Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Rotary sound difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-07, 05:51 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Sandman FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Okinawa Japan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary sound difference

Ive always wondered why 2 rotor engines sound something like 4 cylinders, 3 rotor engines sound like I-6's and 4 rotors sound like F-1 cars only better.
But yet I went to a race at VIR and there were these 20B rx-8s which sounded just like the 787B. But they were perephial port also. So heres the question does a perephial port 2 rotor engine sound like a 787b? or some thing else
Old 05-16-07, 08:09 PM
  #2  
FC Mobsta

 
marcus219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i thinks in P port motors in general that sound like what your describing...although i could be very wrong.
Old 05-17-07, 07:21 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
auricom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dearborn Michigan
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would imagine its a combination of higher revs (more explosions per second) and the sound bouncing around and out of the p port. the p port engine will have a MUCH larger overlap than an ordinary port, so i'm sure that creates all sorts of unique harmonics bouncing around the engine. i would imagine that any rotary with a p port would have extensive engine balancing and such to allow them to rev to at least 10,000 rpm. i don't think you get much power in a p port below 4,000 rpm, and anyone with the money to p port a 3 rotor and drop it in a new RX-8 would likely spend aditional money on getting their revs up. i would guess the p-port engines were naturally aspirated, so a lack of turbo will considerably alter the exhaust and intake note. if they WERE turbo, then frickin' sweet
Old 05-17-07, 07:25 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
auricom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dearborn Michigan
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did the 787b's R26B engine have the same rotor dimensions as the 13B/20B...i think its 80mm rotor thickness with a max volume of 0.635 liters per rotor face. i know the 787b rotors had the same max volume per face (since its an R26B), but i wonder if they were...ehem..."de-stroked" at all, with a rotor deeper than 80mm (higher "bore"). anyone know?
Old 05-17-07, 09:05 AM
  #5  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Sandman FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Okinawa Japan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nah the rx8's were NA but the team said they were putting down 420 hp
Old 05-17-07, 09:09 AM
  #6  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Sandman FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Okinawa Japan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by auricom
did the 787b's R26B engine have the same rotor dimensions as the 13B/20B...i think its 80mm rotor thickness with a max volume of 0.635 liters per rotor face. i know the 787b rotors had the same max volume per face (since its an R26B), but i wonder if they were...ehem..."de-stroked" at all, with a rotor deeper than 80mm (higher "bore"). anyone know?
im not to sure about that I thought I read somewhere that they were close to the same. R26B rotors dont look like your average rotor in any street 13B or 20B though.
Old 05-17-07, 12:40 PM
  #7  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
The R26B rotors did have the same dimensions as the 13B rotors in the street cars. However they were custom made with 10.0:1 compression so they aren't just your average everyday off the shelf rotors.
Old 05-19-07, 09:35 AM
  #8  
doesn't make enough money

 
ProChemBroTCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lilburn, GA
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, I want some 10:1 rotors. That would be fine even in my plain ol' 2 rotor. You are right though, those racing rotary engines make such an intoxicating exhaust note; how could you not love that sound?
Old 05-19-07, 09:24 PM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
Attila the Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Apex, NC, USA
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a matter of frequency: higher frequencies have higher pitches. In any given time interval, a 3-rotor puts out more pulses than a 2-rotor, and a 4-rotor puts out even more.
Old 05-21-07, 02:37 AM
  #10  
Full Member

 
Sanspistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, don't know about all that, guys. But I went to the 24 hrs of Daytona and the RX 8's on the high banks had the most gorgeous scream you've ever heard in your life. So I say 3 rotors=Formula One howl!!! Never tired of hearing it even at 4:00 in the morning (if only the stupid PA guy would have shut up!!).

By the way; one of the RX 8 guys told me 500+ hp... Again, don't know but only the leading prototypes could catch and pass them in the infield straits. The 911's had better top end, though...

Sanspistons: totally ruined for 2 hr races; I want to go back!!!
Old 05-21-07, 10:40 AM
  #11  
I need a new user title

 
PercentSevenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Yaizu, Japan
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, a 2-rotor fires twice per revolution, same as a 4-cylinder. A 3-rotor fires three times per revolution, like a 6-cylinder. A 4-rotor fires four times per revolution, as do 8-cylinders. So it makes sense that they would sound somewhat similar.
Old 05-26-07, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
I noticed an interesting effect when I upgraded my old REPU to a direct fire ignition system similar to what's found in an FC. The exhaust note sounded like it had more pulses per RPM than before, like comparing a stock 1st gen to a 2nd gen.

I've noticed similar effects when adding direct fire to other old school rotaries. That late leading spark (sometimes called wasted spark) changes the exhaust note in subtle ways. It occours 180° after the initial leading spark and must be burning left over fuel at the trailing edge of the rotor to produce an audible change in the exhaust note. I even tried it on my 20B and it sounded a little bit different from everyone elses 20B.
Old 05-26-07, 12:52 PM
  #13  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
rxtasy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 9,310
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 237 Posts
2 rotor engine will NEVER sound like 4 cylinders. something's wrong with ur hearing.
Old 05-27-07, 01:46 AM
  #14  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
Uh, I'm affraid they do... sort of. That is to say a stock 1st gen ignition system sorta does. Once you upgrade to direct fire with the dual leading sparks, it sounds uniquely rotary.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo-minivan
Introduce yourself
3
08-27-15 07:56 AM
ppritchard
Interior / Exterior / Audio
1
08-21-15 06:02 PM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM



Quick Reply: Rotary sound difference



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.