Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

v6 conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #1  
babyd011_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Delta, BC
v6 conversion

basicly from an injury im in too much pain to drive stick and i considered doing a tranny swap to auto, but then figured when if im gonna do a trany swap, why not a whole piston conversion.
i owned a v8 before (bought with the swap already done) and the set up was very powerful. i think i would like to tone it down with a v6 and a 200r4 auto tranny.

can anyone here comment on questions such as the average cost of converting?
hours spent into the swap?
does grannys really cover all the bases? or are there hidden things they dont comment on cause theyre all about selling their kits?
i remember the v8 i had was having an issue with the master cylander leaking and i was told its cause the stock item isnt compatible with the power, is this a common issue?

what are peoples experiences/comments with doing a v6 swap? or swaps in general? .....
hope you guys can give me some good valuable info, tips, tricks, anything.....
thanks!!
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #2  
gnx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 26
From: San Francisco, CA
If it isn't a turbo V6 IMO it won't be worth the effort. You could always put in a stock '87-93 Ford 5.0/AOD setup. That is like a healthy V6
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #3  
FCdemon's Avatar
3rd gen junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: san diego
ford's 4.6 is a beefy V6...
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #4  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by FCdemon
ford's 4.6 is a beefy V6...
What?
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 04:00 PM
  #5  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
I think he means 3.8
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #6  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by Nihilanthic
I think he means 3.8
Then he should be talking about Buick.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
Then he should be talking about Buick.
Heh, that's what I thought when I saw the screen name "gnx7."
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #8  
FCdemon's Avatar
3rd gen junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: san diego
dang, I meant 4.0 sorry
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #9  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by FCdemon
dang, I meant 4.0 sorry
...the SOHC ranger motor?

yeah.. it's a... beast...
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #10  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
To benchpress?

BTW Ford DOES TOO make a 3.8 v6!
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #11  
bigj50's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: san leandro(SF BAY)
what about a one of those chevy vortec V6's????
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #12  
TransAmwonderland's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Nihilanthic
To benchpress?

BTW Ford DOES TOO make a 3.8 v6!
I think in the old early 80s thunderbirds. I think they where TBI injected too.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Insane Burning Diarrhea
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
RB26 or 2jz?
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #14  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by Nihilanthic
To benchpress?

BTW Ford DOES TOO make a 3.8 v6!

And it's a turdbox just like the 4.0l. So, if you're talking 3.8l, it's either Buick or *nothing*. Sure Ford raced the 3.8 in the BGN series, but to get an engine that didn't suck hardcore, they completely re-engineered it to the point that nothing from one will fit the other.

The 4.0l SOHC is a total nightmare. They use the same head on both sides of the block, so the timing chain for one side is on the back of the engine. And if you remove the heads before first removing the main caps, the block distorts permanently. We treat these as disposable engines, since for the amount of labor required to do any major work on one, you might as well just pop in a reman and be done with it.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #15  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
RB26 or 2jz?
Wow, you just named the only two common modern-day Japanese six-cylinders that aren't V6s. Congratulations
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #16  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by TransAmwonderland
I think in the old early 80s thunderbirds. I think they where TBI injected too.
And in pre'96 Taurus/Sable, all Windstars, pre-V8 front wheel drive Continentals, V6 mustangs through the end of the SN95s...

A 4.2l version of same replaced the 300ci "big block six" in trucks.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #17  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by peejay
And it's a turdbox just like the 4.0l.
Sure it may be, but I bet nothing is as much a turdbox as the 2.9... That thing sucked almost as much as my Metro's 1.0.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #18  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
At least you can get performance parts for the 2.9!

SCCA ClubRally used to have a "Group 2" class that had certain multipliers such that a pushrod engine could be up to 3000cc, a 2-valve OHC could be 2.4l, and a 4-valve OHC could be 2000cc. One builder posited heavily that for the most power, it would make sense to take the 2.9 and give it a slight overbore to meet the limit of the rules, and build it up with *readily available* goodies.

But then, for the conditions, there's really no point to more than 200-250hp in a 2WD car, so it was always easier to just build up a 2-liter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
44
Nov 5, 2019 11:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.