T04S Turbo II vs. 330whp STi (Video)
04-04-07, 05:59 PM
#76
marky
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BDoty311
Me and my friend went out and ran for fun the other day. He has a nice 05 STi with a Utec, exhaust, intake, water injection, and a few other well thought mods. Probably pushing around 330whp and 370wtq.
My FC has a T04s 60-1, haltech, 1600cc and 720cc injectors, Spearco FMIC, mild street port, ect. I was running 12 psi.
http://racing.kcgeek.net/archives/Scooby_vs_BDoty.wmv right click please
From the dig, I bogged incredibly bad with the borrowed drag radials and shut down early because of that car that is coming. I wouldn't have passed him anyways, he beat me too bad off the line. First race winner: STi
No brake boosting on the roll races, 30-120 in less than 10 seconds. On the first race, he jumped the gun slightly. The second race is a good one though.
Roll race winner: RX-7
My FC has a T04s 60-1, haltech, 1600cc and 720cc injectors, Spearco FMIC, mild street port, ect. I was running 12 psi.
http://racing.kcgeek.net/archives/Scooby_vs_BDoty.wmv right click please
From the dig, I bogged incredibly bad with the borrowed drag radials and shut down early because of that car that is coming. I wouldn't have passed him anyways, he beat me too bad off the line. First race winner: STi
No brake boosting on the roll races, 30-120 in less than 10 seconds. On the first race, he jumped the gun slightly. The second race is a good one though.
Roll race winner: RX-7
People don't give STis enough credit for being incredibly fast. I thought they were slow too until I rode in one with an experienced driver who knows how to use AWD to his advantage.
04-04-07, 07:30 PM
#77
Forced Induction Speciali
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston / Kansas City
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
Your wasting your breath. You will never get any supporting evidence or proof of what they are trying to say. They just tell you "you dont get it". Apparently to them it holds more merit than physics. Just look up the posts from its n sti and spoolin spec v. Trolling in these areas is there specialty.
I know the owner of the FC and also the owner of the STI, i even worked on teh STI.
The car ran VERY good, was VERY strong...
Every time i come on here, saying i ll go by MY personal experiences i ve seen, and not ******* googlerace you guys get all pissed saying i am wrong...THERE IS THE ******* PROOF.
google that race, see who SHOULD have won....
\thread
04-04-07, 07:43 PM
#78
88 AE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love this thread. 
Yes, AWD cars have more drivetrain loss than RWD or FWD cars, but I fail to see how that means that they can't be fast from a roll.
Both of our cars were pretty damn fast, I challenge you to go 30-120 in 10 seconds. (Without brake boosting)
Yes, AWD cars have more drivetrain loss than RWD or FWD cars, but I fail to see how that means that they can't be fast from a roll.
Both of our cars were pretty damn fast, I challenge you to go 30-120 in 10 seconds. (Without brake boosting)
04-04-07, 07:49 PM
#79
Forced Induction Speciali
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston / Kansas City
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
brian, your car....was Fast, i dont think anyone can argue that....(well, these kid on here will try to argue real life, so who knows) and gregs car was VERY strong, and VERY fast for what it was...
both cars where fast, and beautiful. the owners are both totally cool, and knew their cars...
what more do you need?
both cars where fast, and beautiful. the owners are both totally cool, and knew their cars...
what more do you need?
04-05-07, 06:59 AM
#80
88 AE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spoolin spec v
brian, your car....was Fast, i dont think anyone can argue that....(well, these kid on here will try to argue real life, so who knows) and gregs car was VERY strong, and VERY fast for what it was...
both cars where fast, and beautiful. the owners are both totally cool, and knew their cars...
what more do you need?
both cars where fast, and beautiful. the owners are both totally cool, and knew their cars...
what more do you need?
04-05-07, 09:42 AM
#82
Civilization is crumblin
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eL lAY
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spoolin spec v
you guys always ask for proof..WELL HERE IT ******* IS>
I know the owner of the FC and also the owner of the STI, i even worked on teh STI.
The car ran VERY good, was VERY strong...
Every time i come on here, saying i ll go by MY personal experiences i ve seen, and not ******* googlerace you guys get all pissed saying i am wrong...THERE IS THE ******* PROOF.
google that race, see who SHOULD have won....
\thread
I know the owner of the FC and also the owner of the STI, i even worked on teh STI.
The car ran VERY good, was VERY strong...
Every time i come on here, saying i ll go by MY personal experiences i ve seen, and not ******* googlerace you guys get all pissed saying i am wrong...THERE IS THE ******* PROOF.
google that race, see who SHOULD have won....
\thread
I actually still dont even know what you were trying to prove. But thats typical...
04-05-07, 12:42 PM
#83
88 AE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
Sombody call CalTech....he knows the two cars and even did an oil change on one of them. Im sure you could come give a lecture and tittle it "Spoolin Spec V's personal experience disproves Physics". Im sure it would draw a larger crowd than Stephen Hawkings did this week.
I actually still dont even know what you were trying to prove. But thats typical...
I actually still dont even know what you were trying to prove. But thats typical...
He was just trying to point out that he knows both of us and knows both of the cars.
Seriously, this is why I stopped posting on this forum because there are way too many D-bags that live in la-la land and think that they know better than anybody else in the world.
Which is why I'm going to stop arguing in this thread, and this will probably be my last post on this God-forsaken forum!
08-16-07, 04:30 PM
#84
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the STI owner checking in. There was nothing wrong with Doty's car...there's no need for the bench racing nonsense.
The STi had Utec with my own map. I was sponsored by a shop with a mustang dyno at the time so I had plenty of time to tune it on a nice conservative map which was setup for massive torque and mild HP.
Engine Management
Header
Ported Exhaust housing
Turbo-back
Water injection
K&N filter
304 whp 358 lbs tq on 17 PSI
The short gearing of the STI is what helped. I had probably around 100 passes at the local track and found my optimal shift points which kept me in the fat power band. I was shifting at 6k so that I could take advantage of the torque. quick shifting and short gears allowed me to hang decently.
Doty's car was still badass anyway you slice it. He put several lengths on a car that trapped 109.43 mph in the 1/4. On higher boost he should have been trapping 115ish. I'd say that night it would have been 112-113.
Carry on bench racers.
The STi had Utec with my own map. I was sponsored by a shop with a mustang dyno at the time so I had plenty of time to tune it on a nice conservative map which was setup for massive torque and mild HP.
Engine Management
Header
Ported Exhaust housing
Turbo-back
Water injection
K&N filter
304 whp 358 lbs tq on 17 PSI
The short gearing of the STI is what helped. I had probably around 100 passes at the local track and found my optimal shift points which kept me in the fat power band. I was shifting at 6k so that I could take advantage of the torque. quick shifting and short gears allowed me to hang decently.
Doty's car was still badass anyway you slice it. He put several lengths on a car that trapped 109.43 mph in the 1/4. On higher boost he should have been trapping 115ish. I'd say that night it would have been 112-113.
Carry on bench racers.
08-16-07, 05:00 PM
#85
Cool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the STI owner checking in. There was nothing wrong with Doty's car...there's no need for the bench racing nonsense.
The STi had Utec with my own map. I was sponsored by a shop with a mustang dyno at the time so I had plenty of time to tune it on a nice conservative map which was setup for massive torque and mild HP.
Engine Management
Header
Ported Exhaust housing
Turbo-back
Water injection
K&N filter
304 whp 358 lbs tq on 17 PSI
The short gearing of the STI is what helped. I had probably around 100 passes at the local track and found my optimal shift points which kept me in the fat power band. I was shifting at 6k so that I could take advantage of the torque. quick shifting and short gears allowed me to hang decently.
Doty's car was still badass anyway you slice it. He put several lengths on a car that trapped 109.43 mph in the 1/4. On higher boost he should have been trapping 115ish. I'd say that night it would have been 112-113.
Carry on bench racers.
The STi had Utec with my own map. I was sponsored by a shop with a mustang dyno at the time so I had plenty of time to tune it on a nice conservative map which was setup for massive torque and mild HP.
Engine Management
Header
Ported Exhaust housing
Turbo-back
Water injection
K&N filter
304 whp 358 lbs tq on 17 PSI
The short gearing of the STI is what helped. I had probably around 100 passes at the local track and found my optimal shift points which kept me in the fat power band. I was shifting at 6k so that I could take advantage of the torque. quick shifting and short gears allowed me to hang decently.
Doty's car was still badass anyway you slice it. He put several lengths on a car that trapped 109.43 mph in the 1/4. On higher boost he should have been trapping 115ish. I'd say that night it would have been 112-113.
Carry on bench racers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM