Racing Kills Lounge The RX-7 Club and IB in no way supports or endorses illegal street racing in any way, shape or form, and highly recommends against any illegal activities.

Just got rocked by a new m5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-06, 03:42 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
purerx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,334
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
507 is at the flywheel though my 285 is at the wheels. That diinan m5 iis the older one, I believe the 2006 m5 is a bit quicker.
Old 07-07-06, 03:57 PM
  #27  
Rotary Apprentice

 
NOPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would LOVE to see your 285whp dyno run, rather than your over exaggerated estimates. id be surprised if you were at 230whp.
Old 07-07-06, 06:07 PM
  #28  
von
Rotary Freak

 
von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sandiego, ca
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damn

Sucks that standard luxury cars today come with exotic amounts of horsepower that even all purpose sports cars have a hard time keeping up with.

Almost makes you think sports cars are just a marketing scam made to think your in a hot ride.
Old 07-07-06, 08:33 PM
  #29  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
books's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,731
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
I had nearly the same mods on my old FD with the exception of a high flow cat vs. a midpipe and dynoed 286 SAE corrected (DynoJet) at .75 kg/cm^2 on the PFC
Old 07-07-06, 08:48 PM
  #30  
junkyard turbo

 
dumpsterdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: south bend indiana
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boost is just a measure of intake restriction, so 10 psi through a freer flowing i/c is more airflow than 10 psi through a stocker. imagine blowing 10 psi through a straw, and 10 psi through a garden hose. same pressure outside of the straw, which is what boost measures, but shitloads more air passing through it.

its all about cfm into the motor y0, not how much excess pressure you are creating to get it


boost is a point of reference, nothing more
Old 07-07-06, 08:56 PM
  #31  
Insane Burning Diarrhea

 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i rememebr the old M5's were low 13 second cars... i bet the new M5's are faster.
Old 07-09-06, 01:48 AM
  #32  
Full Member

 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well they say 0-60 or 62 mph in 4.7 seconds... thats not too bad

500hp and 4000 lbs but with great gearin from the 7 speed should equal around mid 12's at i'd say 114mph

C6 vette performance in a big luxo sedan...
Old 07-09-06, 09:49 AM
  #33  
RSPECT

 
Farhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's got an intake, catback, midpipe, downpipe, Power FC, FMIC all @ 11 psi........shouldn't that about equal his estimated 285 rwhp numbers?
Old 07-12-06, 06:32 PM
  #34  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (4)
 
HardHitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: US
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fell into the same thing. I found a brand new M-series Z4 and I raced that thing. Kept up with me basically even but I started pulling away as I began redlining.

Totally underestimated that car. Went online and looked at the specs and found out we are pretty even.

I'm stock with all bolt ons minus ecu and midpipe.

M5, especially the brand new ones, I wouldn't even try lol.
Old 07-13-06, 08:15 PM
  #35  
fd-withdrawal

 
omochi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by purerx7
tell me how these mods arent 285whp at 11psi.
Intake
Downpipe
midpipe
exhaust
intercooler
pfc and tune.
i apparently made 310RWHP with those mods, and my PFC isnt tuned.

apparently b/c ppl are skeptical about the dyno i did my run on.

Last edited by omochi; 07-13-06 at 08:23 PM.
Old 07-14-06, 04:52 AM
  #36  
amp
old yella

iTrader: (50)
 
amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC | PA
Posts: 3,528
Received 97 Likes on 58 Posts
check his signature...

Performance/Exterior:
Rx7store.com DP-Custom 4" Apexi GT SPEC-18" Enkei Aegis Wheels-Blitz SBC ID-Feed Front-10% Tint-Rotary Run Headlights-Vertical Doors-Apexi intake-Polished Intake pipes-HKS ssqv gold-Cwest rear- CF Feed side skirts - CF RE tailight cover - CF garage S Hood - R-MAGIC Fenders

posts were based on this... not the list he came up with after the fact..
Old 07-14-06, 07:17 AM
  #37  
"Sweet Homeee, RX-7!"

 
revv_head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OH god i still remember the day i tried to take on an m5 in my 12A LOL
Old 07-14-06, 10:43 AM
  #38  
He who smokes bitches

 
cool_as_crap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Dorado County
Posts: 3,452
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


ah great, now i have to clean the water i just spat all over my keyboard from laughing so hard.
damnit
Old 07-18-06, 02:31 PM
  #39  
Replaced the Displacement

 
pimpncuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: va
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
well they say 0-60 or 62 mph in 4.7 seconds... thats not too bad
thats the m6 the m5 is quoted at 507 hp and 0-60 in 4.1
Old 07-18-06, 05:20 PM
  #40  
Senior Member

 
greg schroeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For what it's worth I watched the new M5 at the drag strip last Friday. DA was about 6000 ft that evening and it ran 13.7s @ about 107 as I recall. Corrected times for sea level would be around 12.64 @ 115.

I have a DVD video camera, but don't know how to get it into my Pentium 111 450. Oh well.
Old 07-18-06, 05:40 PM
  #41  
Senior Member

 
greg schroeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 21K95RX7
bingo!!! correct me if im wrong but an intercooler doesn't add hp it just allows you to run more boost which in turn makes hp. so if someone is running 10psi on a stock intercooler and they switch to v-mount or greddy 2 or 3 row ect. and still run stock boost they aren't going to add hp is that correct?
The stock intercooler with alike intake temps will be faster with stock boost, but stock will heat soak sooner than aftermarket larger intercooler if you make pass after pass. Stock intercooler will have less lag as the turbos don't need to fill and compress the larger volume of the aftermarket intercooler and over volume duct work. It's not hard to sit on a dyno and knock off a few pulls on a stock intercooler and loose power then compare to a larger intercooler that sustains cooler temps better, but it's not going to win the first rolling punch.

On a rotary club drive I raced another FD on the freeway which had just had 25,000 of parts and labor stuffed into it with a single turbo, full exhaust, Power FC, intake, large front mount intercooler, etc. The driver of the car was a mechanic from the shop. I was running a down pipe and K & N air filter with modified stock intake set up to improve forced induction. I beat the other car repeatedly, both cars 10 psi.

After grinding stock interior exhaust welds of the stock cat flush and adding the cat back and Power FC to DP and modified stock air box I beat a street port, Power FC 15 psi, full exhaust, fuel system, larger injectors, single turbo three times badly. As far as I can tell around here most of the mods built to make dyno power suck for street racing from digs and slower speed rolling puches.

After adding a mid pipe and fuel pump and a bit of weight reduction to the above I beat the Stage 4 996tt in a rolling punch, all with stock intercooler.

Last edited by greg schroeder; 07-18-06 at 05:51 PM.
Old 07-18-06, 07:29 PM
  #42  
Senior Member

 
21K95RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Balt. MD
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by greg schroeder
The stock intercooler with alike intake temps will be faster with stock boost, but stock will heat soak sooner than aftermarket larger intercooler if you make pass after pass. Stock intercooler will have less lag as the turbos don't need to fill and compress the larger volume of the aftermarket intercooler and over volume duct work. It's not hard to sit on a dyno and knock off a few pulls on a stock intercooler and loose power then compare to a larger intercooler that sustains cooler temps better, but it's not going to win the first rolling punch.

On a rotary club drive I raced another FD on the freeway which had just had 25,000 of parts and labor stuffed into it with a single turbo, full exhaust, Power FC, intake, large front mount intercooler, etc. The driver of the car was a mechanic from the shop. I was running a down pipe and K & N air filter with modified stock intake set up to improve forced induction. I beat the other car repeatedly, both cars 10 psi.

After grinding stock interior exhaust welds of the stock cat flush and adding the cat back and Power FC to DP and modified stock air box I beat a street port, Power FC 15 psi, full exhaust, fuel system, larger injectors, single turbo three times badly. As far as I can tell around here most of the mods built to make dyno power suck for street racing from digs and slower speed rolling puches.

After adding a mid pipe and fuel pump and a bit of weight reduction to the above I beat the Stage 4 996tt in a rolling punch, all with stock intercooler.
how much hp was that 996tt putting out??? also, what your saying is if your running stock boost a bigger intercooler isn't going to do anything???
Old 07-18-06, 08:13 PM
  #43  
Senior Member

 
Henessey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: va
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rode in the back seat of a new m5 a few months ago.... well... it aint slow.
Old 07-18-06, 09:32 PM
  #44  
Full Member

 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep like i said, C6 vette performance in a luxo sedan
Old 07-19-06, 02:31 PM
  #45  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
SlingShotRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: DC
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Juiceh
A better Intercooler can further reduce intake temps which will in turn produce more power as well.

Theres a Dinan M5 I've seen on the way to work almost every day of the last couple weeks. He's always going heavy on the throttle, and that thing sounds mean. I can't wait till I get my car back from A-spec and I see that guy on the street. Its gonna be on! I'm gonna try to get it on video too.

I'll be pushing well over your ~285 HP so it should be much more interesting.
Becareful with that E39 Dinan M5.

If its a regular Dinan it has like CAI, Headers, Xpipe, Exhaust, reflashed ECU
and some minor suspension upgrades..

Now if its a Dinan S2, a E39 M5, with all the above mods. but with a
Intercooled Supercharged and some more aggressive ECU tunining.
It can have up to 600hp..

ask around in @ www.m5board.com. Very likely that M5 is on the forum.
Old 07-19-06, 10:03 PM
  #46  
Senior Member

 
Henessey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: va
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ the old m5s look like any other 5.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
10-01-15 07:58 PM



Quick Reply: Just got rocked by a new m5



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.