New Member RX-7 Technical Post your first technical questions here, in an easy flame free environment, before jumping into the main technical sections.

Pros and cons of a FB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
roseda91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: colorado
CO Pros and cons of a FB

hey ive searched here and havent been able to find a thread that talks about the pros and cons of a fb....i have set my mind on getting a fb so no matter what im gonna get one just wanna know
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #2  
RTRx7's Avatar
Rammer Jammer
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 750
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
What kind of pros and cons??
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 10:41 PM
  #3  
RTRx7's Avatar
Rammer Jammer
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 750
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Neither do I.

Ask a specific question and we might get somewhere.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 12:10 AM
  #4  
DrifterX's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: CA, Socal.
oh wow really people? i don't think it's that hard to understand.

i think he meant the pros an cons of owning and fb.

i have to say for pros
-light weight.
-cheaper to build then fc and fd's.
-done right can be a nice car.
-do to many new parts for it can be a really fast car.

cons
-hard to find in mint condition.
-chances are a lot of things have to be changed because of the age.
-the specs of the car in stock shape is completely outdated to current cars .

if i was ever going to build a race car only i would probably go with the fb, just because down the line if i ever wrecked i know i would be ok with it.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #5  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Pro - Its an FB
Con - Its an FB

seriously though:
Pro
-A very light car, power to weight is decent and can be improved readily with new parts available
-You can find one pretty cheap
-"cheaper to build then fc and fd's" YES

cons
-"hard to find in mint condition."YES
-"chances are a lot of things have to be changed because of the age."
-"the specs of the car in stock shape is completely outdated to current cars" ie more money to get it to perform like you want it.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #6  
RTRx7's Avatar
Rammer Jammer
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 750
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by DrifterX
oh wow really people? i don't think it's that hard to understand.

i think he meant the pros an cons of owning and fb.

i have to say for pros
-light weight.
-cheaper to build then fc and fd's.
-done right can be a nice car.
-do to many new parts for it can be a really fast car.

cons
-hard to find in mint condition.
-chances are a lot of things have to be changed because of the age.
-the specs of the car in stock shape is completely outdated to current cars .

if i was ever going to build a race car only i would probably go with the fb, just because down the line if i ever wrecked i know i would be ok with it.
Sadly, many of your pros and cons could go the same way for any rx7 and not just for an fb, hence, why I was trying to get a specific question.

Fb's are the only factory carb'd rx7s not including the se. I would keep that in mind.

If you have emissions, they should be exempt, so I suppose that is a pro.

Other than that, its hard to know any pros and cons without knowing what you're going to use it for.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #7  
roseda91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: colorado
sorry wasnt too specific..well i want it as a daily but i also want to make it quicker..just wondering what things usually do to age go bad on fbs? im going to afgahnistan for a year so ill do enough research over there just want to know what are comming things that mess up.. anyone have any other websites that i can search through? thanks!!
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #8  
roseda91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: colorado
was also wondering ive heard that 12a is better for N/A but 13b is better for boost...i want a gsl-se but if the 12a is a better N/A motor then i would get something diffrent thanks
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #9  
rxtasy3's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 290
From: Spartanburg, SC
Originally Posted by roseda91
i have set my mind on getting a fb so no matter what im gonna get one
so why waste the time to post what the pros or cons r if it doesn't matter? IMO the pros of owning an fb is lighter weight and easier to work on of any gen. haven't found any cons of owning one. 12a can be boosted just the same as the 13b. the 13b in the gslse is also N/A. if that's what u want then get one. the usual bolt ons like carb, intake, exhaust, will gain u an average of like 20% in power. for more, u'll need to do a build and port job. then of course a turbo is next for even more power. and as for what goes bad with age on an fb, everything, and also holds true with any vehicle. it's more of what ur willing to accept and fix when owning an older vehicle.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #10  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Since you are going to get one anyway...you should look at it this way

Pro: Its an RX7
Con: Its an RX7
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #11  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
Lighter than any other model
Easier to modify
Cheaper to modify
Can be made into a great performer for the fraction of an fc/fd
The only fc that ever beat me in an autocross had a big V8 and the course suited it





.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #12  
bmeyer's Avatar
"Greatest Show on Turf"
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: boulder creek, ca
Yeah, I'll say two of the cons to an FB is the lack of rack and pinion steering, and lots of steering boxes have a lot of play. But, with some $$$ and time and motivation, they're far better than a FC or FD for cost and coolness reasons (sorry FC and FD guys). On the '79 SA's you have an external regulator so that's another expensive *** thing that goes bad after a while. SA's also have some lame features, such as having the hood prop on the passenger side, no full-time voltmeter, no oil press. sender, etc. But SA's and FB's are best in my opinion, and pretty easy to work on.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #13  
-xlr8planet-'s Avatar
I has an emblem
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 5
From: Argentina
dont question yourself and get 2 of them

thats what I did
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #14  
alex ruano's Avatar
dj aztek
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: lake elsinore ca
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
Oct 4, 2016 08:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.