General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

turbulence for intake good? bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-06, 09:10 PM
  #1  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
turbulence for intake good? bad?

I am in the process of building myself a custom intake for my 87 TII. I've had a few people tell me that turbulence is good for an intake because it will cause the air to move faster so this means the more bends the better. I personally think the less bends the better air flow there will be. Who is correct?
Thanks,
Anthony
Old 11-20-06, 11:04 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
seandizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: fwb.florida
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think it has something to do with mixing air with the fuel and spreading out in the combustion chamber for an even burn, not sure though.
Old 11-20-06, 02:26 PM
  #3  
Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
rx7 SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by seandizzie
I think it has something to do with mixing air with the fuel and spreading out in the combustion chamber for an even burn, not sure though.
That makes since..... i think ur right?
Old 11-22-06, 08:44 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
telum01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grovetown, Ga
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, a little turbulation can help the mixing of the air and fuel. imagine pouring two different liquids into a blender. they kinda swirl around and they do mix a little, but that's it. then turn the blender on. that's what the turbulence is for.

the thing to remember on your project is that a little turbulence is good, but a bunch of **** blocking the airflow to make that turbulence is bad.
Old 11-22-06, 09:28 PM
  #5  
GET OFF MY LAWN

iTrader: (1)
 
jgrewe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fla.
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The fewer bends that you can get the runner lengths you want the better. The ideal intake tract would be a straight tube that gets smaller in diameter as it gets closer to the port.

The turbulence many speak of is a way of creating an 'air bearing' for the high velocity air in the center area of the tube to move easier. There are other tricks but in your design I'd just worry about Helmholz resonance and making sure you don't go too big in runner size.
Old 11-24-06, 02:17 AM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,822
Received 307 Likes on 268 Posts
Originally Posted by jgrewe
There are other tricks but in your design I'd just worry about Helmholz resonance and making sure you don't go too big in runner size.
okay, bear with me here a bit. i understand Helmholz resonance as it applies to sound, and maybe i just need some sleep, but i'm having a bit of trouble wrapping my mind around how it applies to the intake design. can you help me out a bit?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
02-26-21 10:12 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
08-17-15 11:50 PM



Quick Reply: turbulence for intake good? bad?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.