Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Intake length, and air horn length question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-10, 04:04 AM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Intake length, and air horn length question

If I were to increase my intake length by 1/2" would I see a notable change in the power band? Also been trying to get back some info on the effects of different air horns
Old 01-27-10, 04:53 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
McCarthy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not 100% on how much 1/2" would effect the power band. I do know that the longer intakes are better for peak power. From port the the base of my ITB's i measure about 13".

Its funny this thread should crop up. I was just thinking if anyone had played around with really long intakes lentghs. I mean like 20" or so?
Old 01-27-10, 08:55 AM
  #3  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by McCarthy
I'm not 100% on how much 1/2" would effect the power band. I do know that the longer intakes are better for peak power. From port the the base of my ITB's i measure about 13".

Its funny this thread should crop up. I was just thinking if anyone had played around with really long intakes lentghs. I mean like 20" or so?

I think you have it backwards. Longer intake runners move the torque peak lower in the power band not higher. Look at the 787b as an example. The runner started fully extended then got shorter as the rpms raised to give that engine a broad power band.
Old 01-27-10, 09:35 AM
  #4  
Waffles - hmmm good

iTrader: (1)
 
t_g_farrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Wylie, N.C.
Posts: 8,783
Received 282 Likes on 232 Posts
Yeah thats why folks use the wrap around intakes for DCOE type carb
applications. Make the carbs more streatable by moving the peak power
band down a bit. At least thats my understanding.
Old 01-27-10, 10:43 AM
  #5  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
As little as 1/8" may have an effect on power. A half an inch might do a little bit. Watch your a/f ratios if possible to see if there are any changes. If there are, and tuning effects may be masked by it.
Old 01-27-10, 10:44 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
McCarthy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes right you are read the artical wrong!!! derrrrrrrr.
Old 01-27-10, 12:53 PM
  #7  
Been here since dirt...

 
gawdodirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AZ

Originally Posted by rotarygod
As little as 1/8" may have an effect on power. A half an inch might do a little bit. Watch your a/f ratios if possible to see if there are any changes. If there are, and tuning effects may be masked by it.


Not picking on anyone, but RB had actual data. They stated that their 48IDA insulator/spacer lowers the peak torque 500 rpm for each added spacer. Each spacer was .500.

So that is some good data. But , that is on their system using their 4 port IDA manifold and they did not state what other mods or porting they used.


Just a note. The rotary has little torque and is not likely to make huge amounts because the manifold is 36" long. The "tuning" only moves it up or down . Other tenets of the porting determine the amount of efficiency/torque available at a given RPM.
The air horns affect the completely wide open throttle performance and don't do a whole lot for the rest of the powerband with the throttle blades limiting their function, but They do play a huge role in the idle performance when a huge amount of overlap is present. The carb needs to be able to control the "standoff.' That is the fog over the air horns that is actually atomized and mixed air/fuel. If you have a baseline horn and there is a standoff of any given amount, then increase to capture that fog.
We used a Holley 650 for some time very sucessfully using a large hand made air horn on only the primaries. This was on a full bridge and it did boost the bottom end over no horn.


GD

Last edited by gawdodirt; 01-27-10 at 01:19 PM.
Old 01-27-10, 01:11 PM
  #8  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gawdodirt
Not picking on anyone, but RB had actual data. They stated that their 48IDA insulator/spacer lowers the peak torque 500 rpm for each added spacer. Each spacer was .500.

So that is some good data. But , that is on their system using their 4 port IDA manifold and they did not state what other mods or porting they used.


Just a note. The rotary has little torque and is not likely to make huge amounts because the manifold is 36" long. The "tuning" only moves it up or down . Other tenets of the porting determine the amount of efficiency/torque available at a given RPM.

But, you knew that already...

GD
I just looked this up, and it say about 300-500rpm, but i don't think those spacers are 1/2" by the looks of things I think they're more 1/4". But either way my power band coming down a bit is not a bad thing. I'm peaking at 8000 rpm right now, would like to have that closer to 7000 rpm.

What about the air horns though? What effect does that give off when changing the length? Is it seen the same as changing the length of the manifold?
Old 01-28-10, 02:03 PM
  #9  
Been here since dirt...

 
gawdodirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AZ

Originally Posted by dj55b
I just looked this up, and it say about 300-500rpm, but i don't think those spacers are 1/2" by the looks of things I think they're more 1/4". But either way my power band coming down a bit is not a bad thing. I'm peaking at 8000 rpm right now, would like to have that closer to 7000 rpm.

What about the air horns though? What effect does that give off when changing the length? Is it seen the same as changing the length of the manifold?
I do think it is only having a great effect when WOT. That why the example of the 787 and the variable sliding barrels is a good one. When you have the throttle half open, the blade is acting like a choke or dam. The stand-off is only to get better throttle response as it begins to open. The fog is all mixed and ready to go as opposed to an acellerator pump shot.

gd

Last edited by gawdodirt; 01-28-10 at 02:06 PM.
Old 01-28-10, 02:54 PM
  #10  
JZG
Full Member

 
JZG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 3116
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Changing air horn length is the same as changing intake manifold length. The engine "see's" the end of the air horn, not the throttle plates. Changing intake length directly influences peak hp rpm. The shorter the manifold, the higher the rpm at which peak hp occurs, resulting in more peak hp. The longer the manifold the less peak hp made, usually with mid range gains, but not always.

Stand-off is due to bad port timing, incorrect exhaust primary length, or excessive exhaust back pressure. Or all of the above. In my experience stand-off is a bad thing. It creates a 'hole' in the power curve and throttle response is usually worse.
Old 01-28-10, 03:37 PM
  #11  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gawdodirt
I do think it is only having a great effect when WOT. That why the example of the 787 and the variable sliding barrels is a good one. When you have the throttle half open, the blade is acting like a choke or dam. The stand-off is only to get better throttle response as it begins to open. The fog is all mixed and ready to go as opposed to an acellerator pump shot.

gd
Wouldn't the whole area under the curve just shift though making slightly better bottom end? That's the way I would see it and not just a peak being increased or decreased.
Old 01-28-10, 03:41 PM
  #12  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JZG
Changing air horn length is the same as changing intake manifold length. The engine "see's" the end of the air horn, not the throttle plates. Changing intake length directly influences peak hp rpm. The shorter the manifold, the higher the rpm at which peak hp occurs, resulting in more peak hp. The longer the manifold the less peak hp made, usually with mid range gains, but not always.

Stand-off is due to bad port timing, incorrect exhaust primary length, or excessive exhaust back pressure. Or all of the above. In my experience stand-off is a bad thing. It creates a 'hole' in the power curve and throttle response is usually worse.
Good to know!
Old 01-28-10, 04:00 PM
  #13  
Been here since dirt...

 
gawdodirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AZ

Originally Posted by JZG
Changing air horn length is the same as changing intake manifold length. The engine "see's" the end of the air horn, not the throttle plates. Changing intake length directly influences peak hp rpm. The shorter the manifold, the higher the rpm at which peak hp occurs, resulting in more peak hp. The longer the manifold the less peak hp made, usually with mid range gains, but not always.

Stand-off is due to bad port timing, incorrect exhaust primary length, or excessive exhaust back pressure. Or all of the above. In my experience stand-off is a bad thing. It creates a 'hole' in the power curve and throttle response is usually worse.

Not true. The reason is that the blade effectively changes the cross section of the tube and therefore velocity and volume. Velocity is what carries the resonant wave. No velocity, or movement, no wave. Simple as that. You do not tune your engine to run best at half throttle. Well, most people don't. It's a wide open tube attribute. That is why they mostly use a slide throttle on anything really serious. No blade to reflect or block the given cross section.

It's usually because of overlap. And the other attributes not factored into a new port config. Like installing a PP in a car that has a street exhaust. Not well thought out to the end . Not BAD port timing exclusively. It might be wrong for the length of intake tract. But it is tunable. You must not have had much luck in tuning standoff. David Vizard is an author I highly recommend you take a look at. Hp Books.

gd
Old 01-29-10, 04:22 PM
  #14  
Been here since dirt...

 
gawdodirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AZ

Originally Posted by dj55b
Wouldn't the whole area under the curve just shift though making slightly better bottom end? That's the way I would see it and not just a peak being increased or decreased.
This is correct. Eventually you get to a point where the length affects the operating of the engine and then it would reduce hp. You know, where the volume becomes too much to accellerate in the given window of time the port is open.

gd
Old 01-29-10, 11:48 PM
  #15  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gawdodirt
This is correct. Eventually you get to a point where the length affects the operating of the engine and then it would reduce hp. You know, where the volume becomes too much to accellerate in the given window of time the port is open.

gd
Ahh, Gotcha. Now when making a plenum, shouldn't the length of the intake be taken into consideration also then as far as how much volume it requires before choking the engine?

For example lets say that the runners are only 3" long, and have a volume of 50 cubic inch, then you make a plenum and realize that you need a minimum volume of 400 cubic inch in that to make it work without chocking power. If that is the same engine, but with longer runners say 12" and have 200 cubic inch in the runners, then could you say that a 250 cubic inch plenum would work just as good? Is it correct to look at things like that? Or is plenum volume not directly correlated like that?
Old 02-05-10, 04:05 PM
  #16  
Been here since dirt...

 
gawdodirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A plenum will never choke the engine, unless it is a restriction. The benefit of a plenum is to contain the homogenized air/fuel mixture in a ready to use state and help to damp the pulses to the carb/venturi. It also serves a function of equalizing the runners, or at least allowing the possibility all ports having an equal length.
The rotary engine config is optimum for a "pig trough" style or "log runner" style.

gd
Old 02-06-10, 01:26 AM
  #17  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gawdodirt
A plenum will never choke the engine, unless it is a restriction. The benefit of a plenum is to contain the homogenized air/fuel mixture in a ready to use state and help to damp the pulses to the carb/venturi. It also serves a function of equalizing the runners, or at least allowing the possibility all ports having an equal length.
The rotary engine config is optimum for a "pig trough" style or "log runner" style.

gd
whats a pig through style?
Old 02-06-10, 01:35 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
Liborek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dj55b
Ahh, Gotcha. Now when making a plenum, shouldn't the length of the intake be taken into consideration also then as far as how much volume it requires before choking the engine?

For example lets say that the runners are only 3" long, and have a volume of 50 cubic inch, then you make a plenum and realize that you need a minimum volume of 400 cubic inch in that to make it work without chocking power. If that is the same engine, but with longer runners say 12" and have 200 cubic inch in the runners, then could you say that a 250 cubic inch plenum would work just as good? Is it correct to look at things like that? Or is plenum volume not directly correlated like that?
I think that plenum volume isnīt correlated with runners volume. From point of pressure wave tuning, plenum is acting like open atmosphere. So effective intake length is from port face to runner opening in plenum.

Plenum volume, I really donīt know as there are many engines with plenum and I canīt find any correlation between displacement, operating RPMs etc.
I think that plenum should be sized and shaped to equalize flow to all runners.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
12abridgeport
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
08-17-15 06:28 PM



Quick Reply: Intake length, and air horn length question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.