eage8's SSM/HPDE FC Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 06:20 PM
  #851  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by eage8
So I'm going back to using the 3.5" -> 2.5" cobra head coupler. it'll be better than the shorty filter.

I lined it up next to the shorty filter and it's a bit longer which would explain why it rubbed a bit when I test fit it before:




so I trimmed a little bit off of it and it fits pretty well (you can also see how messed up the filter is getting from my squeezing it on and off again lol):







Then I took the radiator out because I'm done test fitting things... I forgot how quick this car comes apart

Full race sells a billet bov cover with a 1/8npt port and 90 degree fitting. I believe this would give you more clearance vs the plastic barb that sticks straight out. That 7670 has a 3.5 in inlet, is the 3.5 inch cobra elbow any smaller ?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 08:45 PM
  #852  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by Turblown
Full race sells a billet bov cover with a 1/8npt port and 90 degree fitting. I believe this would give you more clearance vs the plastic barb that sticks straight out. That 7670 has a 3.5 in inlet, is the 3.5 inch cobra elbow any smaller ?
I'm currently running the turbosmart recirc valve which is even worse, but the problem isn't really with the bov cover (if it was I would have just blocked it off entirely which I thought about).

The problem with the 4" cobra head was I didn't have clearance between the inlet and the actual bov housing casting on the cover because the rubber coupler + spacer was just much too big. if I had an 8376 it actually might work out (because they have a 4" inlet).

(there was also the problem where the 4" cobra head also hit on everything else because the 4" exit is giant... but I could never actually get it positioned well enough to see how well it would work out because of the compressor cover issues.)

The problem I'm having is there aren't any 3.5" -> 3.5" cobra couplers. just 4" and 3". the only 3.5" one steps down to 2.5" intake hose (which is what I'll be using, at least for next season).
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 11:05 AM
  #853  
rotaryextreme's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 493
From: Stockton, CA
wow, im really impressed with all your work. My new vm has even more clearance since I redid the frame. So this turbo should be easier to fit an intake on. Awesome work. Happy Holidays.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 02:15 PM
  #854  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Big longshot, but does the 7670 still fit in the FC if you flip the Turblown cast manifold over so the straight runner is in the rear like stock FC manifold?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 02:21 PM
  #855  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Big longshot, but does the 7670 still fit in the FC if you flip the Turblown cast manifold over so the straight runner is in the rear like stock FC manifold?
I thought about that, the t4 flange on the manifold is at about a 45* angle to the engine mounting flange, which would but the turbo much further down than it is now so it would end up in the frame rail.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 06:52 PM
  #856  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by rotaryextreme
wow, im really impressed with all your work. My new vm has even more clearance since I redid the frame. So this turbo should be easier to fit an intake on. Awesome work. Happy Holidays.
Nice !
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 11:14 PM
  #857  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
So this is where I'm going to go with this intake as of now.

3.5" -> 2.5" cobra head
to
60* 2.5" elbow
to
2.5" -> 6" velocity stack

I plan on putting a nice big 6" flanged K&N filter on it. it looks like a 7" long filter will fit. Looking at the K&N filters that are that size I think I'll probably start with a RF-1042.







Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 11:43 AM
  #858  
rotorhead_izzy's Avatar
Stewiefied Racing CEO
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 24
From: Kenosha area, WI
I like how it looks
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 02:50 PM
  #859  
MaczPayne's Avatar
Mac Attack
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 22
From: California
Did you make the velocity stack?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 03:11 PM
  #860  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by MaczPayne
Did you make the velocity stack?
it's a vibrant velocity stack:

Vibrant Performance ::.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 11:53 PM
  #861  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by eage8
got some stuff done tonight.

first, I weighed the new exhaust:


coated divorced wastegate downpipe is 11.6 lbs.
the rest of the exhaust is 20.2 lbs.

totaling 31.8 lbs. over 41 lbs lighter than my old 3" racing beat exhaust.




Removed the new 3.5" downpipe and weighed it. 7.8 lbs.

so 3.8 lbs lighter than the old downpipe and the complete exhaust is now down to 28.0 lbs
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 11:59 PM
  #862  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
I also test fit a water pump block off for the new davies craig electric water pump:



and assembled the first part of the new fuel system, a 1.5L fuel surge tank with a new walbro 400 E85 fuel pump.


Last edited by eage8; Jan 11, 2016 at 08:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 11:16 AM
  #863  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Finally got the rule clarification back from the scca:

#18364 SM eligibility inquiry
Per the SMAC, the 1986-1991 Mazda RX7 2+2 meets the requirements for the SM class and is thus allowed to compete in Street Modified.

That in addition to this rule:
16.1.K. Rear passenger seat(s), including restraints and associated hardware may be removed.

and the fact that all the things that make my car a turboII are free to change in SM means I can run in street modified instead of super street modified. So I can avoid FDs and other crazy 2 seat cars
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 11:44 AM
  #864  
rotorhead_izzy's Avatar
Stewiefied Racing CEO
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 24
From: Kenosha area, WI
Originally Posted by eage8
Finally got the rule clarification back from the scca:

#18364 SM eligibility inquiry
Per the SMAC, the 1986-1991 Mazda RX7 2+2 meets the requirements for the SM class and is thus allowed to compete in Street Modified.

That in addition to this rule:
16.1.K. Rear passenger seat(s), including restraints and associated hardware may be removed.

and the fact that all the things that make my car a turboII are free to change in SM means I can run in street modified instead of super street modified. So I can avoid FDs and other crazy 2 seat cars
Now we have to just deal with gtr's and what not. Lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #865  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Or if anyone could be bothered to build an RX-8 for SM.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 05:01 PM
  #866  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
finally some progress:

got the engine out of the car:



just FYI, stage 8 locking fasteners aren't going to work without some modifications



This is what they're supposed to look like, the tap clips onto the nut with a circlip and prevents it from backing out:




My buddy with a flywheel wrench is currently snowed in (we got ~30" of snow over the weekend) so I have to wait to take the engine all the way apart. but looking into the rear exhaust port I see this which is odd, any ideas what might have left that streak?


Reply
Old Jan 26, 2016 | 10:07 AM
  #867  
95maxrider's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
From: Herndon, VA
Damn Mike, you so crazy.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2016 | 09:22 PM
  #868  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Hey man, I am not sure how far away you are from NOVA, but I have an electric impact gun, and correct socket for the flywheel nut. You are more than welcome to use it!

BTW - You got me attention with the electric water pump setup, keep us posted on it.

PS - No idea about that streak
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 12:39 AM
  #869  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
The streak looks like where the chrome is worn down to the steel liner (and I hope I am wrong!).
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 04:12 AM
  #870  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
That's an odd angle for a wear pattern. Interested to see what it looks like once you unbutton the engine.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 11:23 PM
  #871  
moneymaker42141983's Avatar
ALL THING ROTARY NUT
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: mt airy MD
Nice to see your still at it with the car man. If you need anything you know where I am. How did the FD upper work for you?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 10:49 AM
  #872  
eage8's Avatar
Thread Starter
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
So I got the engine apart.



Everything looks relatively fine, except the apex seal wear.... Here is a picture of an apex seal from the front rotor (on the left) and two from the rear rotor (middle and right). they're worn significantly. it looks like they're only worn on 1 side? (the inner side without the triangle piece). They also have rough corners length-wise, I assume due to the wearing...

The white steak I saw through the exhaust port was a white chalky substance... not sure what it was, but there was some in the exhaust manifold too. I imagine the apex seal wasn't wiping it off due to the odd wear on them (that's the side of the housing with the apex seal wear)




I checked for dents in the rotor... and there is nothing significant, there are some corners where I can see a bit of light through with a straight edge, but I'm not too concerned with it. I also tested the apex seal slot wear and it's between .0025 and .003 which is well within spec.

So currently I think I'm just going to throw some new seals in it (OEM mazda this time), new water seals (pineapple racing) and call it a day.

Here are some pictures of the rest of the engine:




rear housing





front housing





rear iron














Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 11:51 AM
  #873  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
What apex seals were you using?
Is the exhaust ported?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 12:08 PM
  #874  
IAN's Avatar
IAN
Rotary Reborn!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 9
From: Canada
Very clean rotors. How many KM's? Here is mine after 1000km. No idea what happened. After which I more or less rebuilt it and then just let the car sit for lack of time and tired of using vacation and my free time on her
Attached Thumbnails eage8's SSM/HPDE FC Turbo-p1030695.jpg   eage8's SSM/HPDE FC Turbo-p1030697.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #875  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Very nice!
Glad everything looks in good shape besides the apex seals.

Never had that weird apex seal wear (different height across the length of seal). Could it be the apex seal springs got seated weird on the rear rotor with the short spring pushed out of its land and up onto the long spring's outer land? Maybe this caused that side of the apex seal to resist being pushed into the rotor slot and so excessive wear.

You might see something on the backside of the apex seals where the springs rub.

White chalky sounds like burned coolant or water wetter to me.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.