Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Borla/ TWM ITBs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-18, 11:45 AM
  #26  
dont kill the cones

Thread Starter
 
13.bREW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 361
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The LIM is a Racing Beat IDA 48/51 they have it labeled for their carb kit but it will fit anything with the IDA footprint.
Old 12-28-18, 09:40 PM
  #27  
Rotating

 
Jimbo II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 604
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
This is what I need for my car!
Old 12-28-18, 10:12 PM
  #28  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
mikey D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 848
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I've been running this setup for a while if you have any questions
Old 12-28-18, 11:23 PM
  #29  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
where does it stand now?
Old 12-28-18, 11:50 PM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
mikey D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 848
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
What do you mean by that?
Old 12-29-18, 01:46 AM
  #31  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
Sorry. That was directed at the OP. Was asking him if his car is running yet or not.

However, since I have your ear, did the Megasquirt and ignition system net any gains for your SE? Any photos?
Old 12-29-18, 09:55 AM
  #32  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
mikey D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 848
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I haven't been on a Dyno with the megasquirt but seat of pants say i picked up some power and drivability is way better. I'm running sequential- only 2 injectors (id1000) this time and coil on plug instead if batch and 2nd gen ignition. I'd guess peak power is probably within 5 or 10 percent, of before but everywhere else pulls really good compared to before


Engine1

Last edited by mikey D; 12-29-18 at 10:00 AM.
Old 12-29-18, 10:17 PM
  #33  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
Originally Posted by mikey D
I haven't been on a Dyno with the megasquirt but seat of pants say i picked up some power and drivability is way better.
Meaning more under the cruve, but not necessarily up top? Or up top, too?
Old 12-29-18, 11:07 PM
  #34  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
mikey D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 848
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Faster everywhere but it's less if an improvement on top compared to 3k-6k. Also a nifty thing is a Weber this big would stumble and big on quick throttle movement down low, my setup doesn't. It just pulls.

I'm really happy with the megasquirt and the ign-a1 coils in coil on plug configuration
Old 12-30-18, 04:32 AM
  #35  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
That is encouraging. I can't wait to get mine running.

Originally Posted by mikey D
Also a nifty thing is a Weber this big would stumble and big on quick throttle movement down low, my setup doesn't. It just pulls.
Funny you mention this, because I remember seeing where someone had used one the 55 mm throttles on a non-race engine (I don't remember if it was ported at all), but they were saying the same thing about the throttle response and I thought it had to be the magic of having fuel injection and a good EMS. After seeing it, I remember thinking I sort have wished I had gone 55 since throttle response was one of the factors that made me choose the 50.
Old 12-30-18, 09:39 PM
  #36  
Junior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
BlackEuropa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope Borla took the time to work out the TWM itb bugs.

I ran a pair of dcoe TWM itbs on a Ford Zetec motor 10 years ago. They look pretty, but were nothing but problems. The linkage between the 2 shafts was poorly designed and wouldn't hold a setting. The cable stay and connection to the shaft was a bad angle and didn't allow smooth throttle application. The plates would stick in the bores so when I tried to accelerate smoothly from a standstill they would pop open and jerk the car. Then one of the bushings came dislodged and walked out of the shaft bore.

I bought a pair of Jenveys from the UK and never looked back. Expensive, and worth every penny.
Old 12-31-18, 10:39 AM
  #37  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
mikey D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 848
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I bought mine directly from twm 10 ish years ago. I have none of the issues you mentioned. The throttle shaft is basically the same as the carb and goes though both barrels there is no linkage so to speak as we just have the 2 barrels. Same with the trottle pull. Its pretty much standard stuff.

i could upload a shakey cell phone video if it gives folks the warm and fuzzies.

Last edited by mikey D; 12-31-18 at 10:42 AM.
Old 01-04-19, 09:26 AM
  #38  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,504
Received 414 Likes on 295 Posts
Originally Posted by mikey D
I bought mine directly from twm 10 ish years ago. I have none of the issues you mentioned. The throttle shaft is basically the same as the carb and goes though both barrels there is no linkage so to speak as we just have the 2 barrels. Same with the trottle pull. Its pretty much standard stuff.

i could upload a shakey cell phone video if it gives folks the warm and fuzzies.
On a Zetec (or any 4 port 4cyl, really) you will be using two throttle bodies, and you have to synchronize the two for even flow. Us rotary guys have it really easy unless you have a rare dual DCOE manifold.
Old 01-05-19, 09:55 AM
  #39  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,789
Received 2,569 Likes on 1,828 Posts
i have great respect for those guys that can get anything with more than 2 carbs running right, its just crazy how complex that is
Old 01-05-19, 03:55 PM
  #40  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
i've never had to sync a set, myself, but i kinda figured it was very complicated - both by what i've been told by people who have, and by virtue of the fact that i remember there was a special tool that Rotary Engineering had in their catalog just for that purpose.
Old 01-09-19, 03:26 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
rycam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kenku
Doing this lazymode... old Mazda paper has 18" from port surface to trumpet entrance (this is for peripheral port but should basically apply) providing resonance at 7k RPM, 16" at 8k RPM, 14" at 8.5k. Assuming the R26B was basically the same port configuration and matching the torque peaks to the other paper, its minimum runner length was 14" - if that's right, according to its paper, it was running 15" runner length at 8k rpm, 17" at 7.5k, 19" at 7k, and 21" at 6k RPM and below.

A whole lot of rules of thumb, assumptions and fudge factors in that list there, but it's a place to start.
Any chance you guys have a link to the old Mazda paper you could share? I'm very interested in the NA 6port bridgeport ITB race setup.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kruel13
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
41
11-10-21 05:24 PM
7_rocket
Build Threads
74
01-16-19 02:35 PM
toyzforme
Haltech Forum
3
03-07-16 08:41 AM
Dan Ritchie
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
02-18-16 06:43 PM



Quick Reply: Borla/ TWM ITBs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.