Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

exhaust question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
xFCdrift3Sx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ocean city, maryland
MD exhaust question

when people talk about exhausts back pressure always comes up eventually. do rotarys need back pressure?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #2  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
no.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 12:30 PM
  #3  
xFCdrift3Sx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ocean city, maryland
ok thank you
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 02:53 AM
  #4  
lloyd12a's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: Sydney, Australia
They run a better with no back pressure, then there's the NOISE.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #5  
xFCdrift3Sx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ocean city, maryland
lol. yea i experienced that NOISE first hand a couple times. it was bad, and yet................
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #6  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
so whats the diameter should it have?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
Not one internal ombustion engine on the planet needs any type of back pressure. Back pressure is bad! velocity is good. You want an exhaust system that keeps velocity up. in the early days of tuning back pressure was confused with velocity and hense the parroted incorrect "knowlege" continues...
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by mario1386
so whats the diameter should it have?
2.5" people have gone bigger, but the gains are small, and the noise is BIG
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 10:39 AM
  #9  
Super82's Avatar
Zoom Zoom
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Hyper4mance2k
Not one internal ombustion engine on the planet needs any type of back pressure. Back pressure is bad! velocity is good. You want an exhaust system that keeps velocity up. in the early days of tuning back pressure was confused with velocity and hense the parroted incorrect "knowlege" continues...
Not true. Are you familar with a two stroke?

But yeah everything else you said is right.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #10  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 571
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by Super82
Not true. Are you familar with a two stroke?
Two strokes are ESPECIALLY senstive to backpressure. They really really really do not like it.

It is critical to not confuse resonance tuning with backpressure. Resonance tuning *is* important for "closing the door" port wise but it couldn't work at all in the first place if there was backpressure in the system.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 10:09 PM
  #11  
SleepeR1st's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 18
From: Candia, New Hampshire
Think of it like a wood stove. You open the door wide open and the flames lick up, you close the door, but leave it cracked a little and the flames get even bigger.

A properly sized exhaust for your application will ALWAYS be the best option.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 10:05 PM
  #12  
kendark2light's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 1
From: howell, michigan
mines got a rb header 2.5 to a flowmaster 40 where the main cat used to be and it goes out to a long rice can sounds nice got warned bout the noise in town once it a 88 na not that it matters
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #13  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
what they all said
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #14  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
2.5" people have gone bigger, but the gains are small, and the noise is BIG
If I recall correctly Defined Autoworks made more power going from a 3" to a 2.5".

But size of the pipe also depends a lot on the specific engine build.
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #15  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by farberio
If I recall correctly Defined Autoworks made more power going from a 3" to a 2.5".

But size of the pipe also depends a lot on the specific engine build.
yep to both.
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #16  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
so if its a stock port motor would a 2.25 inner diameter pipe (5feet long) then a single exit to a 3in right under the diff to the muffler would it be good?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
Apr 14, 2016 12:58 PM
12abridgeport
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 17, 2015 06:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.