Old 07-05-17, 02:09 PM
  #2  
H_M
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
H_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CanuckVille
Posts: 624
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
Why don't you leave everything the way it is, collect all the parts first, and then (when you have everything) take your car apart and convert it to a single turbo?
Old 07-05-17, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,030
Received 879 Likes on 619 Posts
It will take more money to get it running N/A than its worth. Leave it as it is until you can afford a single. If that's not an option then you probably can't afford the car.
Old 07-05-17, 02:23 PM
  #4  
Martin S.

iTrader: (2)
 
evo_koa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 1,404
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
^ What he said
Old 07-05-17, 02:54 PM
  #5  
half ass 2 or whole ass 1

iTrader: (114)
 
cr-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: okinawa to tampa
Posts: 3,425
Received 481 Likes on 350 Posts
In agrreance with what everyone else is saying. I find it interesting that we went from this

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-rx-7-1993-2002-vehicles-107/full-re-gt300-widebody-fd-1105687/

To this thread... I have a feeling the attempt to go n/a will be made anyway followed by a part out.
Old 07-05-17, 03:18 PM
  #6  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
You just need an NA 13B header ($250) and will have to have a mid-pipe custom made to connect the header to the cat back section ($???) and a Power FC or other aftermarket ECU (stock base tune will be fine) ($500-1,500) and put an air filter ($25) on the throttle body elbow.
Probably want a cat (stock is fine) or all stainless pre-silencer in the mid-pipe since NA rotaries are LOUD.

Then you can remove as much emissions and twin turbo items as you want. If you just remove the twin turbo controls and leave the stock ECU you will get codes and probably a limp mode.

If you want to run stock ECU you can do that too, just leave all the twin turbo solenoids (rat's nest) in place.

Should make 150-180rwhp depending on whether you tune it or not.
Old 07-05-17, 03:21 PM
  #7  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
bigtuna
And if so what will i need to do to get it running for the tine being.
Uuuh, get it running?
Well, sounds like you need to find out why it stopped running fix that and then get a rebuild which won't be much harder if you leave it turbo.
Old 07-05-17, 04:55 PM
  #8  
Piston Head

iTrader: (5)
 
Littleguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 529
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Mine runs like a champ n/a.
Old 07-05-17, 07:07 PM
  #9  
Stock boost FTW!

iTrader: (22)
 
Project88Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,134
Received 110 Likes on 71 Posts
Your car may be running N/A, but you cheated. Bastard.

(Secretly jealous)
Vince
Old 07-06-17, 07:19 AM
  #10  
Constant threat

 
bajaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: near Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 4,952
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Littleguy
Mine runs like a champ n/a.

Don't go confusing the o.p., he may not see your sig line...
Old 07-11-17, 07:30 PM
  #11  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I ran my FD na for close to a year back in 09'
bought it non running turbos toast, wiring harness taken off to rewrap.
I bought a power fc and a used set of twins.
put them on and they just poured oil out. Total junk.

wasn't sure if it was oil control rings or turbos for sure
bolted a used fc header on, blocked off the oil feed,drains and coolant.
cut off the tb flange and welded one on the right size and angle to bolt to FD stock cat.

drove it na and no smoke screen. Tried a couple other junk sets and ended up waiting and saving up to have them rebuilt out of 5 sets of bad twins.
Old 07-11-17, 07:31 PM
  #12  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
It ran pretty rich I tweaked the tune a bit with the Pfc to improve idle, ect. Was quite slow and very loud. Felt about as slow as my s5 na very I had at the time
Old 07-13-17, 07:22 AM
  #13  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 430 Likes on 263 Posts
it could have been even slower than an s5 n/a, because an s5 n/a has a better intake manifold design and higher compression rotors.
Old 07-13-17, 09:36 AM
  #14  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,030
Received 879 Likes on 619 Posts
Originally Posted by KompressorLOgic
I ran my FD na for close to a year back in 09' ...
I applaud the ambition and no offense, but like a lot things I did when I was 20-something, you're gonna look back someday and think..."that was just f'ing wrong".
Old 07-13-17, 10:16 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
I am interested in what a REW would make NA as SCCA has a race class where engine swaps are allowed. Including engines that came factory turbocharged, but with turbos removed.

With no porting allowed in engine, intake, or exhaust, but seals, coatings, balancing, ecu, exhaust are free what could an NA REW make? would it make similar or more power than a S5 NA?

Same question with the S4/5 TII 13b minus turbo.

Last edited by Gilgamesh; 07-13-17 at 10:19 AM.
Old 07-13-17, 11:16 AM
  #16  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
Gilgamesh
I am interested in what a REW would make NA as SCCA has a race class where engine swaps are allowed. Including engines that came factory turbocharged, but with turbos removed.
Only "development" of stock 13B-REW and stock intake manifolds I have seen is from Anniversary Racing Factory in Japan who specialized in Naturally Aspirated rotary engine racing.

Looks like one that made the most power was 182.4PS or 180rwhp.

Injection NA
<Basic Plan 1>
+ E-manageUltimate injection NA sample vehicle

Base vehicle: RX - 7 (FD 3 S)
H7 year
Mileage: Approximately 65.000 km
Compression test F: 7.7 / 7.8 / 8.0 / 250 rpm
R: 8.5 / 8.2 / 8.5 / 250 rpm
External (HKS) muffler wearing







#31 on this page list

p[`FbNLO
Old 07-14-17, 11:24 AM
  #17  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
180 is pretty good considering the motor still has the air pump, ac, power steering and probably stock coils.
Old 07-14-17, 12:22 PM
  #18  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
Pretty good.

You can see entry #21 was 13B-REW with streetport and 9.7:1 rotors and did 208.4ps.

If the Original Poster can use any stock internal with stock intake manifold 13B the 13B-MSP seems to be the best.

Also cheapest on Ebay with $1,500 complete engine/trans available.

Entry #17 is their project RX-8. It did 180.7ps as RX-8s do and then they were able to tune it up to 220.5ps (217.4rwhp).




Here is the link to their blog on it-

RX-8@SE3P@ƒfƒ‚ƒJ[

https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/anniversar...E3P+%A5%C7&p=6

Last edited by BLUE TII; 07-14-17 at 12:32 PM.
Old 07-14-17, 12:37 PM
  #19  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
No, I'm sorry.

Looking at the Yahoo blog for the RX-8 it looks like they may have used the Racing Beat intake manifold/adapter to get up to the 217rwhp.

Makes sense since the most I have heard of from professional racing RX-8 with stock engine, stock intake manifold is just over 200rwhp.
Old 07-14-17, 01:50 PM
  #20  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
The a car with the renesis will have to weigh 3,000 lbs and have a 55mm restrictor.

The Cosmo 13b minus the turbos could be an option as well.

The 13B NA weight is at 2650 right now.
Old 07-14-17, 01:52 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
coleparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KompressorLOgic
It ran pretty rich I tweaked the tune a bit with the Pfc to improve idle, ect. Was quite slow and very loud. Felt about as slow as my s5 na very I had at the time
How long did you drive it like this? Just curious




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.