Just got the car off the dyno...
06-06-02, 09:01 AM
#1
10.32 @ 133
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got the car off the dyno...
Final result was 354rwkw (471rwhp) and was on a Dynamic Test Systems dyno, which ready around 15% less than a Dynojet.
Fuel was C16. Boost was 26psi. Plugs were BUR9EQ. A/F was 11.7. Tune was by HITman.
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_1.mpg
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_2.mpg
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_3.mpg
Dyno graphs to come....
I am pumped boys
Fuel was C16. Boost was 26psi. Plugs were BUR9EQ. A/F was 11.7. Tune was by HITman.
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_1.mpg
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_2.mpg
http://www.ajc13b.com/dyno_3.mpg
Dyno graphs to come....
I am pumped boys
06-06-02, 09:26 AM
#5
root
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AJC13B
10 degrees split. Tried 0 split and lost 10kw.
I am hunting down a 10 heat range in the surface dishcharge type plug....
10 degrees split. Tried 0 split and lost 10kw.
I am hunting down a 10 heat range in the surface dishcharge type plug....
-Zach
06-06-02, 09:34 AM
#6
10.32 @ 133
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HITman played with a 13B PP earlier today and tinkered with lead/trailing split and the engine didn't like it at all, it missed actually I think he said. And we lost 10kw doing it on mine....odd
Trending Topics
06-06-02, 11:43 PM
#12
10.32 @ 133
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TA45
72 a/r cover with 68mm blade
1.05 exhaust housing with 68mm blade
The newer TA series turbos are larger frame turbos than the generic T04 size turbos.
72 a/r cover with 68mm blade
1.05 exhaust housing with 68mm blade
The newer TA series turbos are larger frame turbos than the generic T04 size turbos.
06-07-02, 05:37 AM
#17
inteligent extratarestril
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zyounker
Cool.. Just wanted to know because we cracked my friends rear plate running 9s and thought it was either the plugs or the 0 split timming..
-Zach
Cool.. Just wanted to know because we cracked my friends rear plate running 9s and thought it was either the plugs or the 0 split timming..
-Zach
Cracking plates seems to be the result of detonation caused by too higher intake charge often the result of a T04 hybridised with the stock compressor running more boost that the octane rating of the fuel allows. More of a case of pre ignition i think
06-07-02, 06:39 AM
#20
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by VELCRO SHOES
thats a big bish,bigger than my HKS T51R-KAI.
thats a big bish,bigger than my HKS T51R-KAI.
Steve, Congrats on the power numbers. Thats 9 second power. Strip that friggen car down and run some 9s
Last edited by Greg; 06-07-02 at 07:33 AM.
06-07-02, 07:30 AM
#23
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AJC13B,
Put some fuel in it first and try some NGK R6725-115 spark plugs at the higher boost you may be impressed. At 26psi you should just be starting to wake that turbocharger up. Congrats!
REgards-Anthony
Put some fuel in it first and try some NGK R6725-115 spark plugs at the higher boost you may be impressed. At 26psi you should just be starting to wake that turbocharger up. Congrats!
REgards-Anthony