Build Threads
Sponsored by:

6 Port Turbo Build and Help Ticket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-11, 06:17 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Smile 6 Port Turbo Build and Help Ticket

Alright Folks its time for me to get serious in my build. I am trying to gather as many information as possible everyday spending hours reading and burning my cornea. I have seen how some build threads in here and as well as Aaron Cakes build. Creativity is not something i have like most of the people in here does. Coming To the point.

Car - 1987 Mazda RX7 GXL
Goal 300WHP to 320WHP at least

When I Bought on Aug 2011



As For Now






The only thing i have completed is Suspension. The car is in excellent running condition. I ONLY Drive this thing in the summer. I wont be touching this engine for the build. i have an engine that i pulled from junkyard is in pretty good condition and everything is apart. According to my reasearch this build will cost me atleast $10000. Below is the list of things i think i want go with. you can correct me if somthing doesnt below were it supposed to be.
The car that i pulled the engine showed 245K Miles, but the inside doesnt look like it.

I really dont want to cheap out on this but dont want to spend too much

1. Does Getting the Irons Lapped/Nitrated Significant?
2. New Housing - Nothing Wrong with the old ones
2. Atkin Master Rotary Engine Rebuild Kit
3. S5 TII LIM/UIM - Port Match
4. Turbo is really hard for me to choose - i was thinking of these - http://himni-racing.com/index.php?ma...oducts_id=1729
dont know if that is an overkill - is the header/turbo interfere with the frame since the kit is for a TII.
5. For a standalone Haltech Platinum Sprint RE OR Haltech E6X - still dont know which one.
6. Walbro 255LPH
7. RC Engineering - 750CC & 1600CC
8. Aeromotive FPR
9. Light weight Flywheel - ACT?
Looking for a very very clean setup - No Emsission, Not Lot of hoses,wires. i know u cannot avoid all of them
Thinking of keeping the OMP just because i think it is real functional device that mazda put in there. i will be keeping PS and A/C

I know there is a million stuff that i forgot.

People Please feel free to add on stuff in here that help me to accomplish my goal.
Old 12-04-11, 12:37 AM
  #2  
Junior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
philvia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: quartz hill, CA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For 300hp just re-seal the engine with that atkins kit, I think the fuel setup is a little overkill, you dont need or want 1600cc injectors unless you want to make more power later. You can get a way smaller turbo thats less laggy to make that power as well like a gt35r or a 60-1. ACT makes great products so their flywheel and clutch will be great. E6X will do nicely as well. For the most part your plans are pretty spot on though just keep it simple and keep the turbo size down because responsive cars are way fun
Old 12-04-11, 05:22 PM
  #3  
Full Member
 
Rotary Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hella clean car, respect
Old 12-04-11, 05:27 PM
  #4  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
GT40 is way overkill for your aim, even a GT35R is a bit overboard. you could easily hit your mark with a hybrid turbo which doesn't require all the extra expenses of the manifold and wastegate as well as custom downpipe.
Old 12-04-11, 08:43 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by philvia
For 300hp just re-seal the engine with that atkins kit, I think the fuel setup is a little overkill, you dont need or want 1600cc injectors unless you want to make more power later. You can get a way smaller turbo thats less laggy to make that power as well like a gt35r or a 60-1. ACT makes great products so their flywheel and clutch will be great. E6X will do nicely as well. For the most part your plans are pretty spot on though just keep it simple and keep the turbo size down because responsive cars are way fun
thanks for the reply man, i was also looking at the ID'd but they dont come cheap. any recomendation for injectors?
Old 12-04-11, 08:45 PM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
GT40 is way overkill for your aim, even a GT35R is a bit overboard. you could easily hit your mark with a hybrid turbo which doesn't require all the extra expenses of the manifold and wastegate as well as custom downpipe.
i c ur point. but either way a stock TII Manifold/turbo is going to interfere with my frame right?
Old 12-04-11, 08:45 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Terror
Hella clean car, respect
thank . at first i hated that color. now i love it. lol
Old 12-04-11, 09:06 PM
  #8  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by R-X-R
i c ur point. but either way a stock TII Manifold/turbo is going to interfere with my frame right?
only the n/a lower intake. most people port the TII LIM to work.
Old 12-05-11, 08:37 AM
  #9  
Trunk Ornament

iTrader: (11)
 
AGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
http://aaroncake.net/RX-7/4PortLIMTo6Port.htm

That's what you'll want to do. You get to keep the high compression 6 port block, and the TII intake manifold, exhaust manifold, and turbo all fit properly. Send a turbo out to Brian at BNR supercars and get a hybrid for your power goals. I don't have any experience with Haltech, but from what I've seen, the E6k is pretty primitive and limited to what it can do. I bought a megasquirt kit and built it myself for around $400, and the options are almost limitless.
Old 12-05-11, 01:58 PM
  #10  
This sh*t burns oil!

iTrader: (7)
 
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC - USA
Posts: 1,239
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Like karack said, that turbo is WAY overkill for 300-320whp. A BNR stage 3 or stage 4 with a full 3" turbo would spool decent and allow you to retain the stock turbo manifold, which mean nice easy bolt on parts.

The injector combo you mention is a good bit more than you need, but will give you breathing room in the future.

Instead of a walboro I would get a nicer unit with similar flow, think bosch or aeromotive. You're talking about doing a high c/r turbo setup and an engine that already picky, dont risk it on a cheaper pump in your fuel system.

An atkins rebuild kit will be just fine, you could get the rotary aviation kit, which has very durable apex seals. It is however, at the expensive of your rotor housings.

On the flywheel side of things thats your pick, the mazda unit works but kills engine response. Lightweight flywheels will require the use of an ATX rear counterweight. Throw away your non turbo drivetrain and put the Tii stuff in there, its much more durable and its worth it.
Old 12-05-11, 03:55 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by AGreen
http://aaroncake.net/RX-7/4PortLIMTo6Port.htm

That's what you'll want to do. You get to keep the high compression 6 port block, and the TII intake manifold, exhaust manifold, and turbo all fit properly. Send a turbo out to Brian at BNR supercars and get a hybrid for your power goals. I don't have any experience with Haltech, but from what I've seen, the E6k is pretty primitive and limited to what it can do. I bought a megasquirt kit and built it myself for around $400, and the options are almost limitless.
i already did the port match. where did u get ur megasquirt. we have done a megasquirt project in college.
Old 12-05-11, 03:58 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by SpikeDerailed
Like karack said, that turbo is WAY overkill for 300-320whp. A BNR stage 3 or stage 4 with a full 3" turbo would spool decent and allow you to retain the stock turbo manifold, which mean nice easy bolt on parts.

The injector combo you mention is a good bit more than you need, but will give you breathing room in the future.

Instead of a walboro I would get a nicer unit with similar flow, think bosch or aeromotive. You're talking about doing a high c/r turbo setup and an engine that already picky, dont risk it on a cheaper pump in your fuel system.

An atkins rebuild kit will be just fine, you could get the rotary aviation kit, which has very durable apex seals. It is however, at the expensive of your rotor housings.

On the flywheel side of things thats your pick, the mazda unit works but kills engine response. Lightweight flywheels will require the use of an ATX rear counterweight. Throw away your non turbo drivetrain and put the Tii stuff in there, its much more durable and its worth it.
thanks for the info, i will lokk into the fuel system. i though the walbro was more than enough.

i also see in the atkin rebuild kit some options with additional charge . anything worth getting?
Old 12-05-11, 04:00 PM
  #13  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
only the n/a lower intake. most people port the TII LIM to work.
because when i looked at aaron cakes project, he had to cut the frame so the wastegate wont interfere. thats y i asked.
Old 12-05-11, 05:02 PM
  #14  
Trunk Ornament

iTrader: (11)
 
AGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I got the MS from diyautotune. There's an install article there and everything that tells you exactly what you'll need.

http://www.diyautotune.com/tech_arti...zda_fc_rx7.htm

Since Aaron kept his NA intake, it required him to extend the exhaust manifold a couple inches. That's why he had to notch his frame. The NA and TII blocks are the exact same size, and the NA and TII cars have the same framework as well, so one fits in the other just the same. So the TII exhaust manifold and turbo will fit without modification, so long as you use the TII intake manifold.
Old 12-06-11, 11:40 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
my first intention was MS after reading some articles, but since this will be my first project, i want to stick with plug and play [for the small part].

the clearance issue with the frame make a lot of sense with the n/a UIM/LIM. i cant belive i didnt catch that.

is there a specific bosh/aerotmotive pump u guys suggest?

injectors? high/low impedence?
Old 12-06-11, 12:20 PM
  #16  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by R-X-R
because when i looked at aaron cakes project, he had to cut the frame so the wastegate wont interfere. thats y i asked.
i've honestly not read alot of the turbo swap DIY threads and pages. but the intake manifold will sit in the stock location and the turbo will sit in the stock location, if he was running a spacer and the n/a lower intake then yes, you will have clearance issues which is why most people slap everything from a turbo setup onto a 6 port block where all you have to do is modify the TII lower intake to bolt to the engine and port match as best possible(which = 0 clearance issues). i know Aaron tried to retain as much as possible from the n/a engine, which well, is obviously more work than it's worth by a longshot.
Old 12-06-11, 12:31 PM
  #17  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
http://www.himni-racing.com/index.ph...g3m5943km1tv90

Like that?
Old 12-06-11, 12:32 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes sir.
Old 12-06-11, 01:10 PM
  #19  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
With the NA lower intake manifold, and a stock turbo on the stock manifold with the 2.5" spacer needed to clear the NA lower, the wastegate actuator intrudes upon the frame. Hence the notch. A better alternative would have been for me to just relocate the wastegate actuator, but hindsight is 20-20.

Question...If you are building the engine, why are you going with a 6 port block yet eliminating the advantage of the 6 port block (the aux ports)? Why not get a TII engine, build that, put high compression rotors into it if you want to, then bolt it in? Same amount of work, much better low end torque.
Old 12-06-11, 03:19 PM
  #20  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i have no other choise other than eleminating the auz port, i am assuiming?

oh, by the way nice watch )
Old 12-06-11, 04:01 PM
  #21  
Slung all my rods
iTrader: (2)
 
Rotank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arab, AL
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd stay away from anything ACT with a sprung disc. They have retupable flywheels, pressure plates, and puck/unsprung discs. But their sprung street discs are great at popping springs and destroying themselves.
Old 12-06-11, 04:16 PM
  #22  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
thats good to know ^ . thank u
Old 12-06-11, 06:32 PM
  #23  
Trunk Ornament

iTrader: (11)
 
AGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No, it's not eliminating it. If you remove the sleeves and port the TII LIM, then you'll still utilize the aux ports on the 6 port engine. All Aaron's saying is that if you're going to build a high compression turbo, then build a TII keg with NA rotors. The thing is, if you've ever driven an NA engine with the 5/6th ports wired open, you'd know it's a dog in the lower rpms. Then drive it with them shut (inoperable) and it's got good low end torque, but poor high rpm power. The same thought goes for the TII engine. It's 4 port for better low end torque, turbocharged for high rpm power. If it were 6 port, it'd be a screamer in the high rpms, but once again, due to turbo lag and the fact that the 5/6 ports are "stuck open" in low rpms it'd be a dog until 3K when the turbo spools. It's all about finding a happy medium.
Old 12-06-11, 07:23 PM
  #24  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
you also don't need the 5/6th ports with a high compression turbo engine, trust me. full spool under 3k.
Old 12-06-11, 07:36 PM
  #25  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
R-X-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Syracuse,NY
Posts: 805
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
my main goal is high end power . kind of opposite what everyone like.,., me weired


Quick Reply: 6 Port Turbo Build and Help Ticket



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.