New Drag Times Thread
Originally posted by tcb100
All nonsequential stock twins except Wyum who had some sort of upgraded twins, all with a midpipe.
Kevin Wyum 11.13 125.00
AnthonyNYC 11.15 122.35
Brooks Weisblatt 11.21
Brian Dowling 11.42 120.60
Boostn7 11.56 122.00
ErnieT 11.69 119.00
Ryan (don't be a Rikki) 11.78 116.38
Redline 53 11.80 116.00
Sequential Twins, Midpipe
The DJ 11.30 118.00
Silver7 11.66 118.00
RTS3gen 11.77 116.77
Red_Line_53 11.80 116.00
All nonsequential stock twins except Wyum who had some sort of upgraded twins, all with a midpipe.
Kevin Wyum 11.13 125.00
AnthonyNYC 11.15 122.35
Brooks Weisblatt 11.21
Brian Dowling 11.42 120.60
Boostn7 11.56 122.00
ErnieT 11.69 119.00
Ryan (don't be a Rikki) 11.78 116.38
Redline 53 11.80 116.00
Sequential Twins, Midpipe
The DJ 11.30 118.00
Silver7 11.66 118.00
RTS3gen 11.77 116.77
Red_Line_53 11.80 116.00
Is Boostn7 the only one who ran that time with stock twins and non ported motor?
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Here are some times we ran in New Zealand at the weekend:
My 20B JC Cosmo (stock, with street tyres) ran 14.309 at 102.25mph. Heaps of wheelspin, so the 60ft sucks...
A friend's 808/RX3 4door 12A turbo (factory stock engine) ran 13.19 at 109.5mph. This is a street car on MT ET Street drag tyres.
The ex-Australian PAC Performance 13BT RX3 coupe ran a 9.79, but its a dedicated race car.
My 20B JC Cosmo (stock, with street tyres) ran 14.309 at 102.25mph. Heaps of wheelspin, so the 60ft sucks...
A friend's 808/RX3 4door 12A turbo (factory stock engine) ran 13.19 at 109.5mph. This is a street car on MT ET Street drag tyres.
The ex-Australian PAC Performance 13BT RX3 coupe ran a 9.79, but its a dedicated race car.
1st gen NA streetport 13B
60' - 1.9753
330' - 5.6848
1/8 ET - 8.7280
1/8 mph - 81.64
1000' ET - 11.3263
1/4 ET - 13.5378
1/4 mph - 102.06
Streetport NA 4 port 13B in an 85 GSL-SE, Holley 600dp. RB intake, exhaust, flywheel, pullies.
Tires: 205/60-14 Nankang
608' elevation, 50*F, 2430 lbs at time of run.
330' - 5.6848
1/8 ET - 8.7280
1/8 mph - 81.64
1000' ET - 11.3263
1/4 ET - 13.5378
1/4 mph - 102.06
Streetport NA 4 port 13B in an 85 GSL-SE, Holley 600dp. RB intake, exhaust, flywheel, pullies.
Tires: 205/60-14 Nankang
608' elevation, 50*F, 2430 lbs at time of run.
Dvcn: I like your times, have you tuned your Holley? Do you know what is done to it? I have a 600 also, but not a DP. All I have done to mine is plug my power valve and got a metring block for my sec jets. I am running 65 prims jets and 73 secs. What are you running? I need to richen my prims! 68's?
no good 1/4 times, but my best 1/8th was 7.62 @ 92.2
i have a '93 R1 with almost every mod you can bolt on except a single (coming very soon). dynoed at 336rwhp, but was runnin a couple psi less than normal when that pass was made. also had 245 wide nitto 555r's on stock fd wheels
i have a '93 R1 with almost every mod you can bolt on except a single (coming very soon). dynoed at 336rwhp, but was runnin a couple psi less than normal when that pass was made. also had 245 wide nitto 555r's on stock fd wheels
R/T - 1.018
60' - 2.136
330 - 6.255
1/8 - 9.732
MPH - 70.13
1000' - 12.747
1/4 - 15.277
MPH - 89.10
Stock 86 SE 106k miles, no cats, rb cat back, cone filter, and bald 205s
60' - 2.136
330 - 6.255
1/8 - 9.732
MPH - 70.13
1000' - 12.747
1/4 - 15.277
MPH - 89.10
Stock 86 SE 106k miles, no cats, rb cat back, cone filter, and bald 205s
Last edited by totallimmortal; Mar 5, 2004 at 04:52 PM.
well, i luanch at around 3500-4000 and slip the clutch. i'm at the edge of adhesion and i can only manage 2.3's. i have 245 yoko avs es100's. they feel like they're gripping really well, but when i see the time slip, it says 2.3. what can i do???
i do slip the clutch. i hold the rpm around 4000, and when it's time to launch, i slip the clutch and floor it. i try to use the clutch to control the rpms. if i let the clutch out too fast, i'll wheel hop and if i let the clutch out too slow, it just revs higher and i don't really go anywhere.
there is a guy around here that is said to be able to launch anything. i'll let him have a go at it next time at the track.
there is a guy around here that is said to be able to launch anything. i'll let him have a go at it next time at the track.
Last edited by fstrnyou; Mar 7, 2004 at 09:50 PM.
Well if your up for it i'd say try what I did i mean it was only my 4th time dragging my car and i popped the clutch at 6500, i burnt out alot but still got bettre times then when i launched lower, thats when i got wheel hop
totallimmortal: If you want your RT times down go on the last light before green! When I figured that out my RT's came way down, .5 is supposed to be ideal? Now since I know the secret, my slow RT's .8, I hope this helps, it helped me out!
Thanks i would like to bring that down, but it won't affect my 1/4 mile or 60ft times but anway that was my worst rt f the day my others were .607, .889, and .736, not great but much better than taking over a second after the light turned green
Something that will bring down your times would be a deep stage, that is when you line up, you stop as soon as the light turns on. It will give you a few more inches to get up to speed before you brake the laser and start you time. Their is shallow and deep stageing. Iam NOT an expert, just read abou it before.
It may be the other way around deep being closer to the line and shallow being farther from the line, either way if you stop as soon as the light comes on you will have a few inches to get going before starting the clock! That will bring your time down slightly.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 2
From: North Atlanta, GA
Deep staging would get your reaction time quicker but 1/4 time slower and the other way around for not going deep.
Usually used by people that bracket race a lot. Basically you don't have to have a quicker car to actually beat someone at the track. For example a low 14s car can beat a mid to high 13s car.
Usually used by people that bracket race a lot. Basically you don't have to have a quicker car to actually beat someone at the track. For example a low 14s car can beat a mid to high 13s car.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 2
From: North Atlanta, GA
Yes, it's all about driver consistency in bracket racing. I guess what i was trying to say is that by deep staging it's possible to win the race even if you don't bracket race. If you get a quicker reaction time and take off better you can get across the finish line quicker while still having a slower ET time than your opponent. So basically winning the race with a slower elapsed time.


