Fun Fast and Reliable FC.

Old Nov 1, 2012 | 10:03 AM
  #26  
mikerbike's Avatar
Dreamin' of Rotary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by LIMON
well, think about how 'competitive' that Corvette would have been against the FD of the FD had a four rotor engine. Just a thought.
Oh hell yeah! And at only 4x the price, TOTALLY WORTH IT! Just another thought.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 12:03 PM
  #27  
REAmemiya_fan's Avatar
Passion for Racing
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 2
From: Crown Point, Indiana
Take money out of the equation. When it comes to racing, if you have to ask, you can't afford it. Really simple concept.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 01:57 PM
  #28  
mikerbike's Avatar
Dreamin' of Rotary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Utah
I didn't ask how much 4 rotors cost. That information is available on the internet.

Equation - Money = Dreaming
Driving 120hp car > Dreaming about a 500hp car.

/Opinion
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 09:17 PM
  #29  
FC3S Murray's Avatar
5 and counting.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 4
From: Montana
Originally Posted by mikerbike
Oh hell yeah! And at only 4x the price, TOTALLY WORTH IT! Just another thought.


Lol. You nailed it
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #30  
REAmemiya_fan's Avatar
Passion for Racing
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 2
From: Crown Point, Indiana
Originally Posted by mikerbike
I didn't ask how much 4 rotors cost. That information is available on the internet.

Equation - Money = Dreaming
Driving 120hp car > Dreaming about a 500hp car.

/Opinion
Alright even though I agree, the fact is racing is all about advancement in technology as much as it is about the entertainment. Yes, it costs stupid amounts of money, but the fact still is, Mazda created an engine that was 2.6L, made over 700 naturally aspirated horsepower to the wheels, ran reliably for 24 hours straight, and is still in use today for demos. Mazda also had the most wins for around 8-10 years in any road racing around the world with a rotary engine, all naturally aspirated. Whether it be IMSA GTU, GTO, racing at Bathurst, Rallying, Le Mans. If they would have kept the FD in a racing situation, then I have no doubt they would have kicked *** too. Lets even look at the Rolex series, this was the last year for the three rotor RX-8's, and they kicked *** almost every year they've been in the series.

I don't care what you think your car is, unless it is dedicated to a class in a series, it is not a race car. You have a street car for the road. And don't bring up drifting, because that is something completely different. That FD in the video I posted is an example of what I'm talking about. And while we're on the subject, it doesn't always take that kind of money to build that car, we have many people such as John Huijben to thank for that. He doesn't have all the money that proper race teams have, and he's built all his stuff to be just as quality at I bet a fraction of the cost. That is why it annoys me to no end when people say cost vs power bullshit. Put in the work, and you'll get the results.

So to the OP, don't let anyone discourage you. to anyone who says you can't do something, I have a friend who bases his whole build off of saying **** you to the people who say you can't do something.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:11 PM
  #31  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
Originally Posted by REAmemiya_fan
Take money out of the equation. When it comes to racing, if you have to ask, you can't afford it. Really simple concept.
Oh pshaw, even Jim Glickenhaus has a budget.
For the majority of racers, racing is primarily about money- how to get it and what to spend it on.

"If you have to ask, you can't afford it" is a cliche that doesn't work in this context.
I can assure you that more race efforts have failed because the principle(s) didn't ask ahead of time and were overwhelmed by the hidden costs of racing.

On a more prosaic level, racers constantly balance the desire for performance upgrades against requirements like tires. Is the killer motor really a good idea if you can't afford good rubber?

Money makes the world go round and smart money management is just as important to the race world as it is to Wall St.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #32  
turbotim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
I am pretty sure the corvette swap is more expensive than my swap but I could be wrong, and yes I already know my weight distribution is f!@#ed, but I built it to be a sleeper and a straight line car. All I really have to do to it is put a good set of tires on it and maybe a better transmission and this car will run in the 11's on those stock usdm turbos.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 09:11 AM
  #33  
missilerex's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Portland
You just bolt good tires to it, you're trans will never be the weak Point.... it will be the diff and axles you grenade every time you attempt a launch...

And ls isn't more or less expensive of a swap, either way if you're not Building the mounts or doing wiring. Yourself. Then break out the pocket book and bend over

Have you looked into the price of a single snail swap on a jz? Costs what it will to get just the motor in the car lmao
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 01:07 PM
  #34  
turbotim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
missilerex;11340621]You just bolt good tires to it, you're trans will never be the weak Point.... it will be the diff and axles you grenade every time you attempt a launch...
The trans is notchy and slow to shift, that is a common problem with r154, I have tried several different oils, the oil that seems to work the best is that redline mt 90, but its still a little bit notchy, if I could speed up the shifting I could knock a fair bit of the time. also I did break the factory diff, its in my video, lol, I swapped it out for a ford 8.8 with a 3:27 gear ratio, the 2j likes them taller gears thats for sure.



And ls isn't more or less expensive of a swap, either way if you're not Building the mounts or doing wiring. Yourself. Then break out the pocket book and bend over
I agree if your paying for labor, but I am not, I am also not going to be buying one of those 5k turbo kits either, probly going to piece it together go with a comp turbo and a log manifold, I already have a fuel rail and injectors, the fuel pump is already upgraded. I am probly going to cheap out on tuning and use an apexi safc with upgraded map sensor. the car already has a water meth injection kit and when the new turbo set up goes on I will up size the meth jet.



Have you looked into the price of a single snail swap on a jz? Costs what it will to get just the motor in the car lmao
bottom line is I am going to do it on a tight a buget as possible.
but for now I am going to leave the stock usdm turbos on it and try n improve the e/t with tires n maybe a different tranny.

Last edited by turbotim; Jan 10, 2013 at 01:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #35  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by REAmemiya_fan
Mazda created an engine that was 2.6L, made over 700 naturally aspirated horsepower to the wheels, WITH AN INTAKE RESTRICTOR, ran reliably for 24 hours straight, and then was refreshed and ran for 20 years, and got refreshed again in 2011, and WENT BACK RACING.
the 787B is an impressive car, its like a truck. it hasn't been restored, the exterior is circa 1991, the engine was pulled apart measured for wear and put back together, and then they just recently rebuilt the engine again, and sent it back out to go vintage racing, without the intake restrictor!

it was neat in 2011 we got to see the 787 vs the silk cut Jaguars on the race track...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 07:22 PM
  #36  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
jeez ... cut the man some slack. respect his thread. it's a good project that can turn out to be a great project. the 2JZ is a formidable engine. period. the rotary vs. piston argument is pointless, as is the LSx vs. whatever else. this is the engine HE chose for his car and it sounds like it makes him happy. if we may all be so lucky ....

the only issues i see here are that the thread is in the wrong section and that it doesn't take the typical format of a "build thread" since it's just a slide show and short video.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 07:25 PM
  #37  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
the 787B is an impressive car ...
so far the understatement of the year.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 05:48 PM
  #38  
turbotim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0

did another video of my car, havent done any thing further with this car yet, as my supra took most of my attention this last summer.

I was thinking of Frankensteining it a little farther with a pair of 14b turbos off of a dsm. then my creation will be as complete as can be for a Frankenstein car.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2013 | 01:37 PM
  #39  
Ionix's Avatar
New to rotary,loving it
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: bakersfield CA.
awesome
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
TwentyDW
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Sep 2, 2015 06:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.