Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

Chevy Direct injection v-6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #1  
iamsisyphus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Surry, NH
Chevy Direct injection v-6

Any thoughts on transplanting this motor? I have an 89 convertible and could sure use 312 horsepower with low end torque. Not to mention the gas mileage would be around 30.

Doug
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 01:12 PM
  #2  
MK3Brent's Avatar
I'm only asking questions
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 498
Likes: 23
From: Greensboro, North Carolina
What kind of thoughts are you looking for?
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 07:16 AM
  #3  
iamsisyphus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Surry, NH
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
What kind of thoughts are you looking for?
I know there aren't any kits yet, but would it be technically much different from an LS1 swap? What would the trade offs be? The usual.
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 07:34 AM
  #4  
sunburn's Avatar
Mother****ing Wow
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: NJ
The LS swap is well documented and would prob be easier on your wallet.

I hear reports of 28-30mph on the hwy in swapped FC/FD
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
MK3Brent's Avatar
I'm only asking questions
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 498
Likes: 23
From: Greensboro, North Carolina
Originally Posted by sunburn
I hear reports of 28-30mph on the hwy in swapped FC/FD
That's why I went with the 2J... 190mph+!

Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #6  
sunburn's Avatar
Mother****ing Wow
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
That's why I went with the 2J... 190mph+!

FYI

this mileage is pretty well documented... it's all bout how you drive -NOT the engine.
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Not really a great fit, but I'm sure it could be done. Engine control and fueling are going to be challenging.

A 5.3L LS will get about the same milage, same or more power, and is a lot cheaper/easier to do.
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #8  
MK3Brent's Avatar
I'm only asking questions
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 498
Likes: 23
From: Greensboro, North Carolina
Originally Posted by sunburn
FYI

this mileage is pretty well documented... it's all bout how you drive -NOT the engine.
Sorry, I was poking fun at the MPH vs. MPG.
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 460
From: cold
The stock GM ECU will probably freak out because it is missing so many inputs data bus inputs
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2011 | 06:48 AM
  #10  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
Originally Posted by arghx
The stock GM ECU will probably freak out because it is missing so many inputs data bus inputs
All of that can be removed during tuning.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
Oct 6, 2015 12:28 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Oct 2, 2015 07:56 PM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
jarjarbinks
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 25, 2015 11:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.