Microtech LTX-12 20B Dyno numbers
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
LTX-12 20B Dyno numbers
Finally had a chance to get back to a dyno after the turbo and boost controller upgrade. With some help from a good friend. Lee, from Toscano Racing, we cleaned up the super fat AFR on the top end. Can you say almost 400 RWHP @ 7psi!? After that we, tuned for 12psi and ended up with:
525 RWHP @12psi and 411 ft/lbs torque on 93 octane pump gas! Talk about sounding sweet.
After I left, the guys from the shop called and said that I could come back and pull again for free because the dyno was set @ 4500' elevation instead of 900' so they were so excited to see the 525 at that setting, they said it will be even more with the elevation corrected.
525 RWHP @12psi and 411 ft/lbs torque on 93 octane pump gas! Talk about sounding sweet.
After I left, the guys from the shop called and said that I could come back and pull again for free because the dyno was set @ 4500' elevation instead of 900' so they were so excited to see the 525 at that setting, they said it will be even more with the elevation corrected.
Rotary Freak
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
Nice numbers Derrick! Glad to hear that your car is making some good numbers.
I do have a question about the elevation though. If the settings were set to a higher elevation, shouldn't the numbers be higher than when it was set to lower elevation? I would imagine that it should with the correction factor to make it more comparable for different altitude. Maybe I'm not thinking this right and you can enlighten me on this if I was wrong. What was your correction factor? I would imagine that it should be somewhere around 1.05?
steve
I do have a question about the elevation though. If the settings were set to a higher elevation, shouldn't the numbers be higher than when it was set to lower elevation? I would imagine that it should with the correction factor to make it more comparable for different altitude. Maybe I'm not thinking this right and you can enlighten me on this if I was wrong. What was your correction factor? I would imagine that it should be somewhere around 1.05?
steve
Originally Posted by rxman720b
Finally had a chance to get back to a dyno after the turbo and boost controller upgrade. With some help from a good friend. Lee, from Toscano Racing, we cleaned up the super fat AFR on the top end. Can you say almost 400 RWHP @ 7psi!? After that we, tuned for 12psi and ended up with:
525 RWHP @12psi and 411 ft/lbs torque on 93 octane pump gas! Talk about sounding sweet.
After I left, the guys from the shop called and said that I could come back and pull again for free because the dyno was set @ 4500' elevation instead of 900' so they were so excited to see the 525 at that setting, they said it will be even more with the elevation corrected.
525 RWHP @12psi and 411 ft/lbs torque on 93 octane pump gas! Talk about sounding sweet.
After I left, the guys from the shop called and said that I could come back and pull again for free because the dyno was set @ 4500' elevation instead of 900' so they were so excited to see the 525 at that setting, they said it will be even more with the elevation corrected.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
Originally Posted by FB II
******* sweet! when do you see full boost by?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
Originally Posted by pluto
Nice numbers Derrick! Glad to hear that your car is making some good numbers.
I do have a question about the elevation though. If the settings were set to a higher elevation, shouldn't the numbers be higher than when it was set to lower elevation? I would imagine that it should with the correction factor to make it more comparable for different altitude. Maybe I'm not thinking this right and you can enlighten me on this if I was wrong. What was your correction factor? I would imagine that it should be somewhere around 1.05?
steve
I do have a question about the elevation though. If the settings were set to a higher elevation, shouldn't the numbers be higher than when it was set to lower elevation? I would imagine that it should with the correction factor to make it more comparable for different altitude. Maybe I'm not thinking this right and you can enlighten me on this if I was wrong. What was your correction factor? I would imagine that it should be somewhere around 1.05?
steve
Last edited by rxman720b; Dec 12, 2005 at 12:00 AM.
Great tuning Lee (tearbo2).
Derrick I wonder if that 525rwhp fells anything like my 750rwhp Supra (sold)
I know what it feels like to be shot out of sling-shot!!!!
Are you going to take her to the track? You can borrow my tires.
Derrick I wonder if that 525rwhp fells anything like my 750rwhp Supra (sold)
I know what it feels like to be shot out of sling-shot!!!!Are you going to take her to the track? You can borrow my tires.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
Originally Posted by fastrx7man
Great tuning Lee (tearbo2).
Derrick I wonder if that 525rwhp fells anything like my 750rwhp Supra (sold) I know what it feels like to be shot out of sling-shot!!!!
Are you going to take her to the track? You can borrow my tires.
Derrick I wonder if that 525rwhp fells anything like my 750rwhp Supra (sold)
I know what it feels like to be shot out of sling-shot!!!!Are you going to take her to the track? You can borrow my tires.
Originally Posted by rxman720b
Hey Bill, when will the red one be back on the street? Did Lee install the "Bubbles under boost option" to the exhaust system?
Weird Cat Man
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
Added to my dyno page:
http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/dyno.php
http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/graph.php?...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/dyno.php
http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/graph.php?...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
