Racing Kills Lounge The RX-7 Club and IB in no way supports or endorses illegal street racing in any way, shape or form, and highly recommends against any illegal activities.

[vid] single turbo RX7 vs modded Subaru STi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-06, 06:46 AM
  #1  
manned by boarderators

Thread Starter
 
vhalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[vid] single turbo RX7 vs modded Subaru STi

http://vhalin.com/vids/stivsrx71.wmv





2 of the best sounding cars around IMO
Old 09-13-06, 07:54 AM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
radkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow, thems some stupid people standing there.
Old 09-13-06, 10:33 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
total pwnage!
Old 09-13-06, 12:28 PM
  #4  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
wow that was pretty bad
Old 09-13-06, 12:32 PM
  #5  
teehee

 
rajahFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Monterey Bay
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so i guess you're not coming..

nice run though.
Old 09-13-06, 02:16 PM
  #6  
resU deretsigeR

iTrader: (3)
 
jkimbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yep
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor sti.
Old 09-13-06, 04:46 PM
  #7  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sti obviously cant drive (well launch) you know i see so many people who buy awd cars thinking well now i have the advantage and i will win, not realizing it is way different launching an awd compared to fwd or rwd
Old 09-13-06, 05:17 PM
  #8  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cosmo_TT
sti obviously cant drive (well launch) you know i see so many people who buy awd cars thinking well now i have the advantage and i will win, not realizing it is way different launching an awd compared to fwd or rwd
The problem is that AWD cars are not built for drag racing, they're built for rally's and such. For dragging in an AWD, you need hella sticky tires. Once you can actually get them to stick, then you have to worry about the tranny breaking. AWD's are great if you're being sponsored or are just rich, but don't plan on your tranny lasting long.
Old 09-13-06, 05:40 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ehh, my evo lasted through a good deal. cutting a launch like a 1.6 60 ft like i regularly did was death for most cars. if by accident you spin all four wheels, your still accelerating like hell.
Old 09-13-06, 06:15 PM
  #10  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,846
Received 787 Likes on 463 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
The problem is that AWD cars are not built for drag racing, they're built for rally's and such. For dragging in an AWD, you need hella sticky tires. Once you can actually get them to stick, then you have to worry about the tranny breaking. AWD's are great if you're being sponsored or are just rich, but don't plan on your tranny lasting long.

ok I am no means a traction expert here but your post does not make sense to me. AWD gives you way more traction off the line. That's why the evo and such claim 0-60 in 4.9 (no traction issues).

If I am mistaken, please educate with some facts not opinions.

M-
Old 09-13-06, 11:23 PM
  #11  
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
eriksseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,137
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by montego
ok I am no means a traction expert here but your post does not make sense to me. AWD gives you way more traction off the line. That's why the evo and such claim 0-60 in 4.9 (no traction issues).

If I am mistaken, please educate with some facts not opinions.

M-
That's also why the FD and such claim a 0-60 in 4.9?
Old 09-14-06, 02:06 AM
  #12  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by montego
ok I am no means a traction expert here but your post does not make sense to me. AWD gives you way more traction off the line. That's why the evo and such claim 0-60 in 4.9 (no traction issues).

If I am mistaken, please educate with some facts not opinions.

M-
If you don't launch properly, even in an AWD, you can spin tires. Once you do get your launches down, or you get slicks or something close to it, then you're putting more stress on the drivetrain. You think that if you have an AWD car all you have to do is dump the clutch? Not quite. Especially once you start modding the car.
Old 09-14-06, 07:17 AM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
If you don't launch properly, even in an AWD, you can spin tires. Once you do get your launches down, or you get slicks or something close to it, then you're putting more stress on the drivetrain. You think that if you have an AWD car all you have to do is dump the clutch? Not quite. Especially once you start modding the car.
dude, have you ever driven an awd car? when you spin you are still gripping and accelerationg like a bat out of hell... its not like FWD or RWD where you dont move much. In fact, i cut my best 60' times while spinning all fours in my evo (1.69).
Old 09-14-06, 01:51 PM
  #14  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,846
Received 787 Likes on 463 Posts
Originally Posted by eriksseven
That's also why the FD and such claim a 0-60 in 4.9?
Weight bro. Just to clarify I was talking about the EV0 VIII with 276 Base HP.

In comparison to an FD: it has 20 more HP and 600 lbs more in weight. And actually does 0-60 in 4.8 not 4.9 (I was mistaken). Now don't forget that AWD has huge drivetrain loss and thus the EVO dynoes close to 230-235 to wheels a healthy fd is about 225-230 RWHP. That all wheel drive system sure makes up for that extra weight off the line.
Old 09-14-06, 03:28 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=montego]Now don't forget that AWD has huge drivetrain loss and thus the EVO dynoes close to 230-235 to wheels QUOTE]
evo is a bit less than that. more like 215whp.
Old 09-16-06, 12:03 AM
  #16  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rt turbo
dude, have you ever driven an awd car? when you spin you are still gripping and accelerationg like a bat out of hell... its not like FWD or RWD where you dont move much. In fact, i cut my best 60' times while spinning all fours in my evo (1.69).
You're missing my point, but I probably should've clarified. I know that AWD launches better, everyone knows that. My point was that the transmission (stock) will break sooner BECAUSE it's an AWD car being dragged. AWD cars drivetrains have more stress put on them. And once more, most people who drag AWD cars, aren't normally getting all that power to the ground in the first place. That doesn't mean that they're slow, it just means they're not as fast as they could be. Once they do reach that level, that's where things really start to break. Saw it happen on a friend of mine's Evo. Stock tranny couldn't handle it and hung itself at the line next to a blown C5.
Old 09-16-06, 09:21 AM
  #17  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
AWD-RWD racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
The problem is that AWD cars are not built for drag racing, they're built for rally's and such. For dragging in an AWD, you need hella sticky tires. Once you can actually get them to stick, then you have to worry about the tranny breaking. AWD's are great if you're being sponsored or are just rich, but don't plan on your tranny lasting long.


really??? can you better explain that to me and my 3000lb under 300whp 12.222 @ 107 mph subaru? although I have broken 2nd gear twice, it was never during racing or dragging
Old 09-16-06, 09:40 AM
  #18  
JDM > USDM

 
BlkS5TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How are they not as fast as they could be? If anything they are faster than they should be. What other cars can break 12's with <105mph traps and street tires? Not to mention the advantage they have with less than perfect track conditions.

Sure, there's a little more strain on the transmission, but that could be said for any car that's cutting a <2.00 60' on a regular basis.
Old 09-16-06, 05:55 PM
  #19  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Breaking traction = slower
Full traction = better launch
Better launch = more strain on drivetrain
More strain on drivetrain = drivetrain death.

I can't put it any plainer than that. Nowhere in all of that did I say that AWD's couldn't launch or were slow in comparison.
Old 09-16-06, 06:18 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
rt turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Breaking traction = slower
Full traction = better launch
Better launch = more strain on drivetrain
More strain on drivetrain = drivetrain death.

I can't put it any plainer than that. Nowhere in all of that did I say that AWD's couldn't launch or were slow in comparison.
not that evos havent broken their trannys... but mine lasted many many 11 second runs.
Old 09-16-06, 06:49 PM
  #21  
Come get you some!!

 
IndyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Band with exceeded.
Old 09-16-06, 08:20 PM
  #22  
teehee

 
rajahFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Monterey Bay
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
Band with exceeded.


OWNED.
Old 09-25-06, 06:05 AM
  #23  
manned by boarderators

Thread Starter
 
vhalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNSkH4OAlaM <<< working link of video... mod can you edit my post and put this url in there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 04:48 PM



Quick Reply: [vid] single turbo RX7 vs modded Subaru STi



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.