Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-06, 03:26 PM
  #1  
7th Heaven

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
engine swap

i like my t2, but it gets horrible gas mileage and have no torque
so im thinking of putting in a 5.9 cummins.
any tips?
Old 10-09-06, 04:13 PM
  #2  
new paint

 
DC13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durham,NC
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and how could this work?
Old 10-09-06, 07:32 PM
  #3  
7th Heaven

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i think it would be the most unique thing ever done.
besides, i could take off in overdrive uphill better than a rx7 can in 1st...

then ill take the hatch glass off and put a gooseneck on the middle
Old 10-09-06, 08:30 PM
  #4  
moon ******

 
Nihilanthic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hes hoping someone might laugh at the same old joke? lol.
Old 10-09-06, 09:52 PM
  #5  
7th Heaven

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I thought it might be pretty interesting.
The only problem would be the weight over the front wheels.
But I think for the reliability, gasmileage, and performance...
a used cummins engine can be find for around 2k, and thats with the injector pump...
Old 10-13-06, 06:04 PM
  #6  
moon ******

 
Nihilanthic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Youd need a longer final-drive gear to use a diesels powerband unless you have crazy transmission ratios.

Well, that and if you wanna go diesel go find some expensive aluminum audi ****.
Old 10-14-06, 01:50 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
theantirotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is a good idea. so have you done any research on how to actually get this done? no duobt the car would be better off with the cummins.
Old 10-14-06, 02:03 PM
  #8  
slo
registered user

iTrader: (1)
 
slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A cummins 6.7 weighs 830+ pounds. If I'm not mistaken, which I might be the 5.9 is the same block as the 6.7, but with cast iron instead of alluminum heads.

Thats without the trans, which would also be very heavy. But on the positie side A fully built cummins can make 900 HP and 1600+ trq. My co worker has a 5.9 powered truck and claims to get around 15 MPG no matter how much weight the truck is loaded down with.
Old 10-14-06, 03:28 PM
  #9  
yes,thats me \/

iTrader: (1)
 
cdaleracer669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my friends cummins gets 19mpg on the highway.. it would be cool but it would make the car extremely heavy, i read a longblock cummins 5.9 weighs 1000lbs
Old 10-14-06, 03:39 PM
  #10  
slo
registered user

iTrader: (1)
 
slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
15MPG was average.

1000 LBS for a 5.9 sounds right. Add in at allot of weight for the trans.



you'll kill the handling
Old 10-15-06, 06:18 PM
  #11  
new paint

 
DC13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durham,NC
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most definatly on the weight, u would get good milage considering the car would still be alot lighter then the truck and alot more aerodynamic
Old 10-15-06, 06:56 PM
  #12  
Rotary Apprentice

 
NOPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slpin
i like my t2, but it gets horrible gas mileage and have no torque
so im thinking of putting in a 5.9 cummins.
any tips?
lolololololol
Old 10-17-06, 07:10 PM
  #13  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (10)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,085
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
I would take the 5.9 and make it into a trike like Jesse James did with the 18 wheeler cab.

5.9 Cummins is 1,000lbs.... When you braked I think you could get the rear wheels off the ground..... he he he

Maybe you should look at the 4BT which is a 4 cylinder Cummins and only about 750lbs .

Or get an LS1/T56 and get 25mpg+ on the highway and be able to run 10's, 11's, 12's and retain the 50/50 weight balance.

-MC
Old 10-18-06, 02:25 PM
  #14  
PBB
Junior Member

 
PBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be sure to use an 800 pound transmission to handle all that torque: http://www.ttcautomotive.com/English/products/PS13.asp
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
maikelc
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
08-24-15 11:04 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: engine swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.