T04S Turbo II vs. 330whp STi (Video)
Ok www.yousendit.com but you might have to keep reposting it. I hate those streaming sites..... lag city and you can't enjoy it on the road either.
Heres another link for those that wanted to see it:
http://s79.photobucket.com/albums/j1...y_vs_BDoty.flv
http://s79.photobucket.com/albums/j1...y_vs_BDoty.flv
Originally Posted by kabooski
4rth gear is where you build the most load
hence your probly going lean... add more fuel 6-8 RPM or in the 13-17 PSI range
start with 2% and see what the wideband reads
hence your probly going lean... add more fuel 6-8 RPM or in the 13-17 PSI range
start with 2% and see what the wideband reads
But it was only running 12psi in the video.
Last edited by BDoty311; Apr 2, 2007 at 01:15 PM.
wow you should have raped him dude... wtf was wrong with your car? Even at 12 psi you should have killed him based on power to weight ratio and the fact that you have the advantage on a roll with rwd...
Well, you guys can imagine all you want, but I assure you the car was running great at the time. The first race he jumped the gun alittle bit.
If you consider that its a huge laggy turbo in the RX-7 and a small quick spooling turbo in a STi with 360wtq, it makes more sense. (Especially from a 30mph roll in 2nd gear) He pulls some length at the beginning and I continue to pull after that.
And I like how all of you guys first assume that something was messed up with my car and not that his car is damn fast.
If you consider that its a huge laggy turbo in the RX-7 and a small quick spooling turbo in a STi with 360wtq, it makes more sense. (Especially from a 30mph roll in 2nd gear) He pulls some length at the beginning and I continue to pull after that.
And I like how all of you guys first assume that something was messed up with my car and not that his car is damn fast.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
well then he has more then 330whp. it just does not make sense to me, you should have been at least at 330whp at 12 psi so it would be no contest at 800 lbs or so less. id give credit but something does not add up. either he had more power or you had less. in 3rd gear you should have pulled car lengths ahead...
Originally Posted by smg944
well then he has more then 330whp. it just does not make sense to me, you should have been at least at 330whp at 12 psi so it would be no contest at 800 lbs or so less. id give credit but something does not add up. either he had more power or you had less. in 3rd gear you should have pulled car lengths ahead...
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
stock turbo 2 test weight is around 2700. i know an evo weighs just under 3400 test weight. im not postive on the sti but it should be around 3500 lbs or so. here is the curb weight for both the evo and sti.
http://www.scoobyblog.com/2006-02-13...preza-wrx-sti/
so even if its 700 lbs. still doesnt make sense. even if you only had 300whp at the time he would need at least 360whp to keep up. do the math.
http://www.scoobyblog.com/2006-02-13...preza-wrx-sti/
so even if its 700 lbs. still doesnt make sense. even if you only had 300whp at the time he would need at least 360whp to keep up. do the math.
The math doesn't matter!
You are seriously bench racing. With street tires and 12psi I was trapping at 114-115mph, at 15psi the previous owner trapped at 122mph.
Anyways, I'm not going to get into a lame *** arguement about a race that happened some 2 years ago.
BTW - A stock 88 Turbo II probably weighs around 2,800lbs atleast. STIs weigh around 3,300-3,400lbs.
You are seriously bench racing. With street tires and 12psi I was trapping at 114-115mph, at 15psi the previous owner trapped at 122mph.
Anyways, I'm not going to get into a lame *** arguement about a race that happened some 2 years ago.
BTW - A stock 88 Turbo II probably weighs around 2,800lbs atleast. STIs weigh around 3,300-3,400lbs.
Originally Posted by ITS N STI
You will never get to them, they think P:W > all
btw, this is trevor on kcsr
btw, this is trevor on kcsr


