General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

turbulence for intake good? bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #1  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
turbulence for intake good? bad?

I am in the process of building myself a custom intake for my 87 TII. I've had a few people tell me that turbulence is good for an intake because it will cause the air to move faster so this means the more bends the better. I personally think the less bends the better air flow there will be. Who is correct?
Thanks,
Anthony
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #2  
seandizzie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: fwb.florida
I think it has something to do with mixing air with the fuel and spreading out in the combustion chamber for an even burn, not sure though.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #3  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by seandizzie
I think it has something to do with mixing air with the fuel and spreading out in the combustion chamber for an even burn, not sure though.
That makes since..... i think ur right?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #4  
telum01's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Grovetown, Ga
yes, a little turbulation can help the mixing of the air and fuel. imagine pouring two different liquids into a blender. they kinda swirl around and they do mix a little, but that's it. then turn the blender on. that's what the turbulence is for.

the thing to remember on your project is that a little turbulence is good, but a bunch of **** blocking the airflow to make that turbulence is bad.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #5  
jgrewe's Avatar
GET OFF MY LAWN
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 2
From: Fla.
The fewer bends that you can get the runner lengths you want the better. The ideal intake tract would be a straight tube that gets smaller in diameter as it gets closer to the port.

The turbulence many speak of is a way of creating an 'air bearing' for the high velocity air in the center area of the tube to move easier. There are other tricks but in your design I'd just worry about Helmholz resonance and making sure you don't go too big in runner size.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 02:17 AM
  #6  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by jgrewe
There are other tricks but in your design I'd just worry about Helmholz resonance and making sure you don't go too big in runner size.
okay, bear with me here a bit. i understand Helmholz resonance as it applies to sound, and maybe i just need some sleep, but i'm having a bit of trouble wrapping my mind around how it applies to the intake design. can you help me out a bit?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.