ls1 killed, sort of..

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 04:48 AM
  #1  
bennyess's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: melbourne, australia
Talking ls1 killed, sort of..

my house mate has a '00 ls1 berlina(commodore) with intake,cam, injectors,ls2 manifold, putting out 350rwhp and monster torque plus stage 2 shift etc. anyway he absolutley destroys me off the line, traction hard with the teins and 18's. but from anywhere else i'll beat him to the speed liniter @ 180 kph. anyway always good fun to remind him that my ride was cheaper and still gets better fuel economy.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #2  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Your car gets better gas mileage than his?
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #3  
GStypeR's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: dallas
haha, about the gas milage..........

nice kill btw..
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #4  
bennyess's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: melbourne, australia
he cant keep his foot out of the wall, his injectors are 650cc and it runs a bit rich too
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 03:34 AM
  #5  
Tanjo's Avatar
Royale with cheese
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, by way of Poulsbo, WA
Wait wait wait. He has EIGHT 650cc injectors? No way. You have to mean 65 lb/hr or something. ( I dont really know how much that would be, but it sounds WAY more feasible than 650cc's....)
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #6  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
65 lb/hr is basically 650cc.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #7  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Why the hell would he have 65lbs/hr injectors? If he does, he's supporting a lot more hp than you are. For my mods on my LS1, I needed 42lbs/hr, and that's for over 500hp, so if he's got 65lbs/hr, then he must be way up there.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #8  
Rathmar's Avatar
Reppin' the Burbs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: Tottenham, Ontario
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Why the hell would he have 65lbs/hr injectors? If he does, he's supporting a lot more hp than you are. For my mods on my LS1, I needed 42lbs/hr, and that's for over 500hp, so if he's got 65lbs/hr, then he must be way up there.
He did say it was running a little rich
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #9  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
I car sat (for a deploying buddy) a bone stock LS1 Camaro for 6 month, and put about 500 miles on it.

Thats not allot, but I checked the gas mileage several times, and it was about exactly what I am getting now in my 13b-rew powered FC.

About 19-20 MPG avg, I drive exactly the same in both cars.


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Your car gets better gas mileage than his?
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #10  
bennyess's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: melbourne, australia
he has plans for a charger but, if he ever gets there is another question, i'll have my ecu,fmic,fuel system and t04z before he has his blown, and i'll still beat him.
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 04:25 AM
  #11  
dumpsterdriver's Avatar
junkyard turbo
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: south bend indiana
the lsx engines are *vastly* more efficient than rotaries.. they really are neat motors.. id go so far as to call the ls1 the best engine design in history, overall is debatable, but in its class it is absolutely unmatched imo. make fun of its pushrods all you want, it does everything and does it all well.


.....and personally, i see no excuse for a 1.3 engine making 180hp to be getting the same mileage as a 5.7 making power in the 300's..



Old Jan 18, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
habu2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
+1 - although I'd qualify it and say "the best production engine design"
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #13  
Eat-Pez's Avatar
Pretty as a $20 whore
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by dumpsterdriver
the lsx engines are *vastly* more efficient than rotaries.. they really are neat motors.. id go so far as to call the ls1 the best engine design in history, overall is debatable, but in its class it is absolutely unmatched imo. make fun of its pushrods all you want, it does everything and does it all well.


.....and personally, i see no excuse for a 1.3 engine making 180hp to be getting the same mileage as a 5.7 making power in the 300's..



Yup, excellent motor.

And for the guy that got the same gas mileage in his RX7 as the Fbody, remember, the Camaro is lugging around 1000lbs more *** too.

And 65lb injectors are a bit much for a bolton motor. Stockers are good to atleast 450hp, and they're 26-28lb. I'd say he'd be running a bit rich too. I've ran smaller injectors on supercharged engines before.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
Einheri
Single Turbo RX-7's
14
Oct 7, 2015 12:23 PM
Rbkouki
V-8 Powered RX-7's
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.