ITS N STI

Word, he lives in Deltona. I'll get ahold of him and maybe you guys can do it sometime this week.

GoodfellaFD3S

iTrader: (213)

Like what? The size of the big gulp in the cupholder? The weight of the ******* of the broad in the passenger seat ?

FearNoPiston

iTrader: (17)

how about its an sti goes back to the sti forums?

ITS N STI

I don't really fit in with the local subaru crew.. lol

spoolin spec v

Ive called bs b.c. ive sat in, drove, raced, built, and tuned one 450whp rx-7, and another 550hp rx7 So i know what they are capable of.

I base my comments off experience, not searching goodle for "benching racing power to wheight ratio:

So sorry, for basing my comments of the real life, real deal. but your right, what do i know.

spoolin spec v

I am glad you thought that was funny, b.c. i dont think anyone else will.

spoolin spec v

If its a waste of your time, how about you put some cash on it?

matty

listen "homie" g is a respected member of this board. he isnt gnna type something up to try to impress us. maybe thats what u and the rest of the ls1 trolls do (or setup internet races) but not him. he beat this car. did it make 470rwhp? who knows. however what i am certain of is that it is posible for a fd to beat a fbody even if there is a 100 rwhp difference. the reason is called weight. the subject of horsepower to weight ratio is beaten to death on internt car forums. there is no doubt in my mind that other things matter such as gearing or aero dynamics. HOWEVER they dont matter nearly as much....not even close. Get your head out of your *** and deal. And for the rest of you peeps enough with the torque gearing aero bs. wake up damn it!

please enl;ighten me as to why u would call bs? u dont think the fd in question can make up the 100rwhp difference?

spoolin spec v

Do you know the differnce a 100hp makes in a 1/4 race when talking about MPH?

How about how 100llbs of wheight affects a car?

matty

are u quizing me? lol. grow up. the parameters of the question u asked shows just how much u know.....nothing! u would need to know the wieght of a car to identify the effect of the added 100rwhp genious. i know this 100rwhp means a ton more to a fd then an fbofy in both et and mph.
but i know what u are getting at..i could answer if u would like. if u knew then u would know that 1k lbs means u need 100rwhp, GENERALLY speaking.

spoolin spec v

LOL you cought me. I know nothing of what i am talking about. why cant i be like the fd owners.

matty

why not enlighten us then. so far u have showed us nothing. goodfellas, g myself and the others have shared our logic why not share yours. maybe cause there is no sound logic behind your accusations. or just go away troll.

oo7arkman

iTrader: (2)

I have a good respect for Sti's.... There are so many subaru's where I live it is not even funny... But ppl here actually have a good reason for driving an awd.. Anyways, my point is that I am still running stock sequential turbos at 12.5psi with suppourting mods. I MURDER STi's that are lightly modded (similar to the one you drive), and I have yet to loose to any heavily modded one as well. Another large factor you need to consider is that awd drivetrain has quite abit of power loss. If you want to race an FD and it be a good race, try and find someone with a nearly totally stock FD. Again, not bagging on the STi..I like em... But that is just the truth of the matter...

On LS1's.... I am sitting just over 300whp and although it was close, I can beat SS cameros and Ws6 TA's by about a car. NO hp/wieight isn't the whole calculation. There are many... Driver being the biggest (with the exception of a hwy roll). It sounds like this supercharged TA was maybe closer to the 430-450hp range but all the info we have is what the driver of the TA claimed...

Again G.... Good race..

XxMerlinxX

iTrader: (2)

All off your posts so far have been completely worthless. You haven't posted a shred of information yet, in any thread. You could replace all of your words with, "I'm right! I'm right! I'm right!" and they'd have just as much substance. And you can save whatever clever remark you'd try to come up with, it wouldn't change the fact that you're a troll who's probably never seen an RX-7, much less built one.

ITS N STI

No offense, but I think I'd slaughter a stock FD RX7

GoodfellaFD3S

iTrader: (213)

You would. Stock FDs make around 215 rwhp. There aren't many stock FDs out there though

GoodfellaFD3S

iTrader: (213)

I think you're full of ****.

ITS N STI

I guess I will just PM Kabooski then

oo7arkman

iTrader: (2)

That is why I said nearly stock. Race one with a dp and catback. That should be a pretty close race from a roll. You would take em from a dig if you know how to launch that thing.

ITS N STI

I cut consistent 1.6/low 1.7 60's at the track

spoolin spec v

awesome, if your in the fl area, once we get the new shop up and going, you can swing by, and see, that iam not.

Mr rx-7 tt

iTrader: (5)

Brooks trapped 11.4 @ 120 plus on 362 rwhp on a hot Florida day. The poster is making 10 rwhp more and it's much cooler which means even more power...

Mr rx-7 tt

iTrader: (5)

So how many degrees of port timing did you use on the motors? How did you clearance the rotors on the 550 rwhp RX-7? How much injector and what was the duty cycle?

GoodfellaFD3S

iTrader: (213)

Thanks Chris. I was referring to a bone stock car of course.

I don't think you'll get the answers to your engine building questions either, call me crazy

Mr rx-7 tt

iTrader: (5)

Still waiting Sport...