Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

Supra7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-06, 03:48 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ledfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Newark, CA, USA
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Supra7

http://www.turbomagazine.com/feature...ra_mazda_rx_7/
Old 08-14-06, 03:56 AM
  #2  
From Start 2 Finish

 
WNT2CREALPAIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Motown
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Such a repost.

What a waste of a nice looking fd.

I hate supras and any motor other than a rotary in a rx7.

Last edited by WNT2CREALPAIN; 08-14-06 at 03:59 AM.
Old 08-14-06, 04:01 AM
  #3  
RX7club addict

iTrader: (5)
 
prescription 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: El paso, TX
Posts: 343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crazy...
Old 08-14-06, 07:26 AM
  #4  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
All that fabrication and they couldn't make a hood fit?
Old 08-14-06, 08:11 AM
  #5  
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
purerx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,334
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by WNT2CREALPAIN
Such a repost.

What a waste of a nice looking fd.

I hate supras and any motor other than a rotary in a rx7.
that has to be the most ignorant statement I have ever heard, the mkiv supra engine is one of the best engines ever built, although heavy it can easily support 550whp on stock internals.
Old 08-14-06, 08:24 AM
  #6  
DIGG7ER

iTrader: (4)
 
rizzxx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: virginia beach, va.
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by purerx7
that has to be the most ignorant statement I have ever heard, the mkiv supra engine is one of the best engines ever built, although heavy it can easily support 550whp on stock internals.
550? my friend has 780 to the wheels with 140,000 miles on the motor. He drives to the track and drives his car home. I wish I can do that to my 7. Those motors are amazing.
Old 08-14-06, 08:38 AM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
DrunkenBowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: STL Area
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rizzxx7
550? my friend has 780 to the wheels with 140,000 miles on the motor. He drives to the track and drives his car home. I wish I can do that to my 7. Those motors are amazing.

Exactly. The 2JZ motor is probably the greatest motor ever built. The japanese got one thing right.
Old 08-14-06, 08:54 AM
  #8  
Cheese

 
F0RSAKEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive seen dyno pulls over 900whp on stock internals. Preference does not matter, it IS a great engine. Period.
Old 08-14-06, 10:23 AM
  #9  
Zoom, Zoom...Redifined

 
canadaisintexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool swap, but i believe the 2JZ GTE especially with those 2 monster hairdryers is going to weigh a fair bit more than the 13B-REW (i could be wrong, correct me please).

Its a pity really because its a cool swap, still good for goin fast in a straight line though.

Rob
Old 08-14-06, 11:06 AM
  #10  
RX[SE7EN]
 
SpiritRX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it obviously would, but that's why they chose the RX7 body
Old 08-14-06, 11:38 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WNT2CREALPAIN
I hate supras and any motor other than a rotary in a rx7.
Next time you post, pull your head out of your *** for a second to see which forum you are in. There is a reason this is called "Other Engine Conversions" and not "********** the Wankel."

I like the 2JZ but the weight is a bit much for a chassis like the FD. That's why my next project is going to be a 4g63. The 4g63 is like the 2JZ of 4-cylinders. The lighter engine, I think, would be a better match in the lighter RX-7 chassis. Plus, while you can't make as much power on stock internals as the 2JZ, you can make obscene, dangerous amounts of power with the engine.

Still, like others have already said, it's a great engine. It looks pretty damn good in that car, too.
Old 08-14-06, 11:42 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gardena
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hahhahah
Old 08-14-06, 03:33 PM
  #13  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by rarson
Next time you post, pull your head out of your *** for a second to see which forum you are in. There is a reason this is called "Other Engine Conversions" and not "********** the Wankel.".
I agree with the eh....essence...of your post. But in fairness, I think this started out in the 3rd gen. section and got moved.
Old 08-14-06, 05:18 PM
  #14  
moon ******

 
Nihilanthic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hes wankeling off in
Old 08-14-06, 09:02 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that there have been a lot of these "It's sacrilige to put a non-rotary engine into an RX-7" in this subforum lately. As if the point of this forum was to eradicate all ideas of any possible non-rotor engine swaps. It's annoying to the people who are here to discuss other interesting engine swaps.

I think a straight-six swap would be a better option if the engine in question had an aluminum block. Especially in a turbo application, with the extra weight of accompanying components, I know personally I would prefer a lighter alternative. But then again, the 2JZ is such a great engine and there's so many parts for it.

And if I'm running a 3.0L six-cylinder, I'd rather use a single turbo setup instead of twins. I mention this because the VQ35 seems like it could be a decent alternative, but with a turbocharged setup, I'd have to go with twins for efficiency. But like I said, I'd rather use one big snail instead of two. Maybe a supercharged VQ35 would be a good way to go?
Old 08-17-06, 10:04 PM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
how many rx7s run in the 6s? good...

how many supras run in the 6s? great

which one weight less? excelent

which one looks more exotic and sexier? get my point?




1000hp with a rotary 50grand(ported single 20B)
1000hp with a 2jz 25 grand(titan motorsports job)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbotim
Build Threads
38
11-09-13 01:37 PM
pimpin_2jz
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
1
10-08-04 04:57 AM
Cory Simpson
Rotary Car Performance
12
09-30-03 03:22 PM
Cory Simpson
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
23
09-21-03 07:59 PM
Rx_treme
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
93
02-27-03 01:50 AM



Quick Reply: Supra7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.