Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Can i do a bridge and a peripheral port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-08, 09:12 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
lizardsbba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can i do a bridge and a peripheral port

titles kinda self explanatory. if so why or why not. and whats better or what should i do and can i do it myself like buy a template.
Old 02-09-08, 09:42 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
61620B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lots of practice for both and good machinery.

Also need some good tools.
Old 02-10-08, 03:43 AM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
You can but why?

BP gives you advantages due to it's duration and early opening.
The PP gives you both with a LOT more.
Unless you're talking about a really tiny PP?


-Ted
Old 02-10-08, 10:04 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
lizardsbba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so i should just do a pp? were can i get a template for that and about how hard is it?
Old 02-10-08, 10:55 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
If you're asking how to do it...don't.


-Ted
Old 02-10-08, 11:12 AM
  #6  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Most people do a street port or bridgeport because it's a lot easier. But a peripheral port makes more power than a bridgeport. A street port is still popular in spite of lower power because it doesn't have the practical problems that a bridgeport or peripheral port has. That's why it'd be nigh impossible to see a bridgeport or peripheral port in a factory car, whereas larger and larger "street ports" are coming with each new rotary model.
Old 02-10-08, 12:15 PM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Generally speaking, NO. A PP has tons of volume and timing already, you probably can't make use of any more from the side ports.

If it's for street use then don't PP. To get it quiet enough for street use you'll be severely choking it and it'll be way down on power. At that point you'll be making about as much as you would with a good bridge, where the bridge would be a lot cheaper.

Do yourself a favour and do a lot of research on both before doing anything about it.
Old 02-10-08, 03:14 PM
  #8  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
If you're asking how to do it...don't.


-Ted


LOL You crack me up Ted.
Old 02-10-08, 06:55 PM
  #9  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Generally speaking, NO. A PP has tons of volume and timing already, you probably can't make use of any more from the side ports.
There's a few people out there running combo bridge, P-Port's they must have some secret figured out
Old 02-10-08, 07:16 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well there's a semi-PP, then there's a PP. With the semi it's just a very small peripheral port in addition to the side ports, not like a traditional full sized PP. You probably couldn't get a 13B to run, or at least not well with PP housings and bridgeported irons. You probably could never get enough exhaust port to match it.
Old 02-10-08, 07:22 PM
  #11  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,819
Received 307 Likes on 268 Posts
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Well there's a semi-PP, then there's a PP. With the semi it's just a very small peripheral port in addition to the side ports, not like a traditional full sized PP. You probably couldn't get a 13B to run, or at least not well with PP housings and bridgeported irons. You probably could never get enough exhaust port to match it.
bingo! if you want to run a combination, you'll have to compromise on the size and timing of the peripherals. the main two reasons i see are both for the sake of getting the motor to run right and also, the gross complication of getting/making an intake manifold. however, getting appropriate exhaust, as mentioned earlier, will also become an issue if you're going to try to run full-sized peripherals with the side-ports still functioning.
Old 02-10-08, 07:27 PM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,819
Received 307 Likes on 268 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
If you're asking how to do it...don't.


-Ted
i agree with Ted.
Old 02-11-08, 06:43 PM
  #13  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
There's a few people out there running combo bridge, P-Port's they must have some secret figured out


You must be talking about Judge ITO. He was running a full bridge and semi PP on his drag RX3 (I think). It was a straight runner set-up and made PP numbers to the rear wheels. The thread is over at Nopistons.
Old 02-12-08, 09:48 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
rotaryinspired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He could be talking about people not on this board and who don't want to show off their set ups.
Old 02-12-08, 01:33 PM
  #15  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by t-von
You must be talking about Judge ITO. He was running a full bridge and semi PP on his drag RX3 (I think). It was a straight runner set-up and made PP numbers to the rear wheels. The thread is over at Nopistons.
He is one yes, and to me a P-port is a P-port regardless of size. Combo-port, semi P-port, etc. are all backyard descriptions to a solution. As example, I would say ITO runs a combo-port, you would say he runs a bridge port and a semi p-port. Who is wrong here?

~S~
Old 02-12-08, 02:52 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well there really needs to be a better description than just peripheral port in my oppinion, because that offers no information on the timing, positionning or size of the port. It'd be like calling all side ports simply side ports. Not very informative. See what I mean?

To me a PP means HUGE ports, and if they're something smaller and auxiliary there should be some sort of descriptive adjective associated with them to convey that information.
Old 02-12-08, 03:07 PM
  #17  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's a simple solution "I run small peripheral ports" there you go , trying to say timing should be included goes under the same argument as we've been having.

Combining a P-port and a side port would only make sense to be called a combination port or combi-port. You can't really have a semi p-port if you think about it. It either has a P-port or it doesn't.

~S~
Old 02-12-08, 06:15 PM
  #18  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
He is one yes, and to me a P-port is a P-port regardless of size. Combo-port, semi P-port, etc. are all backyard descriptions to a solution. As example, I would say ITO runs a combo-port, you would say he runs a bridge port and a semi p-port. Who is wrong here?

~S~


No one!
Old 02-12-08, 06:21 PM
  #19  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Well if it were me, I would just call it a bridge PP engine or a half bridge pp engine. I think most in the rotary comunity would know exactly what I meant. If it had regular side ports, then I would just call it a side/pp engine.

That's just my opinion.
Old 02-12-08, 06:29 PM
  #20  
7s before paint!!!

iTrader: (2)
 
13B-RX3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Philly/Texas
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 02-12-08, 10:36 PM
  #21  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (1)
 
ultimatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A p-port is an intake port directly in the side of the rotor housing- regardless of size and timing it's a p-port. A semi-pport is a combination of both the p-port and the normal side ports in the irons. Alot of the top dogs are running this combination because I think it gives the power good low and top end. Most I have seen have a reletively small p-port with a big bridgeport like the semi- p-port Allen posted above.
Old 02-13-08, 09:38 PM
  #22  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
^ Yep that's Judge ITO's work. I think someone in the 20b section maybe trying to duplicate that set-up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danielbradley2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
09-28-15 10:44 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-17-15 09:22 PM
scissorhands
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
09-16-15 01:25 PM



Quick Reply: Can i do a bridge and a peripheral port



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.