Engine Management Forum Use this area for discussing Haltech, Wolf 3D, Power FC, AEM and any other aftermarket ECU upgrades. Help/Questions/Tuning

Tuning question: dyno vs open road

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2002 | 08:32 AM
  #1  
twokrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need more sleep
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Woodlands TX
Tuning question: dyno vs open road

Using different widebands, one for street and another for dynojet inertial dyno, we are getting about a 0.3 AFR difference, with the dyno reading rich as compared to the road. Anyone else experience this? Is this to be expected due to the lower load with the dyno as compared to the street?

I have read threads on this forum about this topic but do not recall anyone mentioning the difference. Folks have mentioned to tune rich on the dyno and then expect it to run leaner on the street, looking for data.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2002 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
This seems like a dumb suggestion, but why not eliminate a variable and use the same wideband on both?

Brian
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2002 | 12:55 PM
  #3  
AJatx's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Temperature can play a part in the differences if you are using the same wideband sensor. There is a correction map for temperature and barometric pressure.

Also, you tune rich so you take into consideration uncontrolled variables like different grades/quality of pump gas and temperature variations.

J
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2002 | 02:38 PM
  #4  
twokrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need more sleep
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Woodlands TX
Thanks for the critique?

I was hoping for some data ...
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 05:21 AM
  #5  
twokrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need more sleep
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Woodlands TX
Gordon,

You say you add fuel when intake temps go over 15 deg? My maps remove fuel as intake temps rise, ignition retards as well. I have been considering altering this logic a bit given the useless intake air temp sensor/location on the third gen. The sensor seems to measure intake manifold temp instead of intake air temp. Still debating relocating the sensor.

Kyle
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 07:07 AM
  #6  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
For street tuning, nothing is going to be better than tuning on the street. Kinda hard to have a fan pushing 70-130mph winds! Providing you have all critical gauges like fuel pressure, oil pressure, water temp. and of course a nice wide band.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 08:18 AM
  #7  
sokudo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: japan
if you use the proper dyno it will make a huge difference. we use a dyno pack and it can simulate many different load situations unlike a roller dyno.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 09:41 AM
  #8  
Jim Swantko's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Pockyville
Another reason for the difference is that actual loading of the motor.

On the street will put more load on the motor hence making it run a bit leaner. Spool charactaristics will vary a bit too... with boost coming on sooner on the road than the dyno.

I'd say tune it on the dyno first... then the road. Keep a wideband in your car all the time for safety. Things change pretty dramatically from day to day... especially season to season.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 07:24 PM
  #9  
Maxthe7man's Avatar
Freedoms worth a buck o'5
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
I have to agree that aeaodynamic forces are missing from the dyno as well, but a dyno is nice for holding constants which is hard to do on the street, but it can be done, I am fortunate to have some very long hills climbs to drive up, thats where cruise control comes nice as well, set it at 3000, hit the hill and tune away, then hit it again at 3500, yada yada yada..
As for the discrepency, that could be anything from the supply voltage of the wideband controller, right down where the sensors were mounted, and what the intake air temps of the engine were..Max
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 06:50 PM
  #10  
Badog's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
Badog's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Originally posted by twokrx7
Gordon,

You say you add fuel when intake temps go over 15 deg? My maps remove fuel as intake temps rise, ignition retards as well. I have been considering altering this logic a bit given the useless intake air temp sensor/location on the third gen. The sensor seems to measure intake manifold temp instead of intake air temp. Still debating relocating the sensor.

Kyle
Relocate the air sensor like Nocab and I did.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Jan 11, 2016 04:08 PM
stickmantijuana
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 21, 2015 08:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.