Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Small Bridgeport made 240WHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2010 | 05:59 AM
  #26  
JZG's Avatar
JZG
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 152
Likes: 14
From: 3116
I agree. Somethings not quite right. Although pretty, I think the intake manifold and possibly the injector placement is killing power output. Going back to the traditional IDA style intake would most likely net a better result. For example, a 13b pp made 300rwhp at 10500rpm. Torque was 150ft/lb @ 10500rpm, and peaked at 187ft/lb @ 8000rpm. Timing was about 26deg. In my experience timing is dictated more by the compression ratio/combustion chamber depth, than anything else, although VE definitely has a bearing.

I'd be surprised if upgrading the ignition makes much more power. If at all possible do a back to back test on the dyno. Let us know how you get on.

Last edited by JZG; Mar 6, 2010 at 06:07 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #27  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
Well, I think I might have found part of the problem. Friday night I noticed that two of the nuts on the lower part of the manifold were never tightened. I was in a hurry getting everthing together. The rest of the bolts were tight, but I have to believe it wasn't good to have those other two nuts just hand tightened.

Everything is tight now, and we're working on the ignition. Hopefully it helps.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #28  
eddierotary's Avatar
back with rotaries
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: Watertown, NY
any updates?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 11:30 AM
  #29  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
Just got back from Cal speedway, we had problems though. We had put some coils on that were built for drag racing, power was good for a lap or two, then would start falling off and wouldn't want to rev. We're pretty sure that was the problem, still need to go to the dyno. I have a feeling that the intake might be a little to crazy for my porting.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #30  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
Another thing I was thinking, I have a feeling that my dry sump combined with 10.5" wide slicks are probably robbing at least 10hp at the wheels. what do you guys think? The dry sump pressure is set at just over 100psi and holds a total of 12qts between the tank/and 2 fat oil coolers. redline 20-50w oil. I'm pretty sure I would pick up horse if I had a normal wet sump and 205 wide street tires. This obviously is not would I would run for road racing though. Just food for thought.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #31  
eddierotary's Avatar
back with rotaries
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: Watertown, NY
IMO you should go back to the intake you had before. seems that it would work better that you new one. but is just my opinion. you ever try to swich intakes on practice runs to see any difference?

eddie
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #32  
jgrewe's Avatar
GET OFF MY LAWN
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 2
From: Fla.
What are the ID's and lengths of you intake? It looks like you may have low velocity in the intake that is killing your torque. That power curve still climbing shows you have plenty on the top.

If they are limiting your rwhp in the class, bring the power lower and make a fast tractor out of it with more torque.

And yes, the slicks will suck power on the rollers compared to street tires. I don't think the dry sump is hurting power any more than a stock pump at the same pressure. It may be better if the pump is a better design.

Last edited by jgrewe; Mar 21, 2010 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #33  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
Originally Posted by eddierotary
IMO you should go back to the intake you had before. seems that it would work better that you new one. but is just my opinion. you ever try to swich intakes on practice runs to see any difference?

eddie
It takes to long to swap intakes at the track. Different TPS', and fuel injectors, throttle linkages, etc. We could do it, but I'd rather not do it at the track. I will be able to tell which setup is faster, I just need a weekend without problems.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 10:38 AM
  #34  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
I run at Buttonwillow next month, I ran a 1:54.7 last year with the old intake, we'll see what I run this time. I still need to change the ignition coils to non-drag race coils.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #35  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by GSLSE-YA
Another thing I was thinking, I have a feeling that my dry sump combined with 10.5" wide slicks are probably robbing at least 10hp at the wheels. what do you guys think? The dry sump pressure is set at just over 100psi and holds a total of 12qts between the tank/and 2 fat oil coolers. redline 20-50w oil. I'm pretty sure I would pick up horse if I had a normal wet sump and 205 wide street tires. This obviously is not would I would run for road racing though. Just food for thought.
you could do lighter oil and drop the PSI a little, but why? if you're not going to run it at the track like that, it doesn't matter...

our (piston) engine guy is a drag racer and they run like 0 wt oil at stock pressure. um... they get away with it, but you know their whole season is shorter than one session road racing, AND they expect to rebuild the thing at least once....
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #36  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
We still have Pennzoil 70-weight in stock!

Back inna old days, you opened the clearances up a lot so the whippy cast crank in the floppy slightly-lighter-than-it-really-should-be cheese iron block wouldn't hit the bearings too much. Then you ran high oil pressure to try to stabilize things, and super thick oil so it didn't just fall right out of the first bearing journal it came across.

0w oils are permissible because of strong cranks and stronger blocks that allow sub-.001" bearing clearances.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #37  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by peejay
0w oils are permissible because of strong cranks and stronger blocks that allow sub-.001" bearing clearances.
you're basically right, but its still not a good idea to go roadracing like that. our honda engines basically don't last the whole 25 hour race as is, and that's with thicker oil, oil cooler, and an accusump.

we actually calculated this out, the entire battle of the imports (or whatever) drag racing season is under 15 minutes of run time, our road race season is like 20something hours. its a huge difference
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #38  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
That's why I don't really want to try lighter oils. Right now I'm trying to concentrate on getting the oil temp down anyway. I have a bitchin' oil system with two oil coolers, but I have bad duct work leading to them. I saw almost 240* temps at the end of a 30min race, meanwhile my water temp was only 160*. Not good!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:54 PM
  #39  
eddierotary's Avatar
back with rotaries
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: Watertown, NY
so how is the racecar running latelly?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 02:55 AM
  #40  
dj55b's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
also interested in the new result with the ignition and maybe intake mod?

As for torque you should be netting some more, I get 132 ft-lb with 12A SP that's been run for 2 years now, running stock seals, nothing balanced or lightened on the inside.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #41  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
The ignition didn't have much effect. It seems like the stock second gen coils with one MSD digital 6 box was enough. It turns out that I had a fuel pump going out causing the motor to run lean and lose HP. We have that fixed now.

We just put the old intake back on with one exception, we had a machine shop cut almost 2" from the top of the lower intake manifold, and welded it back up. We had to do some grinding on the inside of the ports afterwords to smooth it out slightly. Hopefully we'll get it back on the dyno soon. We use to make around 232whp @ 8000rpm and 165ft/lbs, that is SAE corrected dynojet results. With the short intake we made 240whp @ 9500rpm and 140-142ft/lbs.

I'm hoping to make 235whp @ 8500rpm and 160-165ft/lbs of torque with the old intake shortened. I should have dyno results next week.

In the meantime we've been working on suspension and trying to get the car lower. We clearanced the inside fender wells, and cut 3/4" from the bump stops. I also am modifying the bump steer adjustment kit that Mazdatrix sells for the FC and adapting it to my car. I put another inch of turn in spacers below the struts and purchased the ackerman arms that sevensonly sells. I'm hoping to optimize my suspension geometry in the front soon. We are also relocating the 3rd link (trilink) from underneath the car to inside the car.

Getting prepared for nationals in September!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #42  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
its hard to get a lot of torque out of something that has a 1.1" stroke (if talking piston banter)
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 03:32 AM
  #43  
Liborek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Czech republic
Originally Posted by fidelity101
its hard to get a lot of torque out of something that has a 1.1" stroke (if talking piston banter)
wrong.

Torque is function of BMEP and displacement. Nothing more, nothing less.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #44  
GSLSE-YA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Scott Howard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: Newbury Park, CA
My torque was great before, I was planning on losing some torque with the modified intake, but not that much. I also expected to gain more than 8hp. My porting is to small for the intake. When we tear this motor apart in the future we will turn it into a J or D Bridge, then we'll try the intake again.

My porting is small, even for a non J bridge. My intermediate housing port still has the peanut shaped port, it's got the bridge, but much smaller than the ports on the end housings.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 10:16 PM
  #45  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
Originally Posted by Liborek
wrong.

Torque is function of BMEP and displacement. Nothing more, nothing less.
actually were both right
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MazdaspeedR1
The Bad & Fugly Businesses
27
May 22, 2018 05:58 PM
troym55
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
May 25, 2016 12:42 PM
apooch
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
Sep 4, 2015 10:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.