General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

sequential to non sequential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-08, 02:03 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bsj44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Granada Hills
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CA sequential to non sequential

Is there any advantage switching from sequential to non sequential? If so, how do you do it.
Old 01-24-08, 02:07 PM
  #2  
cp1
Full Member
 
cp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im still working on my conversion... but the way i see is no more transition period combined with a much cleaner engine bay. it really is much more simplified. the reason its taking me so long is i dont have that much time to devote to it and im really finnicky about things so ive taken time to really do things right. Plus i see the added benefit that if something goes wrong i dont have to spend weeks diagnosing the problem.

this link here seems to be the best reference so far.

http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/3r...ov_nonseq.html
Old 02-13-08, 10:24 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (16)
 
93RedDragonFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bsj44
Is there any advantage switching from sequential to non sequential? If so, how do you do it.
Power wise there isnt really a difference takes a little longer for the turbo's to spool and they both hit at once, kind of like having a single. You wont really notice a difference driving around town, but when you get one it you will. Also free's up more room in the engine bay and makes the car easier to work on. And my personal favorite NO More Rats Nest, you'll only have like 6 vaccume lines. It really all boils down to prefrence, and if you have the time, patients, and money to do it. Hope that helps.

-Zach
Old 02-13-08, 10:51 PM
  #4  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,182
Received 507 Likes on 349 Posts
The only advantage is that it is easier to troubleshoot since there are less vacuum lines and solenoids.

The disadvantage is much less torque and power under 4000 RPMs and not being able to pass smog.
Old 02-14-08, 09:41 PM
  #5  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,892
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Besides a cleaner setup under the UIM there is a power increase if:

If you do the seq conversion 100% instead of the normal 80% like most due, you will make more power past 4000 rpm due to less exhaust back pressure. This requires using a Dremel or die grinder on the exhaust manifold and turbo housing ports.

Then if you bump the boost up to at lease 15psi, you will make more power across the whole rpm band than the stock engine.
350whp non-seq is always stronger than any stock engine! Then the low rpm turbo lag is a mute point.

There have been many discussions on this in the FD forum. Go find them!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
02-27-21 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
10-04-15 08:47 PM
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
10-01-15 07:58 PM



Quick Reply: sequential to non sequential



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.