Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

FC + SVX flat 6 and BLOWER..........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #1  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
FC + SVX flat 6 and BLOWER..........

That's right, an FC with the subaru 6 cylinder SVX engine and a little belt driven boost, man I want to try this swap just for the head shaking 'holy ****' factor and smooooooth torque delivery.

The LS1 is so standard now, even though it works so well. It doesn't even need anything like a blower to make it rock, where's the challenge in that?



It might be possible to steal the entire drivetrain and make it AWD, lol.

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:58 AM
  #2  
NoRotor10AE's Avatar
10AE LS1 Swap In Progress
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
what are the stats / dimensions / weights on that thing?


it looks like it would be a lil wide, but would be able to sit pretty low...
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 01:32 AM
  #3  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
You can fit a Lincoln dohc 4.6 v8 in an FC engine bay, a subaru pancake motor might fit but I haven't checked its dimensions yet. But yeah, SVX engines are cheap as dirt, we're talking $500 for less than 100k miles, ECU and all (not that I'd keep it, heh).
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 03:20 AM
  #4  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
The arguement might have been made in the 50s, why start with a small block Chevy when my flat head Ford will make the same power when I add a blower?


Suby motor is 220hp? Ford 302 (or SBC, LS1, etc) will beat it for HP and torque with a much easier installation. Aftermarket stuff for flat 6 Suby ---->0. Aftermarket stuff for 302 (or SBC, LS1, etc)----00 (infinity).

High volume = lower cost.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 05:33 AM
  #5  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
You can make a 302 make 400 hp all natural with a set of AFR heads, a real intake (most intakes have intake runners that are too long and thus restrict high rpm torque and power) and tube headers... on the *STOCK* Cam. Stroke it to 347 and you have... 450~ hp, all natural. LS1s have made 400 and over N/A to the *WHEELS* with minor mods at stock displacement levels, and you can re-sleeve it or stroke it out to make it displace more. :P

Also, I have no idea how much the bottom end of that H6 can take, and where you could find stronger cranks/rods/pistons for it. Im also pretty sure the aftermarket for cams and heads are nonexistant :P Get a 2.5 H4 and get a bore or stroke to 2.6, and there ya go. Same displacement as the rotary, just as smooth, much more thermodynamic efficiency, and probably more aftermarket because the WRX finally made it to our shores
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #6  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Trust me Jeff. The "Challenge" is not all its cracked up to be. The fact that you could turn the LS1 drivetrain swap around over a 3 day weekend is a good thing. Having your car sit on stands for 10 months while you fabricate is not.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
LOL that reminds me - accessories such as P/S, A/C, the steering rack, bumpsteer, etc, all that **** is very well supported and there are people to ask at torquecentral with these swaps. Ive gone without AC for a LONG ******* time and having it working is ******* nice. Holy **** you have no idea how good it is until you deal with some 100 degree days without it and get USED TO IT, then go back to AC. DAMN.

Plus you can make a ton of power easy as hell with a ford sbc or a chevy sbc/lt1/ls1 :P
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Yeah I think I'll stick with LS power if I ever finally give up on rotaries. I'm getting close to firing up my screw charged 6 port for the first time and it might seduce me away from pistons, or it might pop.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #9  
astrochild7's Avatar
controlled kaos
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 908
Likes: 1
From: eugene, or
dude stick with what you know... your engine is still running for some reason...
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #10  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Yes my latest port revision is taking some real abuse without anything going wrong. One stretch of road where I used to take it up to 130 is where it always popped a side seal at the top of 4th at 7500 rpm, but it takes it fine now. It idles damn near rock solid without the BACV on a rough megasquirt tune (I ditched the stock ECU).

You must drive the beast once it's tamed, I'm excited yet afraid.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #11  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
The subaru boxer motors are too wide to fit, I've already thought about that.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
kriswrx's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: austin, tx
3.3 v6.....the motor is not worth the effort...even if it dirt cheap.....cool idea tho.....but hes not goin anywhere fast
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #13  
R.P.M.'s Avatar
Likes to swear....alot
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener Ontario Canada
The WRX motor will fit...I've measured it......infact I'm thinkin of doing the EJ20 swap again.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
owen is fat's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by wingsfan
The "Challenge" is not all its cracked up to be. The fact that you could turn the LS1 drivetrain swap around over a 3 day weekend is a good thing. Having your car sit on stands for 10 months while you fabricate is not.
AGREED!!!!!!!
dont let the ''theory'' of the project get in your way. build an LS1FC and you wont be asking questions, you'll be out driving the hell out of it and almost scaring yourself silly.
seriously, these cars are freakin' NUTS!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #15  
Herbie555's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by rotoryrocket1
The WRX motor will fit...I've measured it......infact I'm thinkin of doing the EJ20 swap again.
You sure about that? Unless there's a TON more width available in an FC versus an FD, I didn't think it would fit.

Don't get me wrong, I think it would be excellent.

I've been trying to figure out if I could cram an EJ20 into an FD for quite a while now, but I recently came to the conclusion that the motors were just *too*darn*wide*

The upside of the boxers is that they're short (lengthwise) and short (heightwise), and pretty light, but they are *very* wide for a 4...

If you've got hard data on the width of the bay between the shock towers and at the lower suspension pickup points, I'd love to see it. Most of what data I have I've had to infer from stuff I can find on the web, or interpolate from the dimensions of the 13b, etc. I stopped short of buying an FD just to take measurements on!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:52 AM
  #16  
rarson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally Posted by kriswrx
3.3 v6.....the motor is not worth the effort...even if it dirt cheap.....cool idea tho.....but hes not goin anywhere fast

Subaru doesn't make V engines.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:12 AM
  #17  
fcdrifter13's Avatar
Play Well
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
ohh ohh i have an idea. A volkswagen motor. like the olds ones in the bugs ive seen them make 400hp and be driven everyday. hes what you do starout with a 1600cc motor stroke it and bore it to 2500cc. and you got like 200hp there put a twin turbo on it and bam a light good on gas cheap motor. these bug motors are so cheap its not even funny you can buy a pinched out motor for as much as a rotory rebuild. but you know thats just my .02
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 12:21 AM
  #18  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by fcdrifter13
ohh ohh i have an idea. A volkswagen motor. like the olds ones in the bugs ive seen them make 400hp and be driven everyday. hes what you do starout with a 1600cc motor stroke it and bore it to 2500cc. and you got like 200hp there put a twin turbo on it and bam a light good on gas cheap motor. these bug motors are so cheap its not even funny you can buy a pinched out motor for as much as a rotory rebuild. but you know thats just my .02
400 HP bug motors might last a few months. Seriously. There is nothing cheap about them either.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #19  
Herbie555's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by turbojeff
400 HP bug motors might last a few months. Seriously. There is nothing cheap about them either.
They're also not all that much smaller than the Subaru boxers. The Aircooled ones are a *bit* narrower, but not tons narrower. The "wasserboxer" watercooled engines from the Vanagons, etc. are pretty much the same size as the Subaru EJ series, which is why the old 2.2L Legacy motors make such a great swap into the Vanagon: Same size, nearly double the horsepower, and WAY more reliable.

I guess what I mean to say is, neither boxer will likely fit, though if it COULD be made to fit, the modern Subaru engine would last quite a bit longer than a built-to-the-hilt vw motor...

Last edited by Herbie555; Aug 22, 2005 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #20  
GDJ
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Oh man now I want to do a VW Bus with a WRX engine! Wouldn't that be fun!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 07:02 PM
  #21  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
I used to own an SVX and thought the motor was fantastic. It has a ton of low end grunt and sounds more exotic than a porsche flat 6 at high rpm. It sounds NOTHING like any other Subaru I've heard. I think it would be tough to fit that into an rx7 engine bay because, due to the horizontal layout, it is very wide.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Mankdrake 2661
General Rotary Tech Support
0
Sep 23, 2015 12:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.