Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Latest Experiment…Failure!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-08, 06:26 AM
  #101  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Looks really nice Adam.

Are you using the TB (Throttle Body) heater line for something? If it is just by-passing the exhaust side of the engine I would plug it.
Barry
Old 06-30-08, 11:03 AM
  #102  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry Bordes
Looks really nice Adam.

Are you using the TB (Throttle Body) heater line for something? If it is just by-passing the exhaust side of the engine I would plug it.
Barry
Throttle body heater line at the back of the motor is plumbed back to the thermostat housing. Explain your reasoning? Maybe I'm missing something.
Old 06-30-08, 09:24 PM
  #103  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
Throttle body heater line at the back of the motor is plumbed back to the thermostat housing. Explain your reasoning? Maybe I'm missing something.
My thought is, why bypass any cooling fluid past the exhaust side of the engine? The least resistance rule would rob cooling water from the engine. That reminds me, doesn't the heater core bypass water also?
Barry
Old 07-01-08, 11:42 AM
  #104  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry Bordes
My thought is, why bypass any cooling fluid past the exhaust side of the engine? The least resistance rule would rob cooling water from the engine. That reminds me, doesn't the heater core bypass water also?
Barry
The heater core does bypass water and lots of it. I don't know, if Mazda did it right they would have took into account the throttle body heater line and heater core line, and as such they're really isn't much to be gained by blocking off both. The main reason I jumpered the TB line to the front is to allow a passage for air to escape the system that would otherwise be trapped at the back of the motor. It is the second highest cooling point on the motor.

[/QUOTE]

[/QUOTE]
Attached Thumbnails -dsc06582.jpg   -dsc08441.jpg  
Old 07-01-08, 03:13 PM
  #105  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
The heater core does bypass water and lots of it. I don't know, if Mazda did it right they would have took into account the throttle body heater line and heater core line, and as such they're really isn't much to be gained by blocking off both. The main reason I jumpered the TB line to the front is to allow a passage for air to escape the system that would otherwise be trapped at the back of the motor. It is the second highest cooling point on the motor.

Yes a very good place to burp the system. Still how much water flow can we afford to bypass?

Nice looking fuel pressure sensor. Your engine really is gathering bling! The gold foil looks so trick.
Barry
Old 07-01-08, 03:20 PM
  #106  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
An inline restrictor pill would allow burping but limit bypass flow at the TB line.

As far as the heater core.....an inline shut-off valve?? Though, I really don't want to do that. I'll give this some thought.

Racing Bling Baby
Old 07-01-08, 03:31 PM
  #107  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
An inline restrictor pill would allow burping but limit bypass flow at the TB line.

As far as the heater core.....an inline shut-off valve?? Though, I really don't want to do that. I'll give this some thought.

Racing Bling Baby
Yes RBB,
Maybe a restrictor in the heater line also, that way the heater core would be less likely to corrode.
Barry
Old 07-01-08, 11:22 PM
  #108  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
good to see a thread with this much good updates on there ... where do you spot that gold shielding though?
Old 07-02-08, 12:41 AM
  #109  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Viton restrictor pill in. And here's your gold shielding pic.

[/QUOTE]

[/QUOTE]
Attached Thumbnails -dsc09965.jpg   -dsc09966.jpg  
Old 07-02-08, 06:56 AM
  #110  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
Viton restrictor pill in. And here's your gold shielding pic.
Simple but elegant.

Seals well, no corrosion.

I usually rap a piece of colored tape around the restrictor location to remind me of its presence.

Barry
Old 07-02-08, 11:31 AM
  #111  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Good idea on the tape, I might do that.

You know what would be cool is a compact electric motor actuated shutoff off valve that would be used at the return line for the heater core. I can easily get them, but they're bulky and ungodly expensive; especially the stainless steel units.

Or just do a manual one:
http://www.rcaccessory.com/index.asp...ROD&ProdID=267

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/p/7911...ff-Valves.html

http://www.pexsupply.com/product_dtl...droPEX&cID=347
Old 07-02-08, 01:55 PM
  #112  
*** Bless The USA

iTrader: (8)
 
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saint Louis / Illinois
Posts: 7,139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn, looks like you're off to the moon with all that foil !
Old 07-02-08, 03:09 PM
  #113  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Funny, your not the first to make the space flight comment.
Attached Thumbnails -as17-140-21391.jpg  
Old 07-02-08, 09:46 PM
  #114  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
Good idea on the tape, I might do that.

You know what would be cool is a compact electric motor actuated shutoff off valve that would be used at the return line for the heater core. I can easily get them, but they're bulky and ungodly expensive; especially the stainless steel units.

Or just do a manual one:
I like that idea. We could easily switch off/on to test for any improvement. Plus when we get a cool front.......

Barry
Old 07-05-08, 09:25 PM
  #115  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
I was talking with Chuck Westbrook today and he brought up an interesting question. Has anyone using synthetic oil seen the carbon spots on both sides of the spark plug holes?

Chuck’s contention was that since the housing gets to be 400şF wouldn’t it be logical for there to be carbon produced in that area.
Very true, since mineral oils die before that 400şF.

My thoughts were that the seal would soon wear it off if the housing was flat in that area, and that the hot spark plug boss was the problem for the stains and possibly the main cause of apex seal breakage…..

Anyway has anyone using synthetic oil not seen the carbon stains?

Barry

Old 07-06-08, 01:33 AM
  #116  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Barry,
If you recall my auto engine ran on synthetic oil before I got it.... Still had the black marks.

-J
Old 07-07-08, 10:35 AM
  #117  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
Barry,
If you recall my auto engine ran on synthetic oil before I got it.... Still had the black marks.

-J
True, anyone else?
Barry
Old 07-21-08, 09:30 PM
  #118  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ronbros3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin TX.
Posts: 862
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most localized overheat causes an actual bubble to form at the plug area, bubble can not transfer any heat away from that area, and temps skyrocket in only that area, wont show on temp gage, I use Evans coolant does not allow bubbles to form,400* boiling point. no water at all to boil. and my water pump mods,might not work for everyone. but used a machined S4 pump with a big impellor from a 1975 Cosmo pump, very hi volume and hi pressure flow. YUP! did these mods about 10yrs ago. Thx Ron
Old 07-22-08, 01:26 AM
  #119  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
curious how much does that gold shielding reduce intake temperatures? I've got a new heatshield in there but still is hotter than what i'd like. Also who make it? also do you use any special gaskets inbetween the engine and the intake to reduce temp transfer? Sorry to get a bit off topic ...
Old 07-22-08, 11:16 AM
  #120  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

Thread Starter
 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ronbros3
most localized overheat causes an actual bubble to form at the plug area, bubble can not transfer any heat away from that area, and temps skyrocket in only that area, wont show on temp gage, I use Evans coolant does not allow bubbles to form,400* boiling point. no water at all to boil. and my water pump mods,might not work for everyone. but used a machined S4 pump with a big impellor from a 1975 Cosmo pump, very hi volume and hi pressure flow. YUP! did these mods about 10yrs ago. Thx Ron
Ronbros,
Thanks for the tips on the water pump.
The extra flow from the pump would be a big help. Is the impeller on the 1975 Cosmo pump the same as the newer RE engine's pump?
Barry

Old 07-22-08, 12:58 PM
  #121  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ronbros3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin TX.
Posts: 862
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know if the RE impellor is the same as 1975 Cosmo imp, cosmo imp was about 3/8 " larger in diameter, than S4 turbo pump, made of cast iron so could be polished and shaped, had to machine the housing to make it fit with a tite clearnce, as i remember the s4 had a pretty wide clearence, like 1/8", tighter you can make it more pressure the pump can make, volume you get from the diameter, and smoothing things out to enhance flow. its all basic hotrod ideas from the last 40-50yrs. when you get guys thinkin they can come up with good S#^T, the internet has just sped up all the info. Thx Ron
Old 07-23-08, 03:16 PM
  #122  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,896
Received 175 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry Bordes
Are you referring to the 1/8” groove cut between the housing running surface and the bolt hole boss.

Good example,dj55b, it looks like the larger 16X housing allows larger cooling tunnels.

Barry
just a quick correction here, the 16x housings are the same external size as the current renesis. The internal size is what increased for the larger rotor thus making the rotor housings "thinner" and the cooling passages smaller in the perpendicular direction.

the 16x is shorter also, with the narrower rotors; and much lighter since its all aluminum...
Old 07-24-08, 06:38 AM
  #123  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
jantore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 912
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Barry what do u think has happend here?



My old housings did not look like this at all, this housing is brand new, and has maybe 30-40 hours on them. Now i should say that im running BUR9EQP on E85 on this engine. And also using a castor based 2 stroke syntethic oil. I used to use AGIP 2 stroke racing oil before and my old housings look realy good.

Jan-Tore
Old 07-24-08, 08:52 AM
  #124  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
just a quick correction here, the 16x housings are the same external size as the current renesis. The internal size is what increased for the larger rotor thus making the rotor housings "thinner" and the cooling passages smaller in the perpendicular direction.

the 16x is shorter also, with the narrower rotors; and much lighter since its all aluminum...
Hmm i remember reading somewhere tha they stated that it was wider and heigher than the pre-existing 13b engines.
Old 07-24-08, 11:15 AM
  #125  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Nope same external profile to the 13B.

Update:

EGTs were dead nuts when on the dyno, note I'm running a GZ LIM, but still it's looking like the front and rear rotors are pretty close as far as AFRs.

Only minor coolant blow-by at the lower earl fitting on the rear rotor. Will be going to a more flexible setup later.

My timing curves are still conservative at this time, once I have more time to spend on a dyno to finish the maps I will post what I was able to acheive before I experience minor knock. As it stands I'm at 400whp and 300 ft-lbs at 15psi on pump with premix.

This weekend will be a true stress test a far as coolant performance with the Time Attack. Wish me luck!

Adam


Quick Reply: Latest Experiment…Failure!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.