Old School and Other Rotary Old School and Other Rotary Powered Vehicles including performance modifications and technical support

bridge port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #26  
Eric Happy Meal's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach
Originally Posted by ArmyOfOne
On my setup I made sure to use 2.25 inch SS tubing and elbows with a 3mm wall thickness. It collects into a single 2.25" 22" long, through a Saab turbo muffler then over the diff into a RB Road race muffler. This is an all motor full 6 port BP with the regular RB carb filter. The thicker tubing made a world of difference.
i think i might end up going with that, since im also using a bridged 6 port. and the racing beat 48 dhla. how restrictive is the 2.25 inch for it?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #27  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
There are three ways I know of to make good power with a bridgeport. A long primary system... a short primary system... and forced induction.
Long primary systems have a broader powerband, but are not very tolerant of muffling. Short primary systems have a narrower powerband and are slightly more tolerant of muffling. You should not put mufflers anywhere in piping until after collecting the primaries or the tunning will be destroyed. The mufflers should also be placed a reasonable distance away from the collection point. Racing Beat has some good info on the specs for these systems in their catalog. It is a shame that they do not make any systems that match their specs. If you are going to run a bridgeport on the street the only system that has a chance of making power and being somewhat quiet is the short primary.
Forced induction like a supercharger throws everthing out the window though. It can make life easier because it pretty much eliminates the need for tuned exhaust scavenging. The positive intake pressure is always there so you don't need timed low pressure pulses to scavange the chamber durring overlap. The pressure just blows it clear.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 06:27 PM
  #28  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 25
From: Socal
Since we're talking about exhaust, there have been several discussions (not in the forum) on which one is better for a dual pipes into 1 muffler.

1. Collector before the axle.
2. Collector above the axle.
3. Under the axle set-ups.

I have personally tried both 1 & 2 but I cant tell the difference. #3, I have no plans of using.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #29  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Under the axle is often chosen when space is not available for a proper free flowing exhaust routing over the axle.
As for before, after or at the axle... It really depends on where your tuning point will end up.
If you intend to use a long primary system for a bridgeport to RBs specs you will want to put your collection point ~9-10' from the engine. Depending on the length of the car this point can end up before, after or at the axle.
If you use the short primary system you will need a header that collects equal length tubes in ~1-1.5'. This is well in front of the axle. You have a long length of pipe left to choose where you want to put a muffler.
I like to split the flow into two smaller pipes. I am of the opinion that two smaller ID mufflers are quieter than one big one of equivalant cross sectional area. Also you won't loose as much ground clearance.
In either system shortening the collection point pushes the tuning point up in the RPM range and hopefully the rest of your engine works well there.
Attached Thumbnails bridge port-rb-exhaust-chart.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #30  
RX7UP's Avatar
BOYCOTT EXXON MOBIL!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 0
From: USA
Just buy your neighbors some ear plugs...

By the way... Does any one have any dyno slips with two RB mufflers one in front of the other?...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 11:47 PM
  #31  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
No dyno slip, but the RX3 did high 12s @ ~108mph in the 1/4 with my three muffler short primary system and the stock tall gears. Changing the gear livened it up quite a bit but I didn't run it on the 1/4 again.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #32  
karism's Avatar
Adolf Hitler Verfechter
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Northern South Africa
Getting a Bp bareable ,nevermind quiet,is a hell of a mission,without loosing allot of performance.To be honest,i dont believe it is possible at all.

Way back in the day i used a 2.5 " short primary ,going through 3 silncers,to try and quiet it down.The end result was just a nice loss of Hp ,and i kept on blowing up the 2 middle silencers ,so i went back to a single silencer. Ears didnt like it,but holy hell it made a big difference in performance.

Next Bp motor will have a 3" system ,with a single silencer ,as that is all the beetle will have space for.Ear plugs would be required.

Besides,being the loudest car at the track,is fun!Even if you are road registered.

karis
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danielbradley2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 28, 2015 10:44 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
scissorhands
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Sep 16, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.