gas motorsports 2041 hp supra engine
#51
Diamond Cut Seven
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: with all the rare parts
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Pistons I've rebuilt an LT1, V-tec's and what not. To lazy to list em though... I'm not here for interview I'm stating the facts and laws of physics. If you want to count each indivual one of the rotor bearings and the compessor wheels in the turbos too you can go ahead if it makes make you feel better.
Like I said the theory Achems Razr will prevail in high stress situations.
#52
#57
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...8pushrodmullet
Everyone wants the rotary to fail.
I posted Crispeed's quote where brent laughs at their setup cus it pushes 45lbs while he's in the 70's and 80lbs!!! SO the whole argument of "why don't rotaries push the same boost as pistons doesn't really apply.
#58
Talk to me....
iTrader: (2)
These arguements are stupid imo. They are just two completely different designs and I personally believe the only way to compare them is by the absolute highest hp output of the engine regardless of the boost needed to achieve it.
Last edited by Uncle Hungry; 01-22-08 at 06:18 PM.
#62
eccentric shafter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EARTH
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
gas motorsports 2041 hp supra engine
well if you have two engines of similar displacement and you run 75+lbs on one and 45+lbs on the other and both run the same time you figure it out.
#63
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On my first rotor ~
Pistons I've rebuilt an LT1, V-tec's and what not. To lazy to list em though... I'm not here for interview I'm stating the facts and laws of physics. If you want to count each indivual one of the rotor bearings and the compessor wheels in the turbos too you can go ahead if it makes make you feel better.
Like I said the theory Achems Razr will prevail in high stress situations.
Pistons I've rebuilt an LT1, V-tec's and what not. To lazy to list em though... I'm not here for interview I'm stating the facts and laws of physics. If you want to count each indivual one of the rotor bearings and the compessor wheels in the turbos too you can go ahead if it makes make you feel better.
Like I said the theory Achems Razr will prevail in high stress situations.
everyone says rotary engines have 4 moving parts. yet there are springs, side seals, corner seals, etc etc. it adds up to alot more than the "4" everyone seems to repeat.
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
#65
While to some it seems unfeasible we can use the whole FWD in racing argument. The automotive industry changed to FWD and the racing bodies had to work their *** off to implement and EFFICIENTLY compete against what was once considered the industry standard. The suspension technology EVOLVED in LEAPS AND BOUNDS in order for this new system to be competitive and here we are today, watching FWD integras and other cars succesfully and competitively race in SCCA.
Who is to say we're not on the same track? Granted the development is much slower considering that MAZDA is the only automaker todays investing in this technology as opposed to the MAJORITY of automakers going to FWD to save $$
#66
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
iTrader: (1)
everyone says rotary engines have 4 moving parts. yet there are springs, side seals, corner seals, etc etc. it adds up to alot more than the "4" everyone seems to repeat.
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
-J
#67
Talk to me....
iTrader: (2)
But you need a larger turbo with the rotary and probably as much fuel as it would take to run the 75psi on the piston motor, it would not be the case given two equal compressors. Keep in mind this is a 4cyl were talking about. I mean I not bashing rotaries I just don't see what some of you guys are saying. I mean even pro fwd guys are knocking on 6's now.
Last edited by Uncle Hungry; 01-22-08 at 06:34 PM.
#68
Diamond Cut Seven
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: with all the rare parts
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
everyone says rotary engines have 4 moving parts. yet there are springs, side seals, corner seals, etc etc. it adds up to alot more than the "4" everyone seems to repeat.
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
Reliability? I think it's more budget ability is the correct term. When the PROPER materials are used such as cermix and the correct port as well as maybe NOT running the worlds most complicated sequential turbo system with over 30 solenoids might help? Oh yeah that was made in 1993 right? I'm not just going to specify the FD though.
#70
everyone says rotary engines have 4 moving parts. yet there are springs, side seals, corner seals, etc etc. it adds up to alot more than the "4" everyone seems to repeat.
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
everyone says that piston engines have so many moving parts, its bad, etc etc.. which engines are more reliable?
Look at the DNF cars towards the bottom.
http://www.experiencelemans.com/en-us/dept_146.html
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/121020...e-failure.html
^^mind you these are race PREPPED motors and even then it's not so "reliable"
Last edited by phoenix7; 01-22-08 at 06:41 PM.
#71
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seals move?
Reliability? I think it's more budget ability is the correct term. When the PROPER materials are used such as cermix and the correct port as well as maybe NOT running the worlds most complicated sequential turbo system with over 30 solenoids might help? Oh yeah that was made in 1993 right? I'm not just going to specify the FD though.
Reliability? I think it's more budget ability is the correct term. When the PROPER materials are used such as cermix and the correct port as well as maybe NOT running the worlds most complicated sequential turbo system with over 30 solenoids might help? Oh yeah that was made in 1993 right? I'm not just going to specify the FD though.
#72
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.engine-builder.com/ar/ar79938.htm
Look at the DNF cars towards the bottom.
http://www.experiencelemans.com/en-us/dept_146.html
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/121020...e-failure.html
Look at the DNF cars towards the bottom.
http://www.experiencelemans.com/en-us/dept_146.html
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/121020...e-failure.html
and what does that prove? do you want me to go take pictures of rotary engines ive pulled apart with internal damage?
#74
Diamond Cut Seven
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: with all the rare parts
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I'd call that vibration not forced movement. If thats the case then you might as well consider every bolt and stud to the engine a moving part since they all do have some vibration regardless if it can be seen by the human eye or not.
#75
Basically, the point is:
the R&D for piston engines has been great for the past 100 years. In that time we've pretty much come up with an almost IDIOT proof motor that can take the abuse but the same applies with the rotary, we're just 60 years behind the "big elderly boys"