Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

UK vc US dyno figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 07:34 AM
  #1  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
UK vs US dyno figures

Hi Guy's

I have been told by someone in the US that my rwhp 368 on my to4r 0.84 a/r
is very good figure becuase the dynapacks used inthe UK generally reads 15%
lower than the dynojet often used in the US therefore he says my 368 rwhp if it was dyno'd in the US on a dyno jet would of been approx 423rwhp can anyone confimr this is true? I have always kind of wondered why hp figures in US was generally a lot higher compared to the UK for similar setup etc..

rgds


--------------------

Brian Ellis (Rotary Imports Ltd)
www.rotaryimports.com
info@rotaryimports.com
tel:07950-693-616
fax:0208-405-9580

Last edited by BNA_ELLIS; Jun 11, 2004 at 07:46 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Dynapacks typically read lower than Dynojets (doesn't necessarily matter what country they are in). However, I've never seen an exact percentage of the difference being consistant. Most of the differences I've seen have been around 4-5% difference.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 09:02 AM
  #3  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
Thanks for reply,

I actually made a typo it's a dyno dynamics dynamometer not a dynopack.

rgds
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #4  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
Dyno Dynamics reads very accurately!
There usually about 10-15% lower then Dynojet
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 02:41 AM
  #5  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
Thanks for clarification Enzo.

rgds
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #6  
osdesigns's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Bay area
Yes, Dyno Dynamic is one of the most accurate dynos out there.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 01:17 AM
  #7  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
The spec's for the 450 dyno dynamics model list twin 8.5" rollers. This twin roller method increases tire flex load losses vs single 48" dynojet roller for 2 reasons:

1) drive wheel support load increase of about 15%, due to load vectoring.

2) 8.5" roller pair pinch into the tire much more than the big dynojet 48" roller.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 06:28 AM
  #8  
bill Shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: UK
dynojets are inertial dynos, so at best the results are a stab in the dark. In terms of using them to work out actual HP they are worthless. shops buy them because they are cheap and the unitiated like having a power run to brag about.

They have also led to this culture of quoting RWHP and thinking it means something. It doesn't. A coast down test to calculate rolling losses on an eddy current dyno is the closest you will get to a repeatable and usable figure, but even then, with an uncalibrated dyno you are still nowhere unless you are comparing 2 cars on the same day on the same dyno.

Don't believe me. Next time you do a dynojet run, repeat it with another 10PSI in the tyres. Then put 185 width rubber on and try again.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zyph3r
Canadian Forum
10
Sep 16, 2018 07:14 PM
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Oct 29, 2015 06:47 AM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
Oct 7, 2015 04:04 PM
Rbkouki
V-8 Powered RX-7's
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.