S2000
#1
Rebuilding the 7
Thread Starter
S2000
I came to the sad realization today.....my car isn't fast enought for me anymore. There were to S2000's in front of me going down the road and they both were messing around then I herd them hit WOT and I was like, what the hell...lets play. The first S2000 was bone stock and I cought up to him but the other had something done, I know he had exhaust but what else???? He just kept on going...I was going about 4000 rpm in 4th when we stopped...he was a little too fast for me. Now I need to do some more work on the car. Dang.
Curtis
Curtis
Trending Topics
#8
Insane Burning Diarrhea
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Weed Wacker
i was tod from a friend of mine who has an s2k that thhey run like a 13.8 in the quarter stock, maybe he's b.s.ing but either way thats pretty quick.
0-60 1/4
2000 Honda S2000 5.5 14.2
2003 Honda S2000 6.3 14.9 (Manual)
2004 Honda S2000 5.8 14.2 (MT Mar '04)
#9
Ready.Set.Gone
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13.8 is feasible...but you are definitely going to have to beat the **** out of it...and be a great driver.
Cmon, SNTP..we know better than to swear by magazine numbers don't we?
Cmon, SNTP..we know better than to swear by magazine numbers don't we?
#11
Tokyo Drift Sellout
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of my friends old 95' Jetta Vr6 inched on a s2k on the freeway, everytime the s2k had to shift the jetta got about a 1/2 a 3/4 of a car then the s2k would gain it back top end and so forth.
The Jetta had the following:
100k plus Vr
cold air intake
autotech chip
autotech exhaust (no cat)
Somethin' to ponder
The Jetta had the following:
100k plus Vr
cold air intake
autotech chip
autotech exhaust (no cat)
Somethin' to ponder
#13
Rotary Freak
Originally Posted by ecyrb | SLC
One of my friends old 95' Jetta Vr6 inched on a s2k on the freeway, everytime the s2k had to shift the jetta got about a 1/2 a 3/4 of a car then the s2k would gain it back top end and so forth.
The Jetta had the following:
100k plus Vr
cold air intake
autotech chip
autotech exhaust (no cat)
Somethin' to ponder
The Jetta had the following:
100k plus Vr
cold air intake
autotech chip
autotech exhaust (no cat)
Somethin' to ponder
On that note, us FD owners with sticky tires and stock rears end up doing the same thing just to prevent blowing out the diff. I seriously doubt it though, specially when those engines are so weak...
Who buys those to mod these days anyways??? Up here its mostly middle aged women trying to hold on to their youth(met one at Dunkin donuts yesterday lol) or the auto cross type.
#19
volk racing
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Fumanchu
The f20 is weak? Last month a shop hit over 500rwhp on a 100% stock engine and went 10.7 in the 1/4 mile. Yup, what a weak motor.
how was it possible to get 500 rwhp on stock internals and no FI?
#20
Originally Posted by jic
wait a minute...i thought f20s were almost maxed out at stock specs.
how was it possible to get 500 rwhp on stock internals and no FI?
how was it possible to get 500 rwhp on stock internals and no FI?
..my brother beat a full bolt on S2000 when his SRT4 was stock. Meh.
EDIT: might be a shitty driver, who knows? still beat it
#21
Belligerent Security
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pulling you over
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A full bolt-on s2000 might have 10-15 more rwhp that stock. Bolt-ons offer nothing to that engine but more noise and a empty wallet. The s2000 you brother raced was probably in the 200-220rwhp range. Nothing special.
Here is a dyno plot for the fastest s2000 in the world I believe. They just landed themselves in the 10's on a stock internal motor. Also, keep in mind this is on stock suspension, no weight reduction and a stock rear end.
Videos: http://www.endlessminds.net/10_second.mpg
http://videos.s2000turbo.com/lovefabjoyride.wmv
Here is a dyno plot for the fastest s2000 in the world I believe. They just landed themselves in the 10's on a stock internal motor. Also, keep in mind this is on stock suspension, no weight reduction and a stock rear end.
Videos: http://www.endlessminds.net/10_second.mpg
http://videos.s2000turbo.com/lovefabjoyride.wmv
Stock Engine (With Optional Equipment)
* AEM EMS
* 3 Bar Map Sensor
* inlinePRO 880 cc Flow-Matched Injectors
* inlinePRO 3mm Turbo Head Gasket
* 35R Ball Bearing Turbo
* AEM EMS
* 3 Bar Map Sensor
* inlinePRO 880 cc Flow-Matched Injectors
* inlinePRO 3mm Turbo Head Gasket
* 35R Ball Bearing Turbo
Last edited by Fumanchu; 03-11-06 at 01:31 AM.
#22
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
no they dont......
0-60 1/4
2000 Honda S2000 5.5 14.2
2003 Honda S2000 6.3 14.9 (Manual)
2004 Honda S2000 5.8 14.2 (MT Mar '04)
0-60 1/4
2000 Honda S2000 5.5 14.2
2003 Honda S2000 6.3 14.9 (Manual)
2004 Honda S2000 5.8 14.2 (MT Mar '04)
#23
pretty sweet fufu, anymore details on that car? btw, how much does it weigh? even though it's a honda, i'd fix them internalzz because it won't last long stock and boosted ...i should know
R.I.P boosted B16, then i got another and said, well, i already have a quote on quote "hot rod" (my fd) sooo i'm going to sell the B16 and drop in my AT D16Y8 (VTEC!!).. i love gas.
R.I.P boosted B16, then i got another and said, well, i already have a quote on quote "hot rod" (my fd) sooo i'm going to sell the B16 and drop in my AT D16Y8 (VTEC!!).. i love gas.
#25
volk racing
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Fumanchu
A stock s2000 weighs around 2800 pounds. If you take the soft-top out, OEM tools, and spare-tire out, you can drop around 100 pounds.